Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

SICP study thread.

Name: Anonymous 2021-11-30 8:24

ITT we study SICP. All is welcome: reviews, exercise solutions, etc...

Name: Anonymous 2021-11-30 14:54

Read some of it when starting out, enjoyed it but didnt really understand. I'll revisit it when I have time but I'll probably use the js version. S-expression are repulsive.

Name: Anonymous 2021-11-30 17:52

>>2

JS is not repulsive

joke of the day?

Name: Anonymous 2021-11-30 22:40

What if there was a simple compiler that turned expressions such as f(a,b,c) into S-expressions (f a b c)?

Name: Anonymous 2021-12-01 7:58

>>4
Symta?

Name: Anonymous 2021-12-01 8:32

Symta balls lmao

Name: Anonymous 2021-12-01 8:34

>>4
sed?

Name: Anonymous 2021-12-01 14:35

>>3
f=x=>x*x
(define f (lambda (x) (* x x)))
qed + you know js anyhow. ive even gotten to enjoy it. anyways im here for fundamentals not for a bad notation nobody uses

>>4
cpp?

Name: Anonymous 2021-12-02 10:14

it's (define (f x) (* x x))

Name: Anonymous 2021-12-02 20:03

f=x=>x*x
(define (f x) (* x x))
still shit

imagine
f:{[x]x*x}

Name: Anonymous 2021-12-04 4:02

I started reading SICP and watching the Brian Harvey lectures (Berkeley CS 61A). I wouldn't say those are better than the Ultra Super Legendary MIT 6.001 Abelson & Sussman ones, but definitely do the work (specially for n00bs haha)

Name: Anonymous 2021-12-22 2:12

>>4
Common Lisp lets you do that, but why would you?

Newer Posts

SICP study thread.

1 Name: Anonymous 2021-11-30 8:24

2 Name: Anonymous 2021-11-30 14:54

3 Name: Anonymous 2021-11-30 17:52

4 Name: Anonymous 2021-11-30 22:40

5 Name: Anonymous 2021-12-01 7:58

6 Name: Anonymous 2021-12-01 8:32

7 Name: Anonymous 2021-12-01 8:34

8 Name: Anonymous 2021-12-01 14:35

9 Name: Anonymous 2021-12-02 10:14

10 Name: Anonymous 2021-12-02 20:03

11 Name: Anonymous 2021-12-04 4:02

12 Name: Anonymous 2021-12-22 2:12