Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Room temperature superconductors at atmospheric pressure

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-19 10:49

I have cracked the code and hacked the Universe. I have developed my own RTSC. Merely put pieces of the puzzle together with a little reverse engineering to discover the missing details. This is not a joke. Total cost to develop my samples was around $9500, but most of that went into buying a used desktop vacuum sputtering machine for PVD. I'm almost shaking in excitement. I'm not the first to achieve this, but perhaps the first private individual to do so. I'm probably going to destroy my samples and keep quiet about this beyond this thread. Why cast pearls before swine, etc.

Now, superconducting substrates belong to the class of materials known as quantum liquids, and sit in between insulators and regular conductors in terms of their electron gap distance within the atomic lattice of the substrate. Lowering them to their critical temperature induces superconductivity, which occurs when Cooper pairs of electrons form (a macroscopic quantum state) and then flow through the lattice like a liquid, without bumping into each other which would cause decoherence, and thus have zero resistance. Interestingly, black holes are quantum spin liquids (as follows from N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory and the AdS/CFT correspondence) and so provide an interesting model with which to reason about superconductors. Turns out that black holes become superconductive when you place them inside of a box that is in thermal equilibrium with the rate at which the black hole emits Hawking radiation and then increase the angular momentum or spin, which will lower the black hole's temperature or entropy to near zero. Then there's research in the last two years that has discovered that bilayer graphene sheets rotated approximately 1.1 degrees stacked on top of one another become superconducting at higher temperatures (although still only at around 150 degrees kelvin). In a recent paper, it was demonstrated that rotating the graphenes sheets into the Moire pattern actually lowers the entropy of the atomic lattice. Then there's this year's discovery of lanthunum hydride becoming a room temperature superconductor at high pressures (like 2 to 3 million atmospheres). Guess what? Increasing the pressure in a system while maintaining the same temperature lowers its entropy proportionally.

It would seem lowering the entropy is what's key to inducing superconductivity and temperature is merely one axis along which to achieve this. Maximum entropy is the same thing as exact equilibrium, and this would intuit that what we're after is something that places our quantum liquid substrate into a state of high disequilibrium in one or more degrees of freedom.

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-19 11:47

>>1
So basically, a metamaterial(lots of thin sheets in one specific configuration) can be superconductive?
Why this is not explored by anyone else? Looks like its just some lego puzzle with graphene sheets?

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-19 12:01

superconduct my anus

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-20 4:12

>>2
Perhaps that is one avenue to achieving it, but I went a different route with PZT and reverse engineered a recent US Navy patent.

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-20 4:38

Sounds like some sort of "skin effect" between two surfaces and polarisation combine to reduce resistance.

https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-20 4:47

What programming language? Go back to /soldering/ please!

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-20 4:56

>>6
There isn't a /tech/ board so these topics remain here.

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-20 5:45

yawn
anyone else feeling sleepy?

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-20 5:46

Are you going to build a flying object?

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-20 6:20

Would love if OP cited sources than their imagination.

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-20 6:20

conduct my dubs

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-20 11:37

I have cracked the code and hacked the Universe. I have developed my own metacircular evaluator. Merely put pieces of the puzzle together with a little reverse engineering to discover the missing details. This is not a joke. Total cost to develop my samples was around $50, but most of that went into buying a used hardcover copy of SICP. I'm almost shaking in excitement. I'm not the first to achieve this, but perhaps the first private individual to do so. I'm probably going to destroy my samples and keep quiet about this beyond this thread. Why cast pearls before swine, etc.

Name: sage 2019-08-21 8:13

>>12
PRUMBLENUTS

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-21 10:28

dicks out for Harambe

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-21 10:51

Ughhhhhhh
Use curl to poast at 4chan help
Need email2field or instantly b&
Do not auto popular
Robot hunter

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-21 11:49

OP has room temperature IQ

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-21 13:00

>>16
Clever. Log off.

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-21 13:12

>>17
log my anus

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-21 18:00

>>18
Log off, lout.

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-21 20:25

>>16
In Kelvin, right?

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-22 4:45

How's it go
t1p1 and t2p2

p1v1/t1 = p2v2/t2

The general gas equation, temperature (T) is expressed in degrees absolute.

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-22 5:38

>>12
In fact, 99% of so called(sic) LISP can be recreated with variadic macros and _Generic, thanks to recent C11 standard.
https://www.pixelstech.net/article/1326986551-C-Preprocessor-Hell

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-22 6:39

>>21
It's a model, not suitable for real-life gases.

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-22 6:43

Seems like OP might be on to something, been trying to find citations, noticed this.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.01561

The discovery of superconductivity at 203 K in H3S brought attention back to conventional superconductors whose properties can be described by the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) and the Migdal-Eliashberg theories. These theories predict that high, and even room temperature superconductivity (RTSC) is possible in metals possessing certain favorable parameters such as lattice vibrations at high frequencies. However, these general theories do not suffice to predict real superconductors. New superconducting materials can be predicted now with the aid of first principles calculations based on Density Functional Theory (DFT). In particular, the calculations suggested a new family of hydrides possessing a clathrate structure, where the host atom (Ca, Y, La) is at the center of the cage formed by hydrogen atoms. For LaH10 and YH10 superconductivity, with critical temperatures Tc ranging between 240 and 320 K is predicted at megabar pressures. Here, we report superconductivity with a record Tc ~ 250 K within the Fm-3m structure of LaH10 at a pressure P ~ 170 GPa. We proved the existence of superconductivity at 250 K through the observation of zero-resistance, isotope effect, and the decrease of Tc under an external magnetic field, which suggests an upper critical magnetic field of 120 T at zero-temperature. The pressure dependence of the transition temperatures Tc (P) has a maximum of 250-252 K at the pressure of about 170 GPa. This leap, by ~ 50 K, from the previous Tc record of 203 K indicates the real possibility of achieving RTSC (that is at 273 K) in the near future at high pressures and the perspective of conventional superconductivity at ambient pressure.

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-22 7:04

>>22
is your're are anus frozen? even with _Generic, C macros aren't Turing complete unlike Lisp macros. and even if they were, it would still be missing the point - Lisp macros are about using Lisp to write Lisp. C macros allow you to write C but with a weird, clunky language (C preprocessor) that isn't really similar to C. for the same reason, C++ metaprogramming (despite being Turing complete) is not equivalent to Lisp macros because it relies on a pile of hacks (e.g. SFINAE). Lisp macros are a consequence of its basic design (homoiconicity) - comparable metaprogramming systems would be REBOL, MetaLua and GHC extensions that add more type-level programming to Haskell (as opposed to Template Haskell which sucks)

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-22 10:21

Scheduled reminder that LISP sucks

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-22 11:09

>>26
scheduled reminder that your're are an anus

Name: Anonymous 2019-08-22 12:11

>>23
It's a physical equation, it just doesn't like zero terms without some small constants
probably shouldn't be applicable to real-life solids
273K @ 1 million atmos. is apparently similar to 0.000273K @ 1 atmos?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List