The Jews really have it out for him. He lost the. at domain and now I can't even access the site on Tor. Never seen such a level of censorship in my life, Orwell would be amazed.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-03 6:18
By censoring him, they've effectively made a man who would have otherwise been forgotten a week later into a martyr. I really wonder if these authority figures consider the repercussion of their actions.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-03 6:37
>>81 It's true. I didn't care about DS and hadn't visited in years until it got shut down like that. Now I make sure to visit daily and check Anglin's (((Gab))) regularly. It's actually an okay news source, like a more accurate Breitbart.
Name:
noko2017-10-03 8:29
>>81 I visited the site for the first time, and the content was so cringeworthy I stopped after 5 minutes.
>>84 No, really It had way too many maymays for my liking
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-03 14:22
>>85 "Too many maymays" is bullshit. Just accept that you don't like it because you're a Shlomo. Shalom!
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-03 23:56
You're trying really hard to force this strawman, but what are you actually achieving? If he really was zionist insurgent, and you called him out, what have you achieved? If it turned out that Uncle Hitler himself was lecturing to people on /prog/ as to why they shouldn't murder children, does that really invalidate his argument? If you're looking for good right wing journalism/propaganda/echo chambers, I hate to break it to you, but Stormer isn't that. Which isn't to say that it isn't feasible, but let's call apples apples.
You're trying really hard to force this strawman, but what are you actually achieving? If he really was zionist insurgent, and you called him out, what have you achieved?
There's always a fence sitting lurking who can have their mind changed.
>If you're looking for good right wing journalism/propaganda/echo chambers, I hate to break it to you, but Stormer isn't that. It has its place and purpose. There are other places/publications where they delve into the more intellectual side of things. Nobody is stopping you from seeing them (until they too get their domains removed!).
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 12:35
I like how it's coming back to bite Cloudflare in the ass during their piracy lawsuit.
“Mr. Prince’s statement to the public that Cloudflare kicked neo-Nazis off the internet stand in sharp contrast to Cloudflare’s testimony in this case, where it claims it is powerless to remove content from the Internet,” ALS Scan writes.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 12:47
>>89 Honestly I'd have thought cloudflare would be a little more strict with the type of sites it handles. But why isis and piracy sites are OK?
>>91 It didn't remove them permanently, but it did remove them.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 15:01
>>92 Cloudflare is neither a host nor a registrar.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 15:44
>>93 Correct, although with Cloudflare dropping him, his Website is then vulnerable to DDoS attack effectively censoring him.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 17:06
>>85 Yes goy, worry about the use of memes and pay no attention to the fact that it's the most censored publication in the history of the Internet. Good goy, a shekel for you.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 19:00
>>95 How do you know that their censoring this publication isn't an attempt by the mainstream to distract us from larger issues concerning the people affected by the censorship of Stormfront?
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-04 20:41
>>96 Stormfront is back online, so that's irrelevant. And all those members who are heavily committed to Stormfront and Don Black's project were still following him on Stormfront Radio which is hosted by Jeff Rense. Maybe Anglin can get in touch with Don about helping to getting the original domain back since he was able to get back his. At the end of the day, it's a good thing that it happened, because now we all can see how far TPTB will go to censor opinions that they don't like.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-05 1:06
You're missing my point. When that Google engineer released his so-called "Anti-Diversity Memo," what were the two forms of commentary you heard about it? To oversimplify things, they were, "That guy is bigoted," and "That guy isn't saying anything unreasonable". The vast majority of my peers, regardless of partisan alignment always said the latter. Because the fact is, unless you're a moron who can't think critically and can't research things without some third party holding their hand a` la highschool English, you would always probably default to the latter. And what does the latter choice entail? That you aren't against the idea which the Google engineer conveyed. Simple, right? Except we haven't even gone into what essay discussed. That's the issue. What did the Google engineer write about? What was his essay even *really* about? It was a feminist essay. It was, I'm serious! And not just a superficially feminist article either, in that obnoixious, postmodern way; despite the "libertarian" fac`ade (by his own words) he identified himself as, all he was really asking for was that men should be entitled to adopt more effeminate roles. That's it. If you were a true leftist, you would see this as an amazing thing, because, here we have a guy who aligns with the Right (basically) effectively universalizing a sentiment that had been popularly associated with the left. But the mainstream isn't nearly as left leaning as you would believe. Honestly, I disagree with him. When I read his essay, the first thing that came to my mind was that pathetic waste of space Chris Pirillo, who named his daughter Jedi. When I think of men in effeminate roles, that's what I think that entails--basically nu-males. His essay really should have been called The Nu-Male Manifesto, because that's what it was (minus the manifesto part, because manifestos are a very specific thing). By censoring that guy's essay, what Google actually *did* censor something, but not the essay in itself. What Google censored was the debate that would have manifisted itself were the essay to have been circulated without supplement--without the initial commentary. I don't think anyone at Google was thinking this when they did what they did, but I do suspect, subconsciously, that occured to them.
SPLC BTFO: Evil Jewish Organization References Removed from Defense Department Documents (((Jennifer Rubin))) Demands GOP Cucks Breakaway to Form Even More Anti-White Party Jew-Owned Sportsball Empire is Designed to Prostitute Your Tribal Instincts Canadian Faggot Claims that America Must Have Gun Control Because of Science The Vegas Shooting was Not Boomer Jihad – Real Shooter was Sam Hyde Opinion: Theresa May Should Keep Her Filthy Fucking Whore Mouth Shut and Mind Her Own Goddamn Business Four Dindus Kill White Man After Being Maced Feral Negro Shot Two White Men
Off the front page. Not even /pol/ writes like this...
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-05 23:11
>>99 So? Who gives a fuck? They're obviously doing something right since they keep getting censored.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-05 23:12
>>100 So are you saying that Richard Spencer (and to a lesser extent, stormfront) aren't doing something right?
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-05 23:18
>>101 Stormfront got censored, so they obviously are. They would rather Spencer not talk about the things he does, but his milquetoast approach will never push the envelope.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-06 1:37
>>100 What they are doing right is showing teenagers that there are people who can have fun and don't have to apologize for not caring about faggots/niggers/trannies/holohoax. Marxists can't be funny due to mental illness and pandering to victims, their only hope in the "culture war" is to shut down anything fun so that young people grow up thinking nothing can be fun and light-heated. Marxists are in a panic because they have ruined their own image and it can't be fixed.
I miss the good ol' days when porn was funny to watch. It's all gonzo nowadays--not nearly as endearing. I just feel disgusted watching it. The upside is that I accidentally won nofap Novemeber, because porn is just so awful.
>>103 Indeed. At heart, it's an anti-human ideology and mindset. It seeks to turn all of humanity into "golem"... soulless, mindless, directionless (until ordered) beings that live, eat, breathe and die and have no passion for anything or virtue for anything except towards their own servitude.
>>107 Yes. YES. JAV is the golden age of porn all over again. Although some JAV does succumb to the gonzo disease that's plagued Western porn these past two gruelling decades, the sheer dedication those nips have to quality commodity seems to prevail. I can most certainly appreciate JAV--when it's good. Their dedication to the art of True Pornography does not go unnoticed by me.
Name:
Anonymous2017-10-06 20:23
.cat is gone. So much for Catalan independence (certainly not independent from the Jews).