I'm sure there is such a software, you can just paint your musics in photoshop, and neural nets will convert it to waveform.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-22 11:33
there are various FFT shits but they require bringing up fucking piano keyboard with samples and laying out notes manually and you cant really connect their output to the input.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-22 13:44
I'm sure matlab could do it fairly easily. Paint your spectrogram, slice it up and convert back to time domain signal.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-22 14:10
>>3 Loseless spectrogram includes a lot of noise and tacit parameters, so the result of naively editing it will sound like crap.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-22 14:24
>>4 Where is this loseless shit coming from? I thought the point was to start in freq domain.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-22 16:26
>>5 freq domain is huge, unless you reduce it to a few controllable params, while neural net auto-fills all tacit params.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-22 17:02
>>6 I don't understand. Is the input a bunch of knob twiddling parameters or is it the painting?
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-22 18:32
>>7 paintings vary in detail. One wants to use fat brush and get tiny details.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-23 13:28
I might actually write this IN LISP if it doesn't already exist.
Latest Audacity version includes some hard to use spectral editing, which allows selecting rectangle and cutting it out. but it is far from Sony SpectraLayers Pro, which allows very precise editing, like it is a photoshop image. There are also Photosounder and similar utils, translating arbitrary images into sound. People do use it when they need to design high quality custom sounds, like that THX note.
Name:
Anonymous2016-05-23 0:59
SpectraLayers are really cool, like that sci-fi forensic software. You can pick some barely hearable voice and amplify it understand what the terrorists really say.
Name:
Anonymous2016-05-23 10:22
There was a korg back in the 80s that let you draw waveforms with the onboard sliders. I think it also had analog oscillators and filters too. It was weird
Name:
Anonymous2016-05-23 18:41
>>14 Editing audio waveforms is the stupidity on the level of editing light waves, because human brain works with spectrum, not waveforms. There do exist physically correct image formats, but nobody cares about them, beside scientists.
Name:
Anonymous2016-05-23 22:33
>>15 They're light particles, moron, and I'll edit them without regard for opinion on the subject.
If your post is such an image, how come I'm able to easily highlight it and drag it into the TEXT box like soEverything is an image, even this post; you're just not using a program that handles its encoding.
Name:
Anonymous2016-05-24 14:32
>>21 BrailleNote handles the encoding just fine, still not seeing any image though.
Name:
Anonymous2016-05-25 0:54
>>16 24-bit RGB color space is all the human eye can see. Anything having higher amplitude will be damaging to the eye, while high frequencies can give you AIDS and low freqs cant be seen at all. So is not made out of particles or waves: light consists of RGB triplets. as far as video game and web designers are concerned.
Name:
Anonymous2016-05-25 0:56
>>23 you must be that blind guy, disliking youtube videos.