>>31No, that's also not right. For the sake of everyone, let me quote RMS's email, as quoted in what started this business,
https://medium.com/@selamie/remove-richard-stallman-fec6ec210794 . If this is a misquote, please let me know, I haven't verified it with anything.
The announcement of the Friday event does an injustice to Marvin Minsky:
“deceased AI ‘pioneer’ Marvin Minsky (who is accused of assaulting one of Epstein’s victims [2])”
The injustice is in the word “assaulting”. The term “sexual assault” is so vague and slippery that it facilitates accusation inflation: taking claims that someone did X and leading people to think of it as Y, which is much worse than X.
The accusation quoted is a clear example of inflation. The reference reports the claim that Minsky had sex with one of Epstein’s harem. (See https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/9/20798900/marvin-minsky-jeffrey-epstein-sex-trafficking-island-court-records-unsealed.)
Let’s presume that was true (I see no reason to disbelieve it).
The word “assaulting” presumes that he applied force or violence, in some unspecified way, but the article itself says no such thing. Only that they had sex.
We can imagine many scenarios, but the most plausible scenario is that she presented herself to him as entirely willing. Assuming she was being coerced by Epstein, he would have had every reason to tell her to conceal that from most of his associates.
I’ve concluded from various examples of accusation inflation that it is absolutely wrong to use the term “sexual assault” in an accusation.
Whatever conduct you want to criticize, you should describe it with a specific term that avoids moral vagueness about the nature of the criticism.
Well, he says a few things, of varying levels of controversiality. However, with regards to your point 1: he does not indicate that he believes the girl was willing, only that she
presented herself to Minsky as willing. In fact, he appears to suggest the very opposite of her being willing: namely, that she was forced (``coerced'') into having sex, only not by Minsky, but by Epstein. It's important to observe here that his email was not centered on the girl or on Epstein, but was sent only in a possible defense of Minsky, who is barely mentioned in any of these posts about him. Well, I'm sure I or anyone else could go on, but all I'm trying to say is that RMS said what he said, but this isn't the same as what some people appear to be saying he said.