/lounge/ - Who needs functional programming...

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-26 23:48

...when C has function pointers?

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-27 0:42

c isn't elegant

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-27 1:59

This thread has been closed by order of Chief Rabbinate David Baruch Lau. You cannot reply anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-30 14:45

>>3
O rly?

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-30 16:10

C++ is faster than C and has smaller binary sizes (= cheaper hardware)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDSvjwJ2M80

Name: Anonymous 2016-04-30 17:53

wtf jerk fuck off back to /prog/ with this programming shit, this is /lounge/

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-02 0:24

>>5

smaller binary sizes

I don't think so. At least for Hello World tier programs, the C++ standard libraries are MUCH more bloated than the C versions. Of course, there's no reason why you can't use the C libraries in C++, it's just that in practice people generally don't.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-02 0:44

>>5

smaller binary sizes

First time I hear this bs.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-02 18:43

>>5
Why the fuck would you use C++ in the first place if you're going to imitate C anyways?!?

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-05 2:03

>>9
So I can talk about it on the internet.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-05 2:30

Lisp is dead and buried, write in C.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 2:18

>>9
Because it's faster? Can you read?

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 3:36

>>12

Because it's faster?

I don't know.

Can you read?

Yes.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-14 4:40

>>11 (dubs)
But function pointers don't make C an acceptable Lisp

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-14 4:51

>>13

I don't know.

Don't know what, asshole! That wasn't a question you can answer yes or no to. Wow, am I mad. Don't even try that shit here.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-14 12:51

>>15
I don't know if it's faster. Can you read?

Who needs functional programming...

1 Name: Anonymous 2016-04-26 23:48

2 Name: Anonymous 2016-04-27 0:42

3 Name: Anonymous 2016-04-27 1:59

4 Name: Anonymous 2016-04-30 14:45

5 Name: Anonymous 2016-04-30 16:10

6 Name: Anonymous 2016-04-30 17:53

7 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-02 0:24

8 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-02 0:44

9 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-02 18:43

10 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-05 2:03

11 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-05 2:30

12 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 2:18

13 Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 3:36

14 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-14 4:40

15 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-14 4:51

16 Name: Anonymous 2016-06-14 12:51