Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Stallman Loves Microsoft Money

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-06 10:21

Another sign of the End Times: Free software guru Richard Stallman speaks at Microsoft HQ
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/05/richard_stallman_microsoft/


Remember folks: it is _GNU_ Linux.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 8:05

>>80
Sadly, this

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 8:16

Latest: GNOME severs ties with FSF
https://boards.4channel.org/g/thread/72771929

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 8:18

is there anywhere that's free of all this bullshit? I thought security is but not really given all that illmob drama

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 9:22

Good riddance!
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/mbm74x/computer-scientist-richard-stallman-resigns-from-mit-over-epstein-comments
Computer Scientist Richard Stallman Resigns From MIT Over Epstein Comments

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 9:27

>>84
+1 bum

RMS is a lucky bastard, because America has warm winter.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 9:50

The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits (freedom 3). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 10:35

>>72
Is that why http://sicpvn.sdf.org/ never came about?
>>80
BELIEVE IT!
>>82
Gnome, ever done anything right?
>>86
The freedom to shit on your own post.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 10:39

check my dubs

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 11:42

Time for Mr Stallman to discover the free housing.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 13:26

I'm still trying to discover the free beer.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 13:35

Looks like there was some campaign against RMS #cancelstallman
The tweets aren't erased yet..
https://twitter.com/hashtag/cancelstallman?vertical=default&src=hash

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 15:04

Stallman created Emacs?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gosling_Emacs
In 1983 UniPress began selling Gosling Emacs on Unix for $395 and on VMS for $2,500,[6] after renaming it Unipress Emacs.[2] Controversially, it asked Stallman to stop distributing Gosling Emacs source code. UniPress never took legal action against Stallman or his nascent Free Software Foundation

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 15:11

Stallman also hates open source in general (i.e. software licensed under MIT, BSD or public domain)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZuDhgQmN7U

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 19:44

>>93
He doesn't.

You fags keep being tooled into misquoting and bullshitting RMS.

The American government is using stupid feminazis as tools. Stupid feminazis are using you as tools. Imagine how stupid to the power of stupid you are. Go back to Twitter.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 20:52

>>94
American government is evil! EVIL! t. Ivan Vodkin from Pskov

ok.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-17 21:11

>>92
RMS Emacs predates Gosling by 7 years:
https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsHistory
https://www.jwz.org/doc/emacs-timeline.html
>>94
Let them have their fun. Just misquote Bill Gates and Eric Schmidt instead. Edited on 17/09/2019 21:17.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 3:28

The canary-in-the-coalmine has died, if you noticed, take out any "and later/future/subsequent GPL version" wording from your software(even if its crap, you'll never know how future corporation might re-use it).
https://www.fsf.org/about/staff-and-board

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 7:57

>>97
All joined a few years ago.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 8:27

"Stallman loved lolis as much as he loved free software."

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 16:28

>>98
I don't imagine any of them putting up a fight to preserve FSF from rabid SJWs, if Stallman couldn't handle it.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 16:34

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 16:38

Full thread(before the call for fsf staff twitter accounts) so you can see how its progressed
https://twitter.com/sarahmei/status/1172283772428906496

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 16:44

Finally Stallman has some free time to finish his Hurd. Can we also help Eric S. Raymond to get back making Wesnoth maps, instead of spilling bigoted misogynistic crap? Edited on 18/09/2019 16:45.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 16:52

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 16:59

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 17:31

>>105
"She teaches object-oriented design, is an expert pair programmer,"
BBEEEUUUUUUAAAAAHHHHH...

%%%%%%
%%%% = =
%%C >
_)' _( .' ,
__/ |_/\ " *. o
/` \_\ \/ %`= '_ .
/ ) \/| .^',*. ,
/' /- o/ - " % '_
/\_/ < = , ^ ~ .
)_o|----'| .` '
___// (_ - (\
///-( \' \

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 18:22

>>106
pawn piece gets mad at queen.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 19:05

She is indeed an expert pair-programmer. She finds some whitey soyboy and make him do all the work while she sits next to him drinking the latte.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 20:38

>>106
Hahaha, she's the typical worthless idiot, who obviously fucks her way through life like a cheap whore, just like Zoe Quinn. No wonder this cock sheath dislikes meritocracies.

I wonder why she likes OOP, though; it objectifies.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-18 21:58

Seriously this is almost making me want to an hero.

Words cannot describe how angry I am about this. Stallman is just an autist speaking his autist mind. Everyone knew this and understood it. Say what you want about his statements 10 years ago about CP, rms was discussing the topic in the cold rational style the Roman forum. Sex or prostitution doesn't become rape simply because of +/- 1 year of age or the location and jurisdiction in which it took place. There was no evidence that Marvin Minsky knew the 17 year old was coereced by Epstein or that it was indeed anything more than simple prostitution in the first place. Somehow this obvious statement would be acceptable to say in an American courtroom (where, for now, due process is held in high regard) yet worthy of ruining someone's legacy in the soyverse.

They took Stallman the noble aspie who just wants us to be free from J*wish and nation-state control, and humiliated him. It's not enough that he's an old friendless sperg who failed at his life's mission. He was too not normal. He had to be stripped of his titles and removed from the organization he founded. They kicked him out of the office he probably sleeps in. All because he was not in-group enough for some trannies and women whose first introduction to tech was being admitted to MIT on affirmative action.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-19 3:56

>>110
Its not surprising the SJWs turn on anything, even other SJWs and their own allies. RMS is out-of-touch hippie boomer that doesn't understand current PC culture rules: he doesn't self-censor or think about it, he seems very "free speech is a right" person.
He is very convinient target, because of autistical pedantry and lack of social tact, so it was bound to happen sooner or later. Consider it a early warning: no hobby/niche/community is somehow immune to SJWs, they eventually invade and subvert it. The "freedom of speech" is no longer a given, you have to choose your words very carefully to avoid a pack of rabid SJWs misinterpreting them in worst possible way to conduct a smear campaign.
Cancel culture is merely the outward apperance of SJW infiltration, ask yourself "Would this happen 20-30 years ago?" - what enabled SJWs to ruin people?
They exploit social hivemind and common sense morality as potent psychological tools to shape society and legal frameworks, they're winning because they shifted the "discourse landscape" beneath our feet, to create a speedy process of making a pariah out of their target and make "thought-crime" a real thing.
1984's Big Brother is manifested idea of self-censorship in "freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences" - some thoughts can't be said or discussed because they're "ungood"/"non-PC" regardless of their value or truth.
This climate of "emotional landmines" invented by SJWs and their cultural marxist ideas of "creeping reform through infiltration" makes any, however slight, controversial speech a potential "problematic" issue that has to be addressed/apologized/removed(which by itself will be seen as admittance of wrongness and giving SJWs more ammo against their victim).

Every step of the modern discourse is either agreeing with SJWs and conceding minor freedoms in favor of being left alone or fighting against manufactured scandals,rumors and libel that SJWs engineer out of thin air. No celebrity status will save you from becoming a social pariah:
SJWs weaponized social media and their psychological terrorism methods don't leave much room to resisting, in effect they turn entire community/society against the victim - manipulated crowds/lynchmobs duped into following SJWs agenda due shallow and distorted propoganda that paints their targets as emanations of evil - propped up by SJW-controlled press and blogosphere.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-19 4:26

Basically treating your words as if you're an aspiring politician in a country where all press is eager to make you a monster given any opportunity - is the correct choice. Trump is not an exception, he already apologized and been coerced to change his views.
There is no more "free speech" as a freedom to speak your mind: only limited discourse inside the Overton window where boundaries are shifting day-by-day. Ad hominem is no longer accepted as logical fallacy, but an emotional truth. SJWs have weaponized the entire spectrum of moral dilemma to use as wedge issues. Logical fallacies become emotional tools to use for crowd agitation.
Rationality is taking second place to raw emotional appeal and shallow, fast judgements made on basis of black-and-white morality with no room for subtlety of discourse.
The Current-Year-Morality is creeping towards the future where society invents crimes(in SJWs speech micro-aggressions) out of minor, unimportant events which help SJWs paint the person(ad hominem) as exhibiting evil/ungood tendencies and therefore ripe to be canceled/unpersoned.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-19 6:03

>>110
RMS gave a keynote at the Gran Canaria Desktop Summit in which he described "EMACS virgins" as "women who have never used EMACS" and said that it was a sacred duty to "relieve them of their virginity".

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-19 6:38

>>113
In the context of joke, RMS is emacs evangelist and sees promoting Emacs as very important(after all he invested in it) - he views women as potential Emacs users, he wants to "convert" them and uses humor of virginity as metaphor for Emacs being "hard to use"(requiring effort to break through initial "technical virginity" of non-proficiency), especially for women who likely don't appreacite all the elitist culture of unix.
Women aren't likely to use text-only editors as opposed to commited unix hackers. The entire psychological background is "breaking the virginity/fear" of command-line/text-editor use that allows one to become professional in it, that would be crude approximation to people enjoying sex after virginity loss(but not while not being proficient in sex).
RMS of course doesn't understand sex/virginity being a controversial subject in current-year-culture and the abudance of feminist harpies eager to see rape in everything humorous start screeching that RMS is "raping women into using Emacs" on social media - despite it having non-sense, they equate this poor joke into literal rape propoganda and muse on the patriarchy enabling it(aka "free speech").

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-19 8:02

>>110
Why an hero when you can become Stallman 2.0? Leeches are going to leech, don't let them. Make yourself immune to outlash. Become Bill Gates.
https://archive.vn/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7350469/Bill-Gates-flew-Jeffrey-Epstein-Loliota-Express-2013-years-pedophile-prison-stay.html

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2019-09-19 11:52

The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

O RLY?

RMS got that part very very wrong. If the GPL was not about access to source but freedom to reverse-engineer, it could've become the ultimate viral license. Instead his harping on source code distracted the free software community from better RE tools and gave lawyers more to argue over. Access to a general-purpose computer is the true precondition for this. He even wrote a story about this later (https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html ) but far too late. All the "walled garden" dystopian ecosystems are based on OSS, and sometimes the fat pigs in power even release pieces of it; but having access to the source does nothing. On the other hand, having access to the binary and a means to edit it is all you need.

Also, fuck those SJWs and their bullshite. They have a desire to destroy those in power because their retarded brains can't comprehend the thought of someone being more intelligent than they are. https://dis.tinychan.org/read/prog/1525743384

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-19 11:56

>>116
>If the GPL was not about access to source but freedom to reverse-engineer, it could've become the ultimate viral license
there's no need to reverse engineer GPL software because it gives you source, and there's no way GPL (which is a license) could guarantee the right to reverse engineer non-GPL software (because it has a different license with no such guarantees), so this makes no sense. the only way we could have a universal right to reverse engineer would be if it was codified by law. it should be, but it has nothing to do with licenses
All the "walled garden" dystopian ecosystems are based on OSS
that's technically true - their're are based on OSS, not on what RMS prefers ('free software'). I'd argue that modern (v3) GPL is primarily an anti-walled garden license

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2019-09-19 12:04

there's no need to reverse engineer GPL software because it gives you source

I'm asking "what if GPL was not about mandatory access to source code, but 'freedom to RE, providing source is recommended'?"

and there's no way GPL (which is a license) could guarantee the right to reverse engineer non-GPL software (because it has a different license with no such guarantees),

How do you know whether pieces of some binary came from (or just happened to have the same sequence of bytes!) as in a GPL binary?

That's what I mean by "ultimate viral". It could give plausible deniability to RE everything and basically destroy copyright completely.

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-19 12:27

>>118
that's not how law works

Name: Anonymous 2019-09-19 13:07

>>115
/r/ Virgin Stallman vs Chad Gates memepic.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List