Name: MikeeUSA 2023-09-08 5:20
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: chaosesqueteam@yahoo.com <chaosesqueteam@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 08:59:56 PM EDT
Subject: Re: Could you please sue GRSecurity.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> RMS: please. You sued Cisco.
> Yet this is allowed? (they violate the copyright on your GCC, in addition to the Linux Kernel)
It is not clear that they are violating the copyright on GCC. It
looks like what they are doing may be lawful.
We have nothing legally to do with Linux, the kernel.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Re: To RMS.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(responded with:)
They are distributing non-separable derivative works to GCC under a no-redistribution agreement.
Which is an additional restriction forbidden by the license you granted to them of your Copyrighted work (infact of your own Authorship aswell).
>may be lawful
See the word you used: may
Anything may be lawful before a case of first impression is brought.
Please bring one.
Those patches and plugins they distribute cannot be used with anything other than GCC
They are infact non-seperable derivative works. You have standing and reason to sue.
Please do so.
PLEASE.
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: chaosesqueteam@yahoo.com <chaosesqueteam@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 08:59:56 PM EDT
Subject: Re: Could you please sue GRSecurity.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> RMS: please. You sued Cisco.
> Yet this is allowed? (they violate the copyright on your GCC, in addition to the Linux Kernel)
It is not clear that they are violating the copyright on GCC. It
looks like what they are doing may be lawful.
We have nothing legally to do with Linux, the kernel.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Re: To RMS.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(responded with:)
They are distributing non-separable derivative works to GCC under a no-redistribution agreement.
Which is an additional restriction forbidden by the license you granted to them of your Copyrighted work (infact of your own Authorship aswell).
>may be lawful
See the word you used: may
Anything may be lawful before a case of first impression is brought.
Please bring one.
Those patches and plugins they distribute cannot be used with anything other than GCC
They are infact non-seperable derivative works. You have standing and reason to sue.
Please do so.
PLEASE.