MUSLIM WHAT!?!!

IF YOU VOTED FOR TRUMP YOU ARE A RACIST PIECE OF HUMAN GARBAGE. AND HAVE SET THE PLANET SPEEDING OFF THE CLIFF.

I HOPE IT WAS FUCKING WORTH IT

I can understand being conservative, that's a semi-valid, if retarded, position, but then going ahead to want banning Muslims is literally the greatest sign of ignorance, fear and pure unmitigated dumbness one could possibly imagine.

Banning the folowers of a violent medieval suprematist ideology responsible for 90% of terrorism in the world is only sensible. Islam is incompatible with freedom or democracy.

Oh, and Islam is not a race you stupid twat.

>>4
Islam not being a race doesn't make you any less of a racist asshole!

¤The Sharia is the supreme law.
¤The US Constitution is the supreme law.
You can only chose one.

>>6
Most Muslims in the US don't expect Sharia (I'm pretty sure it's not called ``the Sharia") to overrule the Constitution, any more than Christians or Jews can quote the Bible to justify breaking the law.

Trump knows what he does. He's smart, always got a plan. I bet we will see this unfold positively in the next few months, just stop panicking and stop being hysterical.

>>7
Have you read many Islamic texts on the subject? Because most of them use the definite article when refering to the Sharia. As for your assertion, look at the studies they've done in the UK or Europe that seem to indicate otherwise.

>>9

As for your assertion, look at the studies they've done in the UK or Europe that seem to indicate otherwise.

You can find studies that ``indicate otherwise" on any topic. But if you only pay attention to those that agree with your narrative, you're uninformed and falling for Fake News.

>>10
I read quite a few articles written by Muslims themselves, and I agree having multiple perspectives is always best for being informed. Still, calling news with a one sided perspective "fake" is pushing the boundaries of that particular narrative too far. If that were true, almost all news would be fake news.

>>5
Racism is good, it is a sign of enlightenment.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3Xcns0WcAIkc7X.jpg

lol

>>12
Being enlightened doesn't make you any less of a racist asshole!

>>14
Yes, I am a proud enlightened racist asshole. However, protecting the Western world from Islam has nothing to do with racism.

>>15
Western civilization isn't worth protecting if it requires inherent and systemic oppression of Islam.

>>16
It is Islam that has been exerting inherent and systemic oppression on all other religions for the past 1300+ years. Just ask religious minorities in Muslim countries how well off they are when even Christmas is illegal and people get whipped for not being Muslim.

To the contrary, Christians have been found to be the most persecuted religious group in the world:
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/12/28/christians-persecuted-religion-world-according-new-study/

So yeah, Western civilization is worth protecting. We did it at the gates of Vienna, we will do it again in the XXI century.

>>17
The problem is theocracy, not Islam.

>>13
What about all that Somali gang warfare in Minnisota, not a single person who died was a citizen?

>>18
Islam is theocracy, dolt

Anybody who supports banning muslims is supporting a racist, bigoted, misogynist slab of stupidity built upon white nationalism and unbridled hatred. Maybe they are just ignorantly fearful or too fucking stupid to care about racism, but that is actually worse.

>>21
You're a hypocrite and faggot. Hatred? Look in the mirror, you stink of it. You're itching to start a civil war. Go ahead, try it. Those of us on the right won't, because we know war is hell. Go and riot in the street, smash some windows, club some innocent bystanders to death. I dare you.

>>6
Trump threw the constitution out the window when he signed his unconstitutional Muslim ban

>>23
You are insane.

good

>>22
I tried to start a riot by screaming loudly and kicking this shop window but it couldn't break and then someone shove me in the puddle so then the riot was off. I think shop windows these days are bullet proof.

I honestly believe that progressives can join forces with ISIS, the cartels, and African American gangs to root out and cleanse the racists from America and bring about a new age of peace. The Muslim ban must be lifted and that wall must never be built!!

>>23
Do you also think that banning Nazism is unconstitutional? Because Islam is basically Nazism masquerading as religion.

>>18
Islam is theocracy. It is a political ideology more than a religion. That's why there are Sharia laws that Muslims seek to install in place of government laws.

>>21

racist, bigoted, misogynist slab of stupidity

I'm sorry, were you talking about Islam here? Because your description of anti-Islamism is awfully reminiscent of Islam itself.

Liking Islam is a hallmark of a brain-dead, ignorant far-leftist who invites his own oppressors into his house to pillage and rape. Learn some history before spewing your ultra-liberal bullshit.

>>29
AFAIK there isn't anything fundamental about Sharia that says it has to be implemented as national law that applies to everyone even those that aren't Muslim. That only happens in theocracies. It's really just a set of laws describing how Islam is practiced, similar to how other religions have things like the Ten Commandments, forbidding the consumption of certain meats, and setting aside a day for worship.

>>30

AFAIK

You don't know much do you? Go read Reliance of the Traveler and see what it says about the obligation of jihad. Then compare it Christianity that says "render unto Caesar..." meaning secularism is just fine according to Jesus.

>>31

Then compare it Christianity that says "render unto Caesar..." meaning secularism is just fine according to Jesus.

A lot of Christians (at least in the US) don't seem to follow that interpretation. Maybe Catholics think that way, but a lot of Protestant groups basically seem to think the Bible means whatever they want it to mean. Same reason they quote the Old Testament so much even though it's basically deprecated.

niggers are bad

check em

>>30
Even if it applies to only Muslims, it still supplants civic law.
And non-Muslims in a predominantly Muslim society are oppressed with taxes and discrimination.

>>35
Doesn't ``supplant" it, it's just additional laws you have to follow to be a good Muslim. It doesn't replace or create exceptions to civic laws.

>>36

Theft (stealing) is a hudud crime in sharia, with a fixed punishment. If the accused meets the 19 conditions of his act of thievery, his/her hands or feet will be cut off.

So what you're saying is that under Sharia a thief would be imprisoned in perfect accordance with the civic law, except first his hand will be cut off? That there is a nice "additional" law, sure.
That's kind of like Mafia where you're subject to the ordinary laws but you'll also be murdered if you leave Mafia. It's pretty telling that Islam also offers a punishment for leaving it, and it's also death. There's much these two have in common.

The whole point of secular, civic law is that it is the same for all citizens. If a group of people starts following their own laws, even without fully supplanting the common law, then that group of people is politically incompatible with the rest of society, a kind of state within a state, with dire consequences for the stability and cohesion.

I voted for Johnson.

>>38
SMOKE WEED doesn't make you libertarian EVERYDAY

When Clinton Made Same Argument as Trump Against Immigrants They Cheered

Blog/Politics
Posted Feb 1, 2017 by Martin Armstrong

The 1996 Bill Clinton made it mandatory prison time for any alien who reentered the country after being deported. It was Bill Clinton who made it law that any alien found guilty of virtually any crime even if legally here, they were to be deported. There were no protests. The media SUPPORTED Clinton. So what is going on here? This is a complete excuse to overthrow the government and to destroy the Trump Administration. That is what is taking place. Nobody said anything about Clinton.

There was an “illegal” alien who was brought here as a small child at the age of three. He grew up here and was married to an American and had 4 kids. He had a photo shop in the World Trade Center. A broker filled out the paper work for his business. After 911, he was arrested for bank fraud because the broker checked he was a citizen just assuming. He could have become a citizen, but never had the time to go swear in. He was imprisoned for bank fraud, served 5 years in prison, and was then deported. His wife and children were reduced to living in the basement of a friend. That was the Clinton approach to illegal aliens. They love Bill Clinton.

Where was the Media & protesters in 1996? Anyone, even with a visa or green card, are deported if they are found guilty of any felony even if they have a family here in the USA. There was nobody to help the friend I knew – NOBODY! If you return to even visit your family, that is another 5 years in prison. Where is the ACLU? Where are the protester? Where are the CNN, New York Times, Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS … etc.?

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/rule-of-law/when-clinton-made-same-argument-as-trump-against-immigrants/

Banning the folowers of a violent medieval suprematist ideology responsible for 90% of terrorism in the world is only sensible. CIA is incompatible with freedom or democracy.

>>1
that's what you get when only americans and russians are allowed to vote!