Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

[AMA] I'm a high ranking member of the Alt-Right

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 4:38

I see a lot of people are confused about what exactly the Alt Right is and what our plans actually are. Please use this thread to ask any relevant questions, I will do my best to answer them. nb. no questions on the Frog.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 12:00

Why are so many people saying your leader is a gay British Jew?

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 20:56

>>2
Why shouldn't a gay british jew be the leader of the alt-right? That's what makes it "alt".

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 21:29

>>1
Why do you say "ask me anything" but then you won't take questions about the Frog? Isn't that a contradiction?

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 21:46

>>3
Because he's gay, and British, and a Jew. There would have to be an alt-alt-right.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 22:33

>>4
No.
>>5
The 'alt' in alt-right stands for 'alternative lifestyles' - we welcome gay British Jews with open arms.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 2:33

Ctrl-Alt-Right

Name: delete meta 2016-10-01 4:47

Alt rogtht is just conservative views made cool for memeing twitter teenbros.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 10:50

>>4
OH MY FUCKING GOD. No, he NEVER ONCE said "ask me anything" he said "ask me relevant questions". Oh dear god. It literally feels unreal I have to point that out.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 11:03

>>9
[AMA]

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 14:32

Sometimes I open up The Guardian website just to have some good laughs at how stupid and mind-numb leftists are.

"I found utopia – it was in my mind
Ian Jack"
Yeah who would've thought that your leftist bullshit works only in your mind, genius.

"Brad and Angelina proved there's no such thing as the perfect marriage: so why do we pretend?
Hadley Freeman"
They've adopted only like a dozen non-white immigrants instead of having their own children, their marriage was so close to perfect, yeah! Who would've thought they'd break up!

"The Guardian view
Malnutrition is holding millions of children back"
No shit, sherlock, it's kind of hard to achieve much when you're starving. But guess what, most children have malnutrition only because their parents want them to, otherwise they wouldn't spawn so many kids. If the population of poor countries didn't like fucking double since the 1970s, they would all be well-fed today.

"Police brutality
Could a boycott by black Americans end injustice?"
How about you fuck yourself, you racist twat? Police brutality is experienced equally by people of all races, stop pretending your beloved negroes are somehow special and deserve special rights.

"Wonder Woman
Will Wonder Woman be the movies' first major queer superhero?"
Sure, that's like the most important issue in today's media: The Lack of Lesbian Superheroes. Fucking douchebags.

"‘Here I have nobody’: life in a strange country may be worse than Guantánamo"
Why don't you leave that strange country instead of bitching on the internet, peabrain?

"Celebrity consent: stop branding attacks on women as 'pranks'"
Some skinny famous bitch in a crowd got lifted in the air and then put back down with no harm! That's a real problem for sure, a dire Attack on a Woman no less! This is so sexist racist ableist and ageist! We must take action to protect our beloved celebrities who feel so threatened with their bodyguards and personal drivers!

"Boycott of world chess championship 'would hurt women in Iran'"
Because who cares about them men in Iran, or chess, or anything for that matter? Every issue is an issue of sexism, and if there's no sexism, it's not even an issue, right you leftists? Fucking hateful scum.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 19:51

>>11
But guess what, most children have malnutrition only because their parents want them to
So you think their parents actually WANT their children to suffer from malnutrition? What kind of delusional nonsense is this?

Police brutality is experienced equally by people of all races
Police brutality is experienced equally by people of all races
Police brutality is experienced equally by people of all races
http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/098/108/61b.png

Sure, that's like the most important issue in today's media: The Lack of Lesbian Superheroes. Fucking douchebags.
So you get triggered by the fact that the media is talking about anything but "the most important issue"? Might as well demand the media only talk about the heat death of the universe, anything else is insignificant in comparison.

Why don't you leave that strange country instead of bitching on the internet, peabrain?
Because it's probable that any other suitable country would be just as strange?

Because who cares about them men in Iran, or chess,
I suspect you don't actually care about chess or men in Iran, you're just pretending to so you have an excuse to whine about feminists and how them wanting to help women is actually oppressing everyone else.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 20:38

>>12
Simple: if people in the poor countries want their children to be well-fed, they can always stop having new children. The fact they don't, statisticaly, stop, proves that either they hate their children or they're simply irresponsible and stupid.
Read about the "green revolution" of the 1970s. All the hunger and starvation in 3rd world countries are self-inflicted through overpopulation.

First of all, it is the "Black Lives Matter" activists who need to provide evidence of police racial bias. Accusations need to be proven, not just claimed based on some cherry-picked cases blown out of proportion by the leftist media.
Secondly, why yes there was a study: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/12/upshot/surprising-new-evidence-shows-bias-in-police-use-of-force-but-not-in-shootings.html?_r=0
But when it comes to the most lethal form of force — police shootings — the study finds no racial bias.

I am triggered by the fact that leftist media talk almost exclusively about these problems. These people must be paid to constantly parron an agenda.

No it's not, there's usually at least one country that isn't strange - the one the individual in question grew up in.

I'm not "whining" about feminists, I say "fuck those lying whores destroying the fabric of society". And feminism has nothing to do with helping women, it's a ruse to mask the sorry state of the economy in which a woman cannot just stay at home and has to go to work.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 20:50

>>12
Oh and one more thing: a leftist using a kind strongman-tone just comes across as funny, like a woman Rambo with guns and warpaint and shit. I doubt that's your real style.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 21:10

For comparison, here are some headlines from a non-leftist (and neither rightist) mass medium, The Telegraph:

"Prime Minister to confirm that 1972 European Communities Act will be repealed"

"Dear Graham Norton: "We fear our friend is in an abusive relationship. What can we do?""

"Donald Trump may be dangerously ignorant, but I understand why Americans will vote for him
Janet Daley"

"It’s not just Deutsche. European banking is utterly broken
Jeremy Warner"

"Mike Towell's tragic death forces boxing to look again at its safety procedures
Gareth A Davies"

Good God, suddenly, the world is full not of sexism, racism, and celebrity problems, but by actual real problems and events! How can anyone read this tripe while the milluns of poor childrunn in Africa are a-starving! How can anyone live based off reality and common sense, not some idealist bullshit in the heads of leftists and their paid lackeys in the media!

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 22:06

>>13
But when it comes to the most lethal form of force — police shootings — the study finds no racial bias.
But is that true of all police brutality? Just because shootings are the worst form of police brutality, doesn't mean they're the only thing that counts.

I am triggered by the fact that leftist media talk almost exclusively about these problems. These people must be paid to constantly parron an agenda.
So you think the media should be forced to work for free?

No it's not, there's usually at least one country that isn't strange - the one the individual in question grew up in.
Which they were likely forced to flee due to violence or similar.

it's a ruse to mask the sorry state of the economy in which a woman cannot just stay at home and has to go to work.
Women who refuse to work are just cucking themselves - they're making themselves dependent on their husband and giving up any potential to be self-sufficient. And the "stay at home mom" hasn't been a reality for the lower classes since the industrial revolution, it has nothing to do with the "state of the economy" unless you're calling for a return to subsistence farmers. If women staying at home are common, that's a sign of an UNHEALTHY economy - it indicates insufficient demand for labor. Basically, what you want is to distort the statistics to make it look like the economy is healthier than it is - you want to exclude women from unemployment statistics (by asserting they belong in the home and not in the work force) and thus make unemployment figures seem lower than they actually are. It's much better to actually fix a problem, than to pretend it does not exist.

>>15
So you think deaths from boxing (which is what, like one death every few years) is more of an issue that people dying from malnutrition or police brutality (at least a few people a year)?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 2:05

( FRANCE WILL SOON EXPERIENCE A MILITARY COUP.
It will happen immediately after the next election.)

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 13:05

>>16
But is that true of all police brutality? Just because shootings are the worst form of police brutality, doesn't mean they're the only thing that counts.

Read the fucking article, idiot, it answers your question quite explicitly.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 18:01

>>16
doesn't mean they're the only thing that counts.
Milder forms of brutality are only several tens of percent skewed against blacks, which is perfectly reasonable considering the higher level of criminality and violence exhibited by blacks than by whites. If blacks have a much higher chance to shoot a cop or run away, then it's only logical that a cop will try to handcuff blacks ASAP and search them. So yes, shooting brutality is the only thing that counts here. If blacks don't want to be searched or pushed or handcuffed as much, then they should stop committing crimes so much, and work on their image.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 18:03

>>16
Women who refuse to work are just cucking themselves - they're making themselves dependent on their husband and giving up any potential to be self-sufficient.
Feminist bullshit. Women don't need to be self-sufficient. They need a man. They need a home to bring up their children. Women are made to keep home and hearth, not to go out and bring money home. It's natural law, and you can't fuck with natural law.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 18:07

>>16
And the "stay at home mom" hasn't been a reality for the lower classes since the industrial revolution
It has been a reality for the middle class at least 50 years ago. Watch some fucking movies from mid-XXth century, you'll see families where only the father goes off to work. That's how you have a healthy, happy society. The socialists have strangled the economy with their taxes because they want to destroy the family and make everyone dependent on their Nanny State. That causes a collapse in birthrates and further decay of the economy which will lead to social collapse because there's too many old people and the young are fucked over from the start.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 18:23

>>20
It's really in everyone's best interest to be self-sufficient. The "stay at home mom" meme really only makes sense in the context of raising children, outside of that scenario everyone should be able to support themselves. Expecting women to stay at home is basically giving them permission to be incompetent and unabel to take care of themselves.

>>21
I'm talking about the lower classes, not the middle class and up. Only the middle and upper classes had the luxury of staying home. Working women were very common in the lower classes, as it was the only way for them to stay afloat financially.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 19:42

>>21
Which is a flash in the pan, really. Stay at home mothers are a very brief fad. For the vast, vast majority of human history, that wasn't the case. Children need far less supervision that the West imposes on them.the result is helpless little shits who are sick in a state of perpetual adolescence because they were never allowed to form any sense of independent action in there formative years.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-02 21:11

>>23
True. I don't know about other countries, but here in the USA and the Anglosphere, homeschooling is legal and you can opt-out of the public education system. Families should strive to be self-sufficient anyway, jobs and careers that you can stay on for 40-50 years is a thing of the past and labor will be heavily automated in the coming decades.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-03 2:06

>>24
It's not as easy as you think. If you teach the wrong ideas, you're kids will be taken from you by child services.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-03 3:13

>>25
I imagine that depends in the state in which you live in. AFAIK, most states just have your children take a test to make sure that they're up to par. If you check out the Website "Freedom in the 50 States" and click on "Education" all the states that are orange are your best bet.

As far as getting in trouble for teaching "wrong ideas" Varg Vikernes homeschools his kids with his wife and hasn't (yet) had trouble with the French authorities (surprising that France actually allows it). I imagine if TPTB start to crack down on homeschoolers, it'll occur first in Europe, then slowly in the rest of the West. Yes, it's not easy, but nothing worthwhile is.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-05 19:44

What's the next step of your master plan?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-06 5:58

>>27
Crashing this plane... WITH NO SURVIVORS

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-06 17:13

>>28
You're a big guy!

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-06 18:40

>>29
You for.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-08 19:21

Would bet $1000 on Trump losing dead srs

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List