Andrew Anglin

The Jews really have it out for him. He lost the. at domain and now I can't even access the site on Tor. Never seen such a level of censorship in my life, Orwell would be amazed.

>>120
Looks like they did, now it's on .ai

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=5NIo17P6j88

The .ai address seems to be down. Did it get pulled?

>>123
It's out. Check status reports here https://gab.ai/AndrewAnglin

>>124
https://gab.ai/AndrewAnglin/posts/14008224

I'm amazed that it lasted as long as it did.

https://gab.ai/AndrewAnglin/posts/14032034

Apparently, (((Glenn Greenwald))) got Daily Stormer off of the .ai domain. The test for free speech is now if you don't support the right for Daily Stormer to freely publish, then you don't support free speech at all.

Tor barely works, but sometimes using .gq instead of .link helps.

>>128
Nobody cares about arguing these semantics anymore. People are pressuring domain registrars to dump sites that they disagree with. This interferes with publishing and, yes, you don't need a domain name to publish, but most people are not going to type an IP address (especially IPv6) into their Web browser to see content.

As a libertarian, I am okay with this.

>>131

There is nothing wrong with linking to an IP address from some other website.

Yeah, except most applications of IPv6 are dynamic. Plus, it's also better to send a link that is https://dailystormer.com than https://2001:0db8:0000:0000:0000:ff00:0042:8329 for example.

There is nothing wrong with working under a subdomain of a domain.

Until it too gets shut down.

There is nothing wrong with keeping bookmarks in your personal browser.

Web browser bookmark systems are incredibly shitty.

>>126
I don't know if it was Glenn himself, or just other people writing at The Intercept, but if it really is true, that's pretty fucking shitty and I'll never support Greenwald in anything again.

>>133
It is hard to believe it would be greenwald himself, since he came out in support of DS when they first got shut down. But then again, I have found him to be Jewish in his name and profession.... "greenwald".....

dailystormer.ws is now live. Let's see how long this one lasts.

>>135
Less than a week.

He hasn't said anything on his Gab account yet.

https://gab.ai/AndrewAnglin/posts/14321423

.ws is gone, it's official.

>>1
Obscene comic book artists in the 80s/90s were suffering the same kind of censorship in the USA.

>>139
Fascists don't care about being censored unless it's happening to them.
really makes you think!

>>139
Proof?

>>140
Anglin has supported free speech for everyone, he's said on multiple occasions that the censorship won't stop at just him and "fascists."

>>141
>proof
Check the case of Mike Diana, banned from drawing because his comics were too crude. http://bh-s2.azureedge.net/bh-uploads/2016/11/PeterKuper_ItsObscene-large-866x1200.jpg

>>140
The average fascist supports censorship of things that are destructive for society, rather than things that are threatening to the power structure. So a fascist would of course balk at censorship of healthy ideas while supporting the censorship of unhealthy ones. There is no contradiction there. If you find yourself asking what the definition of healthy ideas is, that only shows you have been irredeemably Jewish-influenced and your entire understanding of language is back to front.

>>143
What's destructive and not is subjective. You're basically giving a group of people the ability to dictate what you can or cannot think.

>>142
So an artist got jailed for making provocative doodles? I had higher opinion of America.

>>142

Check the case of Mike Diana

Holy shit. I'm surprised that they haven't tried to get Anglin on obscenity charges for The Daily Stormer, but I don't think he even resides in the US right now. That case against Diana was pure bullshit, even though his stuff is quite degenerate, it still should be protected by the First Amendment. Thanks for mentioning this, sad that things like that don't get much media attention.

>>146

Well, Mike at least can draw properly. I've seen far worse artists at deviant art, doing a lot of amazingly bad furry fanart.

>>146

I'm surprised that they haven't tried to get Anglin on obscenity charges

Jews don't like persecuting artists with obscenity charges because they want to peddle all kinds of smut themselves and have spent years making obscenity cool and acceptable (lots of Diana's work was anti-Christian and sexually perverted). But they still persecuted Anglin with the same outcome using corporate cartels, Diana was banned from drawing for years by courts and Anglin is banned from the www by tech companies.

Also, Diana was only hit with state level charges, I think the case would have got tossed in appeals because of the first amendment, but state courts have a lot of leeway when public opinion is behind them. Back then public opinion was pro-Christian and anti-child porn so prosecuting him was a breeze. Now public opinion is anti-racism, so you see people like Cantwell having their rights abused by the courts.

Orwell was literally fighting in spain and killing fascists, not defending their "right" to get support for genocide.

>>149
Orcuck was a fag.

>>149
True, but towards the end of his life he was drifting rightwards.

>>151
No, he was always against out-of-touch nasty bureaucrats controlling the lives of citizens and exploiting them. He was a supporter of the free market, the right to have guns, social welfare, and voting rights because he saw that as the best way to keep regular people free. Orwell never "drifted" from that, the big-daddy government was his enemy whether "left" or "right".

It is hard to understand in this brave new multiculti world, but back then it was possible to care about the citizens of your country and want them to be free and safe without regard to bookworm ideology. Orwell and most people from that time wanted everybody to be able to reach their full potential, not be suppressed by bureaucrats and their violent thug enforcers who represented some academic system of authoritarian government. That was a very British attitude because the British had spent centuries before that suffering through various inquisitions at the behest of insane queens so they trusted no form of government.

Site is live on dailystormer.hk, will it last longer than a week? Let's find out!

>>153
How did you find the new link?

>>154
Through Magic™. The Tor version of the site tells you the new address.

https://gab.ai/AndrewAnglin/posts/14491851
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Daily_Stormer#dailystormer.hk

Lol, the people on the The Daily Stormer's Wikipedia talk page are having an autistic shitfit over linking to the site on the current domain.

Wow Emir of Wikipedia seems like a real cunt and a nigger

>>153,156
Where does he get all the money to buy shitty domains?
And why don't others just buy all the other tlds before him?

>>158
Domains are cheap and there are laws against domain squatting. What they are doing to him has to look like the personal choice of companies, if they start doing things that can be easily challenged in court then the situation will likely snowball and he'd get his original domain back from joogle.

>>159

there are laws against domain squatting

That doesn't fall under domain squatting.