We aren't just anything nor atoms. Plus reductionism doesn't even work that way.
>>4Why is the physical world assumed to the be only real world among presumed non-real worlds (pure mathematics, non-material, abstract, spiritual, intellectual, art, etc) when it too is perceived by minds? And these presumed non-real worlds are able to have impact on this presumed only real world. Is this physical world not just the middle road? The tree, of under the earth, of on the earth (physical) and above the earth. And computers don't necessarily ``solve'' and the problems they do are of a computational nature or else they wouldn't be able to do them. It seems humans aren't too good at calculating absurd amounts of numbers within a second (they can do it of course but not within such a short amount of time) which a computer can do and then be used to simulate something from that ability. But humans can do things that only sentient minds can do such as create the computer, discover the concept of numbers, create the concept of calculating, create the concept of simulation, use those to things to solve problems, and also solve non-computational problems which require high intellect such as the problems within pure mathematics.