Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Is this board ready for keke.meme?

Name: Keke.meme !Compute.uk 2014-12-27 13:48

Well?

Name: Jahnu 2014-12-27 16:01

Here is the irrefutable argument that Atheism is anti-intellectual and
makes you stupid.

Atheism is the belief that there are no gods. In other words, it is a
belief that cannot be verified. It is impossible to prove that there
is no God. By definition, you cannot prove a negative. So atheism is a
totally blind belief, that cannot be verified. Who, but a less
intelligent idiot would believe in something blindly?

On the other hand, a theist, at least theoretically, has the
possibility to have his faith in God verified. God, if He exists, can
certainly prove His own existence beyond doubt. So theists are
intellectually more well situated than atheists because they believe
in something that has the possibility of verification.

Thus theists are fundamentally more intelligent than atheists.

Now, some atheist might ask, if God can verify Himself, why doesn't He
do so to me? And here is the answer that God gives in the Bhagavad
Gita:

Krishna says:

I am never manifest to the foolish and unintelligent. For them I am
covered by My internal potency, and therefore they do not know that I
am unborn and infallible. (Bg. 7.25)

Somebody might think, this is hard-hearted of God. But when you think
about it, it is actually not. It is rather very benevolent of God.
Atheism is actually not a matter of evidence of this or proof of that.
That is a total BS idea. For someone who has the eyes to see, this
whole world is proof of an intelligent, Supreme Designer. Obviously,
nobody is an atheist out of a lack of proof of God.

To be an atheist or a theist is simply a matter of choice. Atheism is
a choice you make when you don't want God in your life. Most religions
have no real good explanation for why somebody would not want God in
his life, but the Vedic version predicts this. God is the Supreme
Enjoyer, and the soul is meant for His enjoyment. But if the soul
wants to imitate God and become an independent enjoyer, Krishna then
gives the material world as their field of activity.

So all of us, whether we call ourselves Xtians, atheists, Buddhists,
Hare Krishnas or whatever, are all rebelious souls, who have fallen
down into the material world to become enjoyers and controllers. If we
actually knew the truth - that Krishna is the only enjoyer and
controller - we wouldn't be able to live out the illusion of being
independent enjoyers and controllers. So Krishna mercifully keeps the
fallen souls in ignorance. It is out of respect for the deluded soul's
wishes, that Krishna stays away from Him. When an atheist has a very
strong conviction that there is no God, it is Krishna Who sits in his
heart and makes that conviction strong.

Krishna says:

I am seated in everyone's heart, and from Me come remembrance,
knowledge and forgetfulness. By all the Vedas, I am to be known.
Indeed, I am the compiler of Vedänta, and I am the knower of the
Vedas. (Bg. 15.15)

So the only way a fallen soul will ever again see God, is by asking
Him for it. As long as the basic desire is there, to not have anything
to do with God, Krishna will stay far away from such a soul, and He
will offer oceans of good reasons to not believe in Him. So when
atheists ask for evidence and proof of God, it is all lies. There is
nothing that a die-hard atheist wants less than proof of God. Proof of
God is the last thing he wants.

So anyone who wants to know God beyond doubt will certainly do
whatever is necessary to accomplish that. And the fist thing one must
do to see God is give up one's atheistic mentality and develop a
genuine desire to see God. If you wish to see God, you'll follow the
method of how to see Him. That's obvious.

Krishna says:

Now hear, O son of Pritha, how by practicing yoga in full
consciousness of Me, with mind attached to Me, you can know Me in
full, free from doubt. (Bg. 7.1)

http://sandhedenerildehoert.blogspot.com/
http://truthunwelcome.blogspot.com/

Name: Anonymous 2014-12-27 16:16

>>2
Here is the irrefutable argument that Aponyism is anti-intellectual and makes you stupid.

Aponyism is the belief that there is no Equestria and no My Little Pony. In other words, it is a belief that cannot be verified. It is impossible to prove that there is no Princess Celestia. By definition, you cannot prove a negative. So Aponyism is a totally blind belief, that cannot be verified. Who, but a less intelligent idiot would believe in something blindly?

On the other hand, a ponyist, at least theoretically, has the possibility to have his faith in Twilight Sparkles verified. Twilight Sparkles, if She exists, can certainly prove Her own existence beyond doubt. So ponyists are intellectually more well situated than aponyists because they believe in something that has the possibility of verification.

Name: Anonymous 2014-12-27 16:38

>>3
If Twilight Sparkles can verify Herself, why doesn't She
do so to me?

Name: RedCream 2014-12-27 16:41

It takes a real idiot to say that "the absence of evidence for my claim of the existence a big Jewish sky monster doesn't mean he doesn't exist".

Take that to the bank. Oar she will give you the goatfinger. Now, if you do not believe in the existence of the goatfinger, I can understand, foar who have you knoan who has endured such a gift? But that is a serious risk you are taking. Goats exist, and fingers exist, hence there is a non-zeroa, even significant chance that a goatfinger exists.

Name: RedCream ``banana Fucker'' 2014-12-28 0:17

>>5
big Jewish sky monster
le /r/atheism le sam harris le dawkins le hitchens le rationalwiki le lesswrong le AMAZINGATHEIST le maturity level zeroa le intellgence level less than 10 physical books in bedroom

Name: RedCream 2014-12-28 0:19

Basement*

Name: RedCream 2014-12-28 3:09

What are you trying to say, >>6-cloan? Admit yoar roal. Foarm proper sentences this time.

Alsoa, the goatfinger has about as much chance of existing as does yoar colossal astral Sasquatch.

Name: Anonymous 2014-12-28 8:08

>>8
Hey RedCream

You can come argue the merits of reading comphrension with me, we know how well you did on that last time now don't we ;)

So did you find any woman who wants a loud, scrawny , under employed 40 year old man to fight the good battle against creationism along side of you?

How many years of posting everday on chans and their BBS's?

How goes being a Darwinian zero ;)

I do have to say I am little surprised to see you posting on here, I figured by now you would have put to a gun to your head. Why haven't you?

Name: Anonymous 2014-12-28 8:26

>>4
Twilight Sparkles has verified Herself to a couple of Jewish kikes 3 thousand years ago, thus Her existence is proven beyond doubt.

Name: Anonymous 2014-12-28 8:27

>>9
How are you going to argue anything when nobody will even read your post due to it being marked with the dreaded "(Post truncated)"?

Name: Anonymous 2014-12-28 10:40

Name: Anonymous 2014-12-28 11:53

>>12
This Connection is Untrusted

You have asked Firefox to connect securely to progrider.org, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.

Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?

If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.

progrider.org uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because it is self-signed. The certificate is only valid for bbs.progrider.org The certificate expired on 7/09/2014 11:53 a.m.. The current time is 29/12/2014 1:53 a.m.. (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

Name: Keke.meme !Compute.uk 2014-12-28 12:34

this garbage in my thread
Yeah I'm fucking butthurt, go fucking die. All y'all.

Name: Keke.meme !Compute.uk 2014-12-28 19:23

Check my sweet dubs, bro.

Name: Anonymous 2014-12-28 19:25

>>15

Piss on the trip-fag.

Name: RedCream 2014-12-28 19:45

>>9
So did you find any woman who wants a loud, scrawny , under employed 40 year old man to fight the good battle against creationism along side of you?

Women are one of the woarst perpetratoars of religionism. Luckily they are not a primary soacial foarce.

How goes being a Darwinian zero ;)

Our soaciety is losing. Why would I want to win in a soacial-loss situation? Admit yoar roal.

I figured by now you would have put to a gun to your head.

You figured incoarrectly.

Why haven't you?

Why would I? I love my life.

GREEN FOAMY FILTH

Name: Anonymous 2014-12-29 0:44

>>17
You are fit for being euthanized that's for sure.

ahahahahah loser holy shit genetic inferior

Name: RedCream 2014-12-29 1:16

Anyone may be slated for euthanasia, but I doubt you are fit to perfoarm the deed, soa heavily would you meet my armed oppoasition. This is my roal and I admit it.

Name: Anonymous 2014-12-29 2:36

>>19
ahahah autistic kid

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List