Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

they din du nuffin

Name: 420everyday 2015-08-04 20:43

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-04 20:49

officers destroying cameras and DVR
several cameras still working after that

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-04 20:55

This is probably staged specifically to give Police a bad image. I mean, they were supposedly destroying the cameras but the whole thing looks like a movie with all those good, clear shots and theatrics. Too theatrical to be true.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-04 20:56

>>2
They had a secondary hidden CCTV. Pretty clever for a bunch of potheads.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-04 21:05

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-04 22:53

The lawsuit argues that the video doesn’t paint a fair version of events. The suit also claims the video shouldn’t be used as evidence because, among other things, the police didn’t know they were on camera.
“All police personnel present had a reasonable expectation that their conversations were no longer being recorded and the undercover officers, feeling that they were safe to do so, removed their masks,” says the suit.

This is a good thing. It'll set a good precedent for everyone. Tapping phones will be useless now because defendants can have the recording thrown out because they didn't know they were being recorded.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-05 1:10

>>2
Where did you get those quotes from, imageboard-kun?

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-05 1:27

>>7
from your mom, why?

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-05 4:08

>>7
Uh, it's called a meme? Look it up some time...

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-07 17:26

>>6
There's no reasonable expectation of privacy inside of a store that's not owned by you. Further, their expectation of privacy stems from the fact that they set to (probably unlawfully) dismantle the cameras the owners placed for their own protection and failed to do so. The only precedent it will set is that the police will be able to do what they want and dismiss evidence of misbehaviour.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-07 17:29

>>9
Epic meme /b/rah XD

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-07 17:39

eat pot everyday
(>>13 I'm quoting those police officers!)

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-07 19:47

>>10
How is that different from expecting privacy in your own home and phone conversations? For example, if I put a listening device in my own home, then remove it, then I will have as much reason to expect privacy as those cops. Thus, any recordings made in my home after the removal will be illegal for use in court.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List