No better word for this You are too fucking retarded Disgusting Self centered
Ultimately
It was right, it does not know a thing about you. And whatever kept you for so long, and you are "much specially complicated" Clearly that will also, kept me all the same.
And you
On a goddamn parole And sympathies.
Pardon the slowness. You were just lucky to be, Goliath.
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-23 7:06
Walpurgis
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-23 7:07
@goatfarmer7785 3 years ago @fullmetalbg I'm glad you put that question out there it's not underrated that wouldn't be the word I would use to say about this song it's ridiculously undiscovered I would say that but not underrated You Really Got To Be A die-hard Black Sabbath fan to number one come across this song and number to come across this album The peel sessions by the way I've listened to the whole album and there's not really any difference in the version of fairies wear boots except it just sounds more raw and raunchy in the good way you can tell the whole album was cutting a basement so to speak it's dark is raspy it's not just this song listen to the whole album it's amazing @goatfarmer7785 3 years ago @fullmetalbg and this may throw you for a loop but I've been a Christian and I'm not talkin about the type that talks about it every time you see me and everybody I mean I'm very conserved and I keep it close to my chest I don't talk about it but I'm 41 years old and I've been a Christian since I was 13 but I absolutely on the contrary love this album that's when you know you've mastered your craft when you can draw anybody in because there's something for everybody in your music and now when it's like that more people need to hear it and more people need to open their mind and open it wider
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-23 7:07
@ProSkateNate90 3 years ago @GoodHunter9 Walpurgis" was originally intended as a joke by Butler, but Ozzy was the only one who took it seriously, and even after the "Paranoid" album was recorded, Ozzy sang the "Walpurgis" version in concerts, which pissed off the other three. 2 @williamdevlin5439 3 years ago always been my favorite version 1 @njs300800 2 years ago Should have been released as the OG on Paranoid. @HumanoidCableDreads 2 years ago Yeah I like the occult stuff more than the political lyrics it turned into.
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-23 7:16
@ganondorfkingofthegerudo5214 5 years ago (edited) It's amazing how just a shift in theme in lyrics and tempo can change the tone of the song entirely.
War Pigs sounds gung ho, ironically as if the listener is a soldier going to war. The solos at the end sound as if you're there, fighting for your life.
In this version, you feel helpless. It feels even more anguishing, as if you're watching your town burn down and get destroyed by demons and there is absolutely NOTHING you can do but look on in horror. You want to run, but you're paralyzed both by shock and devastation. 310 @rafaelsoto1099 4 years ago nice analysis 7 @Sthephyr12 4 years ago I'm not sure cathartic is the word I'd use for that scenario. 1 @patrickmohan2220 4 years ago Captain Bruh This is heavy blues rock, NOTHING to do with doom metal. 2 @patrickmohan2220 4 years ago Captain Bruh Nope, it isn't. "Metal" wasn't even a genre back then. It's lazy knuckleheads who later put them in the same club as Priest or Maiden. 1 @thememester9147 3 years ago Captain Bruh yeah without Sabbath theres no Priest, no Maiden, nothing metal. Truly groundbreaking 12 @elaztecca 2 years ago You’re an excellent writer that just took me I was with you there haha ! Thanks! 1 @josiahp.6960 2 years ago @patrickmohan2220 ... Heavy blues rock? How heavy does it have to get before it's metal? Nothing heavier existed in 1968. Listen to the other tracks on Paranoid. Hand of Doom? Electric Funeral? Those are the Johnny B. Goode's of Doom metal. 8 @patrickmohan2220 2 years ago @josiahp.6960 I've been listening to Sabbath since I was seven years old. I'm now 44. Those tracks you listed didn't exist in 1968, and yes the first album is heavy blues rock. "Metal" didn't exist until some idiotic journalist coined the term, and Sabbath were one of several bands disgusted with that label. Do your homework kiddo. 1 @josiahp.6960 2 years ago @patrickmohan2220 Walpurgis, the song in the video above, is what I was referring to. I know nobody liked the term metal, I'm not talking about what they called metal. I'm talking about what we are calling metal. If I label an album jazz (which is what Bill Ward and Tony Iommi played), but it's full of distortion and power chords, folks are gonna give it a different label. 1 @patrickmohan2220 2 years ago @josiahp.6960 War Pigs. Y'see man, what you're doing is a "duck and cover". Desperately trying to seem hip, when you've been caught posing out in the open. Keep going, I'm enjoying this.
Anonymous Sat 03 May 2025 23:38:46 No.105160836 Report Quoted By: >>105170796 >>105160614 >No idea if any brand of BD-R as as good. 100GB BDXL M-DISCs if you're not a poorfag.
If you're a poorfag and can only afford dye-based BD-Rs, at least make sure their data layers are based on MABL (non-organic metal ablative) compounds. Verbatim makes 25GB MABL BD-Rs, and Sony 128GB BDXL discs are MABL-based but supply is dwindling since their factory (the only one in that world that produced 128GB BDXL discs) got shut down due for ESG purposes a year or two ago.
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-23 8:08
Anonymous Sat 03 May 2025 22:30:56 No.105160415 Report Quoted By: >>105167188 >>105159839 HDD any nas will do if you want a GOOD ssd make sure you pick a tlc or mlc one (these are rare now). a good Samsung EVO will do.
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-23 8:10
Anonymous Sun 04 May 2025 00:13:32 No.105160990 Report >>105159839 Optane, not flash, not mechanical, phase change memory, most durable thing humans made so far. It's either that or LTO tapes, they rate at 25 years.
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-24 6:24
i..pw wocvxb.txt tnidjx.pdf ompldr
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-24 11:41
@ChaosEsqueTeam 0 seconds ago Angry mishling attacks actual Jew (Richard Matthew Stallman) in 2012. Demands white bois follow the law of Jesus Christ (the cstrtr: matthew 19, greek), and reject the laws of YHWH. YHWH explicitly allows child brides (Devarim 22 vrse 28, archaic ancient hebrew, greek, latin). xxc @ChaosEsqueTeam 0 seconds ago Angry mishling attacks actual Jew (Richard Matthew Stallman) in 2012. Demands white bois follow the law of Jesus Christ (the cstrtr: matthew 19, greek), and reject the laws of YHWH. YHWH explicitly allows child brides (Devarim 22 vrse 28, archaic ancient hebrew, greek, latin). @ChaosEsqueTeam 0 seconds ago YHWH explicitly allows child brides (Devarim 22 vrse 28, archaic ancient hebrew, greek, latin). @ChaosEsqueTeam 0 seconds ago Lunduke: I pray to YHWH that Jeremy takes revenge against you. @ChaosEsqueTeam 4 minutes ago Why do "pdos" need permission from you christians to code C for free now? Didn't in the 80s, 90s, 2000s, 2010s?
Now you need personal permission from the new Jesus of Christians: Brian Lunduke, to code C for free. Why was a microsoft employee allowed to take over the hacker hobby?
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-24 12:14
Jeremy Bicha, Richard Matthew Stallman, Hans Reiser, Jffry Epstn, and (allegedly) Trmp; are all welcomed in the Chaos Esque Anthology project. Code not Conduct. Non-Free-Software Non-Programmers like Brian Lunduke, Random Christian Feminists, Random women, and Nina Reiser are not welcomed in the Project as they are not programmers and just wish to socially control the "mmaalllesss". Brian: You're no Jesus. YHWH's law explicitly allows chld brides. In ancient archaic hebrew, greek, and latin. You like to whip up the moron white cattle against those who know what is good in life and a gift from YHWH. Rember: nickel chaser: and fake "awww shucks" enemy: Money was invented to buy virgin female chldren for marraige: Sumer Cuneform tablets, and to approportion grain to the army. That is it's first purpouse.
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-24 12:16
ago Richard Matthew Stallman always was pro-PDF file. Idiot. Just the get the fk out if you don't like PDF software. Non-programmer. Go back to windows. Oh wait: Bill Gates was friends with Epstine. HAHAHHAHA MAKE YOUR OWN CHRISTIAN "MILLSTONE" OS. YHWH allows chld brides (Devarim 22 verse 28 in ancient archaic hebrew, greek, latin (not english))
Name:
Anonymous2025-07-24 12:17
"Whte fking rtard wants to look the gift horse in the mouth" Bet you hate RMS too. Use a paid OS made by pjts instead. Freeloading POS.
30 October 2024, 11:52 AM On the one hand, having more users use MPROTECT out of the box for most programs isn't a bad thing for security... even though some of the most exposed programs with the largest attack surfaces, primarily all of the main Web browser engines, can't work without RWX memory at the moment.
On the other hand, PaX does so much more than this - as can be seen in the 4 years of grsecurity patches from 2017-2021 which can be publicly downloaded under the GPLv2, most of the 10+ MB these patches have reached come from the PaX side - that this isn't funny... Technically, Protection against eXploitation provides, well, efficient defenses against exploitation, multiple of which tended to foil published Linux kernel exploits (I used to play that game back in the day with spender in the LWN comments), missing from both mainline and this OpenPaX thing. The main ones are: * KERNEXEC: x86 SMEP / ARM PXN / etc. also for processors which don't have these features; * MEMORY_UDEREF: x86 SMAP / ARM PAN / etc. for processors which don't have these features, and more; * much more widespread CONSTIFY, part of which is performed partially through a GCC plugin; * opt-out REFCOUNT protecting all atomics but the ones explicitly unprotected, instead of slowly protecting some refcounts; * RAP: efficient three-way CFI with both forward edge and backward edge, and more GCC plugins; * RESPECTRE: GCC plugin for automated Spectre defenses, instead of manual annotations; * AUTOSLAB (again, GCC plugins, because that is a very good thing) for separated slab caches => reduced reliability of some memory spreading attacks; * back in the day, safer eBPF JIT code generation, I don't know whether mainline did all about that. The commercial versions have more than that, e.g. whatever their "KERNSEAL" does, or maybe an improved RANDSTRUCT (GCC plugin, again). While mainline phases out GCC plugins because they can't maintain them, Open Source Security Inc. doubles down on them, which enables them to support a wide range of GCC versions (instead of crippling kernel builds if the compiler isn't very recent) while improving maintainability and code generation. Years ago, I remember that they tried to work with LLVM plugins, but there were technical limitations. Not that LLVM plugins - even if they made it possible to do the job - would help the vast majority of Linux distro users, since pretty few Linux distros don't use GCC to build their kernels and user-space anyway, so it makes perfect sense to work on GCC plugins.
grsecurity adds to PaX e.g. chroot protections, a RBAC, etc. Oh, and security backports which were missed in mainline.
So let's see how this evolves, whether it fares better than linux-hardened, and whether other distros start providing such kernels as well. However, as it stands, AFAICT, it doesn't raise the bar much for attackers... and it won't without all of KERNEXEC (many people still use Sandy Bridge or older Intel Processors, or AMD Zen processors without SMEP - IIRC, pre-Zen), MEMORY_UDEREF (even more people still don't use Broadwell/Skylake/Zen processors), wide CONSTIFY, proper REFCOUNT, RAP and possibly AUTOSLAB. Last edited by debrouxl; 30 October 2024, 12:34 PM.
Yes I understand this but again the situation with GRSecurity is different. One, it's a derivative work. GRSecurity isn't the creator or license issuer. Two, they charge for access and will threaten and revoke access to 'customers' if someone redistributes the patches. Again if they place restrictions on who can access the patches and it's a derivative work under the GPL is GRSecurity's source freely available? Now can they charge a distribution fee to download the patches? Sure. But under the GPL they can't place stipulations on who can access it. If anyone could just go pay the download fee and then redistribute the patches this wouldn't be an issue. GRSecurity is dictating terms and choosing who has access to the patches.
Seriously you just research this. This has been an ongoing issue for years. Here's Bruce Perens co-founder the Open Source Initiative explaining the issue:
It would fail a fair-use test... Because of its strongly derivative nature of the kernel, it must be under the GPL version 2 license, or a license compatible with the GPL and with terms no more restrictive than the GPL. Earlier versions were distributed under GPL version 2... My understanding from several reliable sources is that customers are verbally or otherwise warned that if they redistribute the Grsecurity patch, as would be their right under the GPL, that they will be assessed a penalty: they will no longer be allowed to be customers, and will not be granted access to any further versions of Grsecurity. GPL version 2 section 6 explicitly prohibits the addition of terms such as this redistribution prohibition...
This is tantamount to the addition of a term to the GPL prohibiting distribution or creating a penalty for distribution. GPL section 6 specifically prohibits any addition of terms. Thus, the GPL license, which allows Grsecurity to create its derivative work of the Linux kernel, terminates, and the copyright of the Linux Kernel is infringed. The contract from the Linux kernel developers to both Grsecurity and the customer which is inherent in the GPL is breached.
########################################################## LINK=$(CC) # Only needed for GLIBC stack trace: LFLAGS=-rdynamic LFLAGS+=-fno-pie -no-pie ##########################################################
Secondly add the no-pie options to the C++ makefile: ( -fno-pie -no-pie ) Then go to /win/vulture/GNUmakefile, find the section: $(OUTPUT_OBJ): $(VOBJ) @echo combining objects to $@ @$(CXX) -nostdlib -Xlinker -r $(VOBJ) -L /tmp/libstdcxx/lib64 -lstdc++ -o $(OUTPUT_OBJ)
Change it to: $(OUTPUT_OBJ): $(VOBJ) @echo combining objects to $@ @$(CXX) -nostdlib -Xlinker -r $(VOBJ) -L /tmp/libstdcxx/lib64 -lstdc++ -o $(OUTPUT_OBJ) -fno-pie -no-pie
Then this should work:
cd sys/unix sh setup.sh hints/linuxnopieattempt cd ../.. make all
Additionally if we want to install as root (change the prefix and some options (ie let it change group, set group as games, etc)): PREFIX=/usr #PREFIX=$(wildcard ~)/nh/install
