Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Philosophy thread

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 9:02

Anyone can count the seeds in an apple. No one can count the apples in a seed

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 9:08

...Is your name Mike?

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 9:10

>>2
Yes. Mike Kirkbride.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 9:11

>>1 A successful seed results in a tree bearing ~300-400kg of apples per year

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 10:03

>>1
there is zero apple in a seed. think about it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 10:13

>>5 a seed represents less than 1/1000 of apples volume but not 0.
You could say seed has ~0.00003 apple units in it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 10:21

>>6
No because a seed actually has zero apple. Don't you see?!

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 10:25

these days they have what are called 66super apples99 that have no seeds. They come from the branches of a singles mother plant believed to be holy and is kept alive by complex cloning methods. However, no commercially sold banana has seeds, for the same reasons, yet these bananas are not known as super. It's mostly a marketing ploy, methinks.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 12:44

>>1
Are you kidding? What kind of seed can fit an apple, let alone produce one. Retarded.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 13:25

New apple trees are grafted from existing ones, nobody grows them from seed.

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 13:28

>>10
Are you kidding? Then how come apples still contain seeds? How come I threw apples into my backyard as a kid and now I go back and I see a few trees, presumably apple, growing there?

Name: Anonymous 2015-04-06 15:50

>>11
Okay, I revise my previous statement to: only morons grow them from seeds.

Name: RedCream 2015-04-06 16:08

Dubs-kun (>>11 (check them)), you presume thoase trees are of the apple variety, but have you subjected yoar assumption to the rigoars of empirical examination? I think not.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List