1
Name:
Anonymous
2020-06-28 8:48
Why do we have a shitload of toy elements like <dicksizepicker>
, but not one for a very common requirement of displaying hierarchical elements? And why does every autistic Linuxer write their own, half-functional library for that?
3
Name:
Anonymous
2020-06-28 12:03
>>1 <dicksizepicker>
is a very useful element if you're not a small dick shortcel.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2020-06-29 7:51
>>7 Greenspun's tenth rule in action?
9
Name:
Anonymous
2020-06-29 9:39
I don't know if this is well known, but this is something I figured out a while ago.
<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <body> <details> <summary>The root</summary> <details> <summary>Child 1</summary> <p>Leaf</p> </details> <details> <summary>Child 2</summary> <p>Leaf</p> </details> <details> <summary>Child 3</summary> <details> <summary>Grandchild 1 of 3</summary> <p>Leaf</p> </details> </details> </details> </body> </html>
Info about the details tag:
https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_details.asp
10
Name:
Anonymous
2020-06-29 9:42
>>9 Oh, and add
details {padding-left: 2em;}
as a piece of css to get the shape of the tree structure.
12
Name:
Anonymous
2020-06-29 10:51
>>10,9 that was already presented in
>>2