Intel: NSA Inside/Less secure Faster low-end chips(dual cores) Runs cooler in general
AMD: Cheaper 4core+ CPU Integrated graphics are x2-x3 faster Early ryzen crashes Slower, especially in 1 thread tasks Respects freedoms
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-24 14:04
>>1 >Faster low-end chips(dual cores) Even i3s are quad-core now, gramps. And AMD can sometimes cost more money over time if you factor in the cost of electricity.
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-24 14:11
>>2 >Even i3s are quad-core now, gramps I meant celerons/pentium which outperform all of AMD low-end in single-thread. i3 isn't low-end, its twice as expensive in general as cheaper pentiums.
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-24 15:00
Intel low-end: Celerons, Lower pentiums Intel low-mid: Higher pentiums,most of i3s Intel mid-range: top speed i3s,most cheaper i5 Intel high-end: i7s,top i5s/i5 unlocked Intel top range: i9, Socket-E CPUs(e.g. Haswell-E)
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-24 15:05
intel servers/workstations were simpler: Xeon E3 = low end single CPU boards, E5=mid range 2CPU board, E7=high end 4 CPU boards But recently they switched to bronze,gold,platinum.
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-24 17:02
Fun fact: the i3/i5/i7 naming means nothing from generation to generation. They are different designs, but the common name is 100% marketing. An i7 from a couple generations has nothing in common with a coffee lake i7. But people think they're similar.
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-24 20:46
>>6 They mean different pricing schemes. i9>i7>i5>i3>pentium>celeron
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-24 20:57
i9 is overpriced bullshit catered to soulless gamer drones.
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-24 21:10
>>8 Its basically the same as Architecture-E CPU which were typically with more PCI-E lanes and 8 ram slots boards.
Name:
Anonymous2018-06-25 7:21
>tfw chiplets don't scale AMD Tackles Coming "Chiplet" Revolution With New Chip Network Scheme https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/semiconductors/design/amd-tackles-coming-chiplet-revolution-with-new-chip-network-scheme There’s (at least) one problem: Though each chiplet’s own on-chip routing system can work perfectly, when they’re all connected together on the interposer’s network a situation can arise where a network tries to route data in such a way that a traffic jam occurs that winds up seizing up the computer. “A deadlock can happen basically where you have a circle or a cycle of different messages all trying to compete for same sorts of resources causing everyone to wait for everyone else,” Loh explains.