>>9Homosexual tolerance hurts demographics like we can see in today's West.
Homosexuals aren't enough of a population to make a real difference. Even if we replaced all our homosexuals with straight people, it wouldn't outweigh the fact that technological, industrial societies by their nature don't incentivize large families. Population growth is high in primitive societies because agricultural labor is very heavily dependent on unskilled labor, and without modern healthcare you need to have lots of kids to ensure the family's survival. But now, unskilled labor isn't worth much, so having more kids than you can afford to send to college doesn't make sense. And furthermore, refusing to tolerate homosexuality won't turn them straight. They'll just keep being gay in secret or go celibate. So the effect on birth rates is effectively 0.
>>16A culture and a general spirit of unacceptance of faggotry forces people into healthy gender roles.
As mentioned above, they'll mostly just go celibate rather than pretending to be straight. There's literally no benefit for gays to have straight sex, what's more likely is lesbians and gays marrying each other and pretending to be straight. Really the only benefit to refusing to tolerate homosexuality is that it will reduce the spread of things like AIDS.
>>20,22muh ghey agenduh
nice meme