The Jews really have it out for him. He lost the. at domain and now I can't even access the site on Tor. Never seen such a level of censorship in my life, Orwell would be amazed.
Soooo a much larger portion of the Tor network seems to be blocking us than was previously happening. Also the new Tor release candidate seems to be crafted to cripple some of my previous hacks.
If tor relay operators can block DS, why can't they block CP sites and illegal drug sites? I think we need a lawsuit to see who is to blame.
>>6 You mean the IP? So if they just move the site to new hosting and don't give out the IP it can't be blocked on tor? Also dailystormer is zog-operated, they only got banned from the clearweb as a ruse to give Anglin goy-cred.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-14 8:53
>>9 Their strategy of being read by many goes against the strategy of being a hidden service.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-14 9:09
>>10 Then how do giant drug sites stay up for so long?
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-14 13:39
>>11 They don't advertise themselves everywhere. It just happens by word of mouth.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-14 16:03
>>9 Stormfront is in the same position, but VNNForum is still up, are you saying because of this Anglin and Don Black are agents, but Alex Linder isn't? It doesn't make any sense to ban them after so many years simply because a fat woman got run over.
>>14 Alex Linder's site is still up, so I guess going by that he's the real deal. This is like saying that Solzhenitsyn was an agent of the Soviet Union, no, these men are dissidents in our modern age and the system is tightening its grip in a desperate bid to maintain legitimacy.
Alex Linder's site is still up, so I guess going by that he's the real deal.
Does that mean Spencer is the real deal too?
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-15 0:10
Spencer speaks of things that the system would rather wish were not discussed. I'd say that they're focusing their attack on Angling and Don Black because they're the most unapologetic; the rest of the alt-light/alt-right are undergoing more subtle censorship through things like YouTube's video page jail. In the grand scheme of things, it doesn't matter, if you publish something that the system doesn't approve of, you're pretty much forced to go underground, just like publishing samizdat in Soviet times.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-15 1:19
>>16 Spencer isn't censored because he isn't "14/88 SIEG HEIL FUCK NIGGERS" 24/7 like the other CIA agents. Those guys openly tell their supporters to harass others.
>>19 .is is the TLD for Iceland, you dumb nigger. Anglin is known for this type of satire that apparently went over your head.
>>18 I used to think like this, but Anglin does this on purpose in order to force the system to drop its mask. Spencer might help to red pill some normies, but his milquetoast approach is not going to make many waves.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-15 15:31
>>10 It's well read because it's so heavily censored.
>>27 "your worst enemy is not Jews, White Man, but your own females." -Andrew Anglin
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-15 19:44
>>29 Except he bashes the kikes in every single article. Women are fucked up to begin with, the kikes with their feminism just them twenty times worse.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-15 20:04
>>30 no wonder he loves his Filipino jailbait so much
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-15 21:25
>>31 Yeah, Asia hasn't been as infected with the same destructive feminism as the West... yet.
>>32 Philippines, like Thailand, is full of child prostitutes pimped by their parents and other extreme horrifying degeneracy - as though it skipped the Western feminism step and went straight to the end game.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-16 5:24
>>27 Dude, Israeli Jews are based, the prime minister's son posts /pol/ memes and give no fucks. If the white race is to survive we need to drop this "jews are bad because they are smarter and more wealthy than me boo hoo" loser talk and look to Israel for thought leadership in our movement instead. Jews aren't the problem as much as SJWs, and the based Jews are leading the charge against them
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-16 12:05
>>32 Yeah, he attacks western degeneracy and then promotes self degeneracy instead.
>>35 Yeah, and so called "based Israeli Jews" also supported Rhodesia and pre-1994 South Africa, yet both governments are now defunct and the countries are now run by crypto-communist niggers with the aid of kikes like Joe Slovo and Ronnie Kasrils. They gave the excuse that the West told Israel to stop supporting these countries and they complied, but the thing is it was all a scam because the kikes also run the West. They've always played both sides. If Israel really were true and honest they would have continued to support these white European ethnostates in Africa and told the West to fuck off, but they didn't.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-17 1:04
>>40 Those governments had no chance of staying. None, zero, zip, zilch
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-17 1:22
>>41 Yeah, because kikes kept constantly attacking them and there wasn't Internet like there is today in 1979-1980 and 1994.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-17 1:24
>>42 Pretty sure they'd fall harder with the Internet.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-17 1:26
To add, there are a ton of pictures on the Internet of what happens to Afrikaans, yet most people don't care.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-17 1:30
>>43 Today's Internet is pretty anti-kike. Just look at Roger Waters and PewDiePie. If Rhodesia and pre-1994 South Africa were still around, people would be asking why is it okay to have a Jew ethnostate in the Middle East but not a white European one in Africa? Jews don't hold up against scrutiny of their contradictory claims, which is why they often resort to shutting down their opposition.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-17 1:32
>>44 Lots of people care, just that it doesn't show up in the mainstream. So many people have cut the cord of their television sets because not once have I seen CNN talk about the farm murders happening in South Africa, heard about it happening plenty from the Internet, though.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-17 11:59
>>45 They definitely would ask those questions, but that doesn't really mean something would happen.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-18 8:16
>>4 Hahaha weev got booted from gab.ai for antisemitism. Is there no end to the censorship online?!
>>49 No, he simply stated that the Jews have the internet in a ball-grip. He followed that statement with an observation that violence is the only way to literally BTFO Jews. If that isn't antisemetic I don't know what is.
I'm unapologetic ally pro-Israel, which is why I have been blessed by God. Faglin and his ilk can go kiss snot.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-19 15:19
>>53 Nice to know that you support debt, decay, deconstruction, degeneracy and death. Next time keep your mouth open wider when the rabbi cums, you got some dribbling off of your chin.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-20 2:43
People who stand against Israel tend to suffer misfortune at the hands of God. Criminal trials, huge lawsuits, career-destroying rumors, gangstalking activity... God is known to smite enemies of Israel with these and more. Be careful, >>54 God knows what you post.
>>64 Wow. It lasted longer than I thought it would under the .is domain. Did the Parliament of Iceland give the order to shut it down, or did they use extralegal methods as usual?
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-30 0:04
Can't access it on Tor either.
Name:
Anonymous2017-09-30 4:51
>>66 He refused to provide them with his address and contact info, so they shut it off for violating tos.
How did they managed to get their domain back? Anyway, America needs a Swiss-style bulletproof registrar, where CEO and shareholders would pledge their political neutrality. Otherwise such stories will repeat. And stormfront wasn't the first time: previously they have seized that site advertising movie criticizing Islam: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_Solutions#Fitna_controversy
>>73-74 Don's also looking to get a lawyer to go after the legal firm that pressured Network Solutions to shut down his domain. He mentioned it on his radio show about a week ago or so.
By censoring him, they've effectively made a man who would have otherwise been forgotten a week later into a martyr. I really wonder if these authority figures consider the repercussion of their actions.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-03 6:37
>>81 It's true. I didn't care about DS and hadn't visited in years until it got shut down like that. Now I make sure to visit daily and check Anglin's (((Gab))) regularly. It's actually an okay news source, like a more accurate Breitbart.
Name:
noko2017-10-03 8:29
>>81 I visited the site for the first time, and the content was so cringeworthy I stopped after 5 minutes.
>>84 No, really It had way too many maymays for my liking
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-03 14:22
>>85 "Too many maymays" is bullshit. Just accept that you don't like it because you're a Shlomo. Shalom!
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-03 23:56
You're trying really hard to force this strawman, but what are you actually achieving? If he really was zionist insurgent, and you called him out, what have you achieved? If it turned out that Uncle Hitler himself was lecturing to people on /prog/ as to why they shouldn't murder children, does that really invalidate his argument? If you're looking for good right wing journalism/propaganda/echo chambers, I hate to break it to you, but Stormer isn't that. Which isn't to say that it isn't feasible, but let's call apples apples.
You're trying really hard to force this strawman, but what are you actually achieving? If he really was zionist insurgent, and you called him out, what have you achieved?
There's always a fence sitting lurking who can have their mind changed.
>If you're looking for good right wing journalism/propaganda/echo chambers, I hate to break it to you, but Stormer isn't that. It has its place and purpose. There are other places/publications where they delve into the more intellectual side of things. Nobody is stopping you from seeing them (until they too get their domains removed!).
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 12:35
I like how it's coming back to bite Cloudflare in the ass during their piracy lawsuit.
“Mr. Prince’s statement to the public that Cloudflare kicked neo-Nazis off the internet stand in sharp contrast to Cloudflare’s testimony in this case, where it claims it is powerless to remove content from the Internet,” ALS Scan writes.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 12:47
>>89 Honestly I'd have thought cloudflare would be a little more strict with the type of sites it handles. But why isis and piracy sites are OK?
>>91 It didn't remove them permanently, but it did remove them.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 15:01
>>92 Cloudflare is neither a host nor a registrar.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 15:44
>>93 Correct, although with Cloudflare dropping him, his Website is then vulnerable to DDoS attack effectively censoring him.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 17:06
>>85 Yes goy, worry about the use of memes and pay no attention to the fact that it's the most censored publication in the history of the Internet. Good goy, a shekel for you.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 19:00
>>95 How do you know that their censoring this publication isn't an attempt by the mainstream to distract us from larger issues concerning the people affected by the censorship of Stormfront?
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 20:41
>>96 Stormfront is back online, so that's irrelevant. And all those members who are heavily committed to Stormfront and Don Black's project were still following him on Stormfront Radio which is hosted by Jeff Rense. Maybe Anglin can get in touch with Don about helping to getting the original domain back since he was able to get back his. At the end of the day, it's a good thing that it happened, because now we all can see how far TPTB will go to censor opinions that they don't like.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-05 1:06
You're missing my point. When that Google engineer released his so-called "Anti-Diversity Memo," what were the two forms of commentary you heard about it? To oversimplify things, they were, "That guy is bigoted," and "That guy isn't saying anything unreasonable". The vast majority of my peers, regardless of partisan alignment always said the latter. Because the fact is, unless you're a moron who can't think critically and can't research things without some third party holding their hand a` la highschool English, you would always probably default to the latter. And what does the latter choice entail? That you aren't against the idea which the Google engineer conveyed. Simple, right? Except we haven't even gone into what essay discussed. That's the issue. What did the Google engineer write about? What was his essay even *really* about? It was a feminist essay. It was, I'm serious! And not just a superficially feminist article either, in that obnoixious, postmodern way; despite the "libertarian" fac`ade (by his own words) he identified himself as, all he was really asking for was that men should be entitled to adopt more effeminate roles. That's it. If you were a true leftist, you would see this as an amazing thing, because, here we have a guy who aligns with the Right (basically) effectively universalizing a sentiment that had been popularly associated with the left. But the mainstream isn't nearly as left leaning as you would believe. Honestly, I disagree with him. When I read his essay, the first thing that came to my mind was that pathetic waste of space Chris Pirillo, who named his daughter Jedi. When I think of men in effeminate roles, that's what I think that entails--basically nu-males. His essay really should have been called The Nu-Male Manifesto, because that's what it was (minus the manifesto part, because manifestos are a very specific thing). By censoring that guy's essay, what Google actually *did* censor something, but not the essay in itself. What Google censored was the debate that would have manifisted itself were the essay to have been circulated without supplement--without the initial commentary. I don't think anyone at Google was thinking this when they did what they did, but I do suspect, subconsciously, that occured to them.
SPLC BTFO: Evil Jewish Organization References Removed from Defense Department Documents (((Jennifer Rubin))) Demands GOP Cucks Breakaway to Form Even More Anti-White Party Jew-Owned Sportsball Empire is Designed to Prostitute Your Tribal Instincts Canadian Faggot Claims that America Must Have Gun Control Because of Science The Vegas Shooting was Not Boomer Jihad – Real Shooter was Sam Hyde Opinion: Theresa May Should Keep Her Filthy Fucking Whore Mouth Shut and Mind Her Own Goddamn Business Four Dindus Kill White Man After Being Maced Feral Negro Shot Two White Men
Off the front page. Not even /pol/ writes like this...
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-05 23:11
>>99 So? Who gives a fuck? They're obviously doing something right since they keep getting censored.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-05 23:12
>>100 So are you saying that Richard Spencer (and to a lesser extent, stormfront) aren't doing something right?
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-05 23:18
>>101 Stormfront got censored, so they obviously are. They would rather Spencer not talk about the things he does, but his milquetoast approach will never push the envelope.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-06 1:37
>>100 What they are doing right is showing teenagers that there are people who can have fun and don't have to apologize for not caring about faggots/niggers/trannies/holohoax. Marxists can't be funny due to mental illness and pandering to victims, their only hope in the "culture war" is to shut down anything fun so that young people grow up thinking nothing can be fun and light-heated. Marxists are in a panic because they have ruined their own image and it can't be fixed.
I miss the good ol' days when porn was funny to watch. It's all gonzo nowadays--not nearly as endearing. I just feel disgusted watching it. The upside is that I accidentally won nofap Novemeber, because porn is just so awful.
>>103 Indeed. At heart, it's an anti-human ideology and mindset. It seeks to turn all of humanity into "golem"... soulless, mindless, directionless (until ordered) beings that live, eat, breathe and die and have no passion for anything or virtue for anything except towards their own servitude.
>>107 Yes. YES. JAV is the golden age of porn all over again. Although some JAV does succumb to the gonzo disease that's plagued Western porn these past two gruelling decades, the sheer dedication those nips have to quality commodity seems to prevail. I can most certainly appreciate JAV--when it's good. Their dedication to the art of True Pornography does not go unnoticed by me.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-06 20:23
.cat is gone. So much for Catalan independence (certainly not independent from the Jews).
Apparently, (((Glenn Greenwald))) got Daily Stormer off of the .ai domain. The test for free speech is now if you don't support the right for Daily Stormer to freely publish, then you don't support free speech at all.
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-01 20:06
Tor barely works, but sometimes using .gq instead of .link helps.
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-02 4:13
>>128 Nobody cares about arguing these semantics anymore. People are pressuring domain registrars to dump sites that they disagree with. This interferes with publishing and, yes, you don't need a domain name to publish, but most people are not going to type an IP address (especially IPv6) into their Web browser to see content.
There is nothing wrong with working under a subdomain of a domain.
Until it too gets shut down.
There is nothing wrong with keeping bookmarks in your personal browser.
Web browser bookmark systems are incredibly shitty.
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-02 6:09
>>126 I don't know if it was Glenn himself, or just other people writing at The Intercept, but if it really is true, that's pretty fucking shitty and I'll never support Greenwald in anything again.
>>133 It is hard to believe it would be greenwald himself, since he came out in support of DS when they first got shut down. But then again, I have found him to be Jewish in his name and profession.... "greenwald".....
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-02 13:48
dailystormer.ws is now live. Let's see how long this one lasts.
>>140 The average fascist supports censorship of things that are destructive for society, rather than things that are threatening to the power structure. So a fascist would of course balk at censorship of healthy ideas while supporting the censorship of unhealthy ones. There is no contradiction there. If you find yourself asking what the definition of healthy ideas is, that only shows you have been irredeemably Jewish-influenced and your entire understanding of language is back to front.
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-10 13:56
>>143 What's destructive and not is subjective. You're basically giving a group of people the ability to dictate what you can or cannot think.
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-10 15:00
>>142 So an artist got jailed for making provocative doodles? I had higher opinion of America.
Holy shit. I'm surprised that they haven't tried to get Anglin on obscenity charges for The Daily Stormer, but I don't think he even resides in the US right now. That case against Diana was pure bullshit, even though his stuff is quite degenerate, it still should be protected by the First Amendment. Thanks for mentioning this, sad that things like that don't get much media attention.
I'm surprised that they haven't tried to get Anglin on obscenity charges
Jews don't like persecuting artists with obscenity charges because they want to peddle all kinds of smut themselves and have spent years making obscenity cool and acceptable (lots of Diana's work was anti-Christian and sexually perverted). But they still persecuted Anglin with the same outcome using corporate cartels, Diana was banned from drawing for years by courts and Anglin is banned from the www by tech companies.
Also, Diana was only hit with state level charges, I think the case would have got tossed in appeals because of the first amendment, but state courts have a lot of leeway when public opinion is behind them. Back then public opinion was pro-Christian and anti-child porn so prosecuting him was a breeze. Now public opinion is anti-racism, so you see people like Cantwell having their rights abused by the courts.
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-11 4:00
Orwell was literally fighting in spain and killing fascists, not defending their "right" to get support for genocide.
>>149 True, but towards the end of his life he was drifting rightwards.
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-11 20:43
>>151 No, he was always against out-of-touch nasty bureaucrats controlling the lives of citizens and exploiting them. He was a supporter of the free market, the right to have guns, social welfare, and voting rights because he saw that as the best way to keep regular people free. Orwell never "drifted" from that, the big-daddy government was his enemy whether "left" or "right".
It is hard to understand in this brave new multiculti world, but back then it was possible to care about the citizens of your country and want them to be free and safe without regard to bookworm ideology. Orwell and most people from that time wanted everybody to be able to reach their full potential, not be suppressed by bureaucrats and their violent thug enforcers who represented some academic system of authoritarian government. That was a very British attitude because the British had spent centuries before that suffering through various inquisitions at the behest of insane queens so they trusted no form of government.
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-11 22:48
Site is live on dailystormer.hk, will it last longer than a week? Let's find out!
Lol, the people on the The Daily Stormer's Wikipedia talk page are having an autistic shitfit over linking to the site on the current domain.
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-13 8:30
Wow Emir of Wikipedia seems like a real cunt and a nigger
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-13 16:28
>>153,156 Where does he get all the money to buy shitty domains? And why don't others just buy all the other tlds before him?
Name:
Anonymous2017-11-13 19:41
>>158 Domains are cheap and there are laws against domain squatting. What they are doing to him has to look like the personal choice of companies, if they start doing things that can be easily challenged in court then the situation will likely snowball and he'd get his original domain back from joogle.
>>160 Yes it does. You cannot buy up a bunch of domains using an established brand to prevent said brand from using them. That's been an integral part of the agreement for years, ICANN etc. can't decide not to enforce it on a whim.
Roosh came out with a video the other day on the same topic https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=vEwx6LwqfZs His technique has really improved, that is probably hi most engaging video to date.
>>181 Decent video though I like weev and Anglin’s takes more. Roosh is too stupid and too insecure. Weev absolutely eviscerated roastie southern and Anglin’s most recent gab post is great.
>>173 I don't know why this is a surprise to anyone, Lauren Southern has been most likely working for Canadian military intelligence and/or the CSIS (Canada's CIA equivalent). She had a video where she was reviewing the SPLC hit piece article on her and she didn't even know half of the other people on it, which is why she deleted the video on her YouTube channel. Same with Tara McCarthy, I remember when she started out with her shitty little YouTube channel (originally entitled Reality Calls) with less than a few hundred subscribers commenting on Varg Vikernes' videos. Then she took a hiatus saying that she was going to move out of the UK and to the USA, then all of a sudden she changes the name of the channel from Reality Calls to Tara McCarthy, and not long after that her subscriber count shoots up. Possible CIA/MI6 asset?
I'm not a fan of The Daily Stormer nor do I trust Anglin or Weev, but it's quite possible that they keep getting censored and kicked off the clearweb not because they engage in "hate speech," or made a dead fat girl joke, but because they keep hitting over the target, and when you hit over the target, you get flak.
>>189 Why the fuck would Canadian "military intelligence" be involved with her? At worst she is con artist who wants money from emotionally vulnerable young men, which is unlikely as her content seems to be developed in the same way as Tim Pool -- ie. objectively documenting political happenings that the media is subjective on. Most likely she has genuine ambitions of being a notorious pundit like Anne Coulter.
The average person really does see sjw "activists" as laughable retards and the floods of savages into Europe as a bad thing. You don't need to have CIA backing to think and express such views, it makes sense that savvy young journalists see the way the culture is going and want to get in on the new cool thing which is dissenting against lame commies.
>>192 Try reading a few words further. It was pointed out this is the least likely scenario, and why was also explained.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 2:41
>>191-193 Pretty woman have always been used to subvert and direct movements, it's a tactic that's as old as politics itself. It's foolish to believe that it would be any different in the modern age.
>>195 Is it obvious she's a con artist, or is it obvious that you are the butthurt atheist in this?
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 3:27
If Lauren Southern was worth her salt with the "traditionalist" stuff, she would be married with her first child right now (she's 22 at her most fertile years, born in 1995, and I have video games that are older than this girl), showing young woman on YouTube homemaking, child rearing, cooking, cleaning, and basic home economics (because we all know public education in the Western world no longer imparts these life skills to their female students). Not jet setting around the world, meeting other shady characters I've never even heard of before. She needs to continuously be called out on this, not showered with views and money. Not that this will actually change anything, though, she's mostly likely working for Canadian intelligence and her biography prior to 2015 is cleaner than a level 4 biosafety lab.
What did she do between being born in Surrey, BC and enrolling into University of the Fraser Valley? Are there any childhood friends or acquaintances that can shed further light on her early life? Did she go to the local public schools? Was she homeschooled/home educated? Nobody knows anything, a big reason to be suspect of her.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 3:55
>>195 I admit I have never seen her videos other than her showing up a slut walk and on those boats in Europe. Checking her channel she does seem to be heading down the scammy road of molyjew, peterson, PJeW, some whores, etc. I thought she was just an alt journalist but I guess now she is a camwhore.
It pisses me off because these people must be aware of that they are surrogate fathers/girlfriends/etc. for people who need such surrogates because society fucked them out of their birthright. Yet they paint themselves as somehow "fighting" the society that produces their ability to make a living by playing the surrogate. Peterson is the most shameless at it, but they all act like psychologists in that they want to give you just enough cathartic outlet that you don't become disruptive to society.
If Lauren Southern was worth her salt with the "traditionalist" stuff
Where does she mouth off about trad shit? Are you sure you're not getting her confused with one of the other whores? It's too rich that she would be claiming to be trad when she has spent years globe trotting on donation money like a strong independent womyn.
The thread sliders are out in full force. Not surprising when it's pointed out the inauthenticity of their completely staged YouTube actress. Sorry, not today. (>>189,192,194-195,198-199)
>>204 Nobody here is willing to accept any woman being on the internet, let alone giving a shit about Lauren Southern. This isn't training-/pol/ where you pretend you are on real-/pol/ with the big boys, practicing your talking points in a safe environment.
>>205 Yeah, this is much worse than /pol/, because your posts linger. On a normal textboard, people usually take the time to think about their posts--think about their arguments, their discussor's possible responses, their grammar and spelling--but not here! Here, we have mods, even, that are so thoughtless, they correct their spelling after the fact with no shame. They don't even learn from their mistakes.
>>190 Why do you think I've been pointing out all the different people who are in fact that same people, persons? Dissociative identity disorder. Consider it a public service from yours truly.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 6:31
>>207 You love it. Studies have proven that you love it: people are more likely to remain engaged on a site if they are picking out nuggets of gold while scrolling in a sea of shit, rather than all the content being above-average quality. Even Facebook's newsfeed is based on this psychological principle, try picking up a book.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 6:40
>>209 The concept you're looking for is that of operant conditioning by means of variable ratio scheduling. It's well known that that means of providing stimuli often evokes the strongest results. Also, that line of logic makes sense, yes, in explaining why we like coming to this board, sure, but it doesn't make sense as to the cause of why the quality and cadence of posting is such.
[asking] why the quality and cadence of posting is such
is like asking why bananas are seedless. The board could have had any sort of posting style, but it, through the process of preferential selection, ended up like this.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 7:09
>>205 Neither do I care for this modern Mata Hari, or for /pol/. However, as much as you wish, women aren't going away from the Internet, because they're extremely useful for subversion. Best thing to do is expose her and discourage people from following her, and giving her money. (>>189,192,194-195,198-199)
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 7:12
And a banana could have had any amount of seeds but we selected for preference of zero seed. I get it now. Deep shit.
>>211,213 Is /lounge/'s seedlessness the product of selective breeding or the product of our collective unconsciousness?
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 7:20
>>211 Bananas are seedless because Lord God made them that way, much for the same reason that they fit in our hand as well as they do.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 7:35
>>212 Even Sargoy receives five figures a month on patreon and doesn't even have a vag. It isn't all about sex, it is also about giving frustrated wavering-libs a way to feel like "hey i like white culture and hate sjw but not in a racist way and individualism is good so im not dumb either". That's very addictive to people who have been brainwashed to think white pride and racism are a sign of an evil and stupid person, but can't help seeing that it is the truth deep down.
These individualists are very slippery, if you expose Southern as an obvious whore she will claim that she is free to do what she wants and then will start crying about sexism and you will get banned. Southern can bitch about trad this and that for attention, but she can throw the label off and claim she is an individualist at will. It's the trick they all use to avoid responsibility at every show of hypocrisy.
There is only one solution to this problem of dishonest sluts money grabbing, and we all know what it is: The Gospel. You acknowledge the existence of evil when you identify cam whores as bad, but you have to take that next step. Ask yourself, why is the evil here? Also, ask yourself why "quantum physics" seems to correspond with the kabbalah and Jews hate Jesus more than anything else. It is the devil, Anon, he tricked all of us.
>>217 She tried flirting with being more hardcore, but her beta-shekels flow was holocausted by patreon so she toned it down before her beta-attention flow got holocausted by twitter.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 7:48
>>215 That's incorrect. My hometown planted a rare heirloom banana seed and the resulting fruit was very seedy. I'm talking 99% seeds to 1% white flesh, that's damn seedy.
Southern can bitch about trad this and that for attention, but she can throw the label off and claim she is an individualist at will. It's the trick they all use to avoid responsibility at every show of hypocrisy.
Good thing it isn't about trying to "convince her," or make her own up to responsibility, only to discourage people from following her, and supporting her (she already gets enough of that from CSIS).
>>220 I meant that it won't discourage shit because the "individualist" can let anything slide. When exposed as a whore she will cry individualist and they will overlook it and send her more money to help with cyber bullying.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-06 8:05
>>221 I mean her fans are "individualist" and degenerate as well, trad is a fad these people fantasize about but trad requires religion and collective so they reject it for individualism when pressed.
Is this what it's devolved into? The Stirner meme was bad enough, now it's being appropriated by beta "alt-right" orbiters. How low the tall can fall...
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-21 18:08
Both .red and tor aren't working. Guess they finally got shut down for good.
>>227 You're an idiot if you sincerely believe that anything you have to say warrants a post in any form.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-24 7:04
Looks like it's down again.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-24 7:15
.red is .dead
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-24 7:53
Some Christmas this is turning out to be >:(
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-24 8:19
dailystormer.xmas when?
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-24 9:46
>>227 I'm sorry for calling you an idiot. I thought about what I said for some time, and I realized that I was being a big meanie. I only hope that you will forgive me.
I wonder how I can get into contact with writer Lee Rogers to talk about Brendon O'Connell being arrested in New Zealand. He last wrote about him back in 2014 when he was arrested in Australia on a bullshit charge.
Name:
Anonymous2017-12-25 4:34
>>238 Try asking Anglin on gab. Also, DS is taking submissions soon, so write it up!
stormfront retards are pathetic as revolutionaries.
there are MANY ways to distribute text articles without relying on conventional www or tor. ipfs comes to mind.
also you could distribute the articles as HTML files in torrents with an RSS feed to display them locally in any sort of GUI. there are some bittorrent implementations in Javascript. those torrents could be leeched, seeded, and displayed by the Javascript implementation, which could be run from your hard drive and a browser or Electron. of course the powers that be could take down the bittorrent trackers, but they want to do that anyway and haven't been successful. the only real challenge here is getting all the dailystormer readers to download the Javascript file / executable.
taking it a step further, this executable itself could be a fork of TOR and make a network out of all the users--all specifically for $PERSECUTED_WEBSITE as a generic way to avoid aggressive banhammers like this. someone here should write this for charity. not me though, I don't codemonkey for free.
>>245 Wow so true. Those methods you outlined have been proven to work ever so well, you are truly an expert on how to be a revolutionary. Thank you for sharing your expertise.
>>258 You are responding to a troll and am imposter. I was not exercising sarcasm in that post, as should be clear from the factual nature of the assertions therein.
