African-Americans are inferior to African-Africans

“at least as measured by enrollment in elite universities, black immigrants and their children are succeeding in America far more, on average, than blacks whose families have been in the U.S. for generations--i.e., the descendants of slaves. This is a strong argument against the proposition that black underachievement in America is primarily the result of present-day racism.”

Yay! The slaves were picked among the strongest and dumbest.

How is it "smart" to go to university and work hard like a good goy, taking on debt to make various jews richer? Face it, the average white American is far more comparable to mindless, expendable cattle than the nigs, who at least avoid participating in the parasitic system as much as possible.

cocks

American black underachievement is the result of American blacks being under achievers.

i.e., the descendants of slaves

Are they even a majority?

I've noticed that Africa-born niggers are on average a lot more polite, educated, well-dressed, hard-working and all around more similar to real human beings instead of parasitic beasts like the niggers born here.

Maybe it's selection bias, since most current african immigrants are usually moderately skilled people looking for a future abroad, instead of some tribesmen captured to work on cotton farms or crossing the mediterranean on nigboats.

>>6
Probably selection bias. Otherwise there would be at least a single negro-nation in Africa that had its own civilization as opposed to being civilized by outer influences like Arabs or Europeans.

But no. Meso- and South-Americans had cultures, they built pyramids and developed sciences. South-East Asians, Mesopotamians, Ancient Chinese had cultures, pyramids, sciences. There are ancient cities and pyramids discovered in Siberia. Even the Ancient Egyptians, despite living in Africa, had a sophisticated civilization.

And only negroes spent all those thousands of years eating bananas, drinking cow urine and cannibalizing the adjacent tribes. They would continue doing it too if the Arab men and the White men (you know, back when Whites were men capable of conquests, and not self-hating guilt-ridden pussies) didn't come to their lands and build them mosques and temples.

>>2
Low iq nigger

>>7
What's funny is that even the Polynesians who journeyed to Easter Island and settled there, an island that's probably the most isolated place in the world, being more than 2,500 miles away from anything in every direction, managed to eventually thrive and create large stone monuments, complex agricultural systems, underground irrigation and a language / glyph system advanced enough that it's completely undecipherable since none are left who know how to read it, and is one of the few indepdent inventions of writing in history.

The argument is often put forth that "But it's the environment! That's why they didn't advance! Lack of resources! Lack of the right resources!", but if a civilization can accomplish that much on an isolated island with a very small variety of resources, just palms, root vegetables, fish, and volcanic rock, then there's no excuse.

>>9

Amazonian tribes had agriculture for thousands of years before the peoples at equivalent latitudes and environment in Africa(i.e. Congo)

The only societies that have comparable levels of worthlessness as sub-saharan africans are melanesians such as Papuans and Australian natives, and negritos from Asia such as the Andaman Islanders. Africa is pretty much devoid of society outside of areas of semitic influence on the northern fringes, such as Mali, Ethiopia and Sudan.