Environmentalism

Some people really hate the environment, I guess.

I posted about the environment on this site: https://bus-stop.tk/
Then they responded by posting smug anime reaction images, calling me a troll, insulting me, calling me a "/pol/ poster" and then deleted my posts and instituted a Japanese captcha. All because I made posts about the environment and sustainability. That has nothing to do with /pol/. I don't even go there.

What is wrong with people?

>>1
Even though you see kikes as a pollution on the Earth that needs to be cleansed, most people see that as genocidal rather than environmental.

>>2
I've never said anything like that. Stop trolling or using slurs.

Maybe if you were less of an "eco fascist" and more of an "eco" people would be more willing to listen?

>>4
Not my fault people are too stupid to understand what words mean.

>>3
Then why are people calling you /pol/?

>>5
So you are not a fascist, or you are a fascist but people should love it?

>>7
Do you even know what ecofascism means? Apparently you are conflating it with other brands of fascism, which are not the same at all.

Ecofascism is a term many people do not understand. They group it in with other things they don't like in an attempt to discredit it. Sometimes it is co-opted.

I guess ecological authoritarianism would be a better term.

>>8
Just checked Bus Stop. Looks like you got severely BTFO'd.

>>10
They deleted most of my posts. You can't even see what I wrote.

>>11
Let's face it, there's a place for discussing eco ideologues but it isn't bus stop because they are mostly fags. Maybe they would like eco fascism but they are too perverted and weebish to even know what they would like if their minds hadn't been warped. It's best to just eco gas them when the time is right.

OP, how badly did you get BTFO'd by this link https://fee.org/articles/the-myth-of-deforestation ?

>>12

eco gas them

stop trolling
you're trying to misrepresent my views here, aren't you?

>>13
boomer site by capitalists who are trying to justify polluting the earth and unsustainably using up finite resources for capitalism and consumerism

anybody can make a website

>>14
Gas them or don't gas them, no skin off my eye.

this website is just neocon shill garbage

check out this shit:
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Foundation_for_Economic_Education
this site is funded by billionaires who want to shill for their immoral business practices

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Foundation_for_Economic_Education

If somebody pollutes in an eco fascist soicety do they get gas chambered? Because otherwise if nobody gets gassed how can you even call yourself fascist?

>>18
stop trolling

>>17
lol. but still you are just as bad with your arrogant assumption that humans have an impact on the planet long term. If a few asteroids hit the planet it could catch on fire for 1000 years, like it apparently did 12k years ago, what you call a "good environment" is inherently doomed and unrelated to the planet's overall health.

>Each post remains on the site for only a day, after which, it disappears.
How can a site be so idiotic?
This is a counter-measure to reduce bandwidth use for large-scale sites.
Are they larping as 4chan clone?

>>21
It's an artificial constraint to foster creativity. Just how autistic are you kid?

>>21-22
That's how 4chan was back in the old days.
"Marked for deletion (old)"
And there also weren't 4chan archives back in the day.

>>22,23
It makes sense when you have lots of content and users, not with sub-10 users. It discourages creativity.
The website is a dumb exercise in futility.

>>24

a dumb exercise in futility

You literally just described everything.

>>11
I suggest avoiding authoritarian sites such as this. Instead use distributed or decentralised alternatives that are censorship-resistant. That site is worth nothing if they delete posts that they do not like.

THere's nothing wrong with being an environmentalist, but "deep ecology" and "ecofascism" are laughably stupid.

>>1
>All because I made posts about the environment and sustainability
Or posted videos like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgWmSUjDou8
Or used 4chan lingo like 'cuckshit'.
Or continued trying to start political discussions after being notified by users several times that bus stop isn't the right board for it.
Or posted a wojack.

Why would anyone call you a /pol/ poster and prevent your further shitting up of the board?

He's not a troll though!

He's not a troll though!

>>29,30
Redpill: We're all trolls!

>>28
Anyone who dislikes antifa must obviously use /pol/! Clearly there are no valid criticisms of violent thugs who use intimidation and are ideologically at odds with me. Their name is misleading, by the way.

I don't like /pol/. I've looked into it more, and many people just post edgy memes and frogs. Some people there even support stupid shit like libertarianism, which is like the antithesis of my views. And most people there don't seem to give a shit about the environment. You must be really confused if you think I'm the same as those people.

or used 4chan lingo like 'cuckshit'.

Cuck is a neologism that has transcended 4chan. It means a weak male. Nowadays, a lot of men are very effeminate, at least in the west. They don't stick up for themselves. They get into dumb shit like video games, superhero movies, or other useless shit. This is a serious cultural shift and it's a problem. Pointing that out is not /pol/ shit. Lots of people are noticing this.

Or continued trying to start political discussions

Oh no, how terrible? Yeah, I guess your board should go back to having 2 posts per week where people post nothing in particular and have surface-level discussions that don't really amount to anything. Critical thinking is scary!

Or posted a wojack.

One about disliking modern life. I don't normally post that kind of stuff, but that one in particular was suitable. Better than all the creepy anime shit that gets posted there, at least. Edited on 22/07/2018 18:26.

Body is too long to be processed.

Original Body:
>>28
Anyone who dislikes antifa must obviously use /pol/! Clearly there are no valid criticisms of violent thugs who use intimidation and are ideologically at odds with me. Their name is misleading, by the way.

I don't like /pol/. I've looked into it more, and many people just post edgy memes and frogs. Some people there even support stupid shit like libertarianism, which is like the antithesis of my views. And most people there don't seem to give a shit about the environment. You must be really confused if you think I'm the same as those people.

>Or used 4chan lingo like 'cuckshit'.
Cuck is a neologism that has transcended 4chan. It means a weak male. Nowadays, a lot of men are very effeminate, at least in the west. They don't stick up for themselves. They get into dumb shit like video games, superhero movies, or other useless shit. This is a serious cultural shift and it's a problem. Pointing that out is not /pol/ shit. Lots of people are noticing this.

>Or continued trying to start political discussions
Oh no, how terrible? Yeah, I guess your board should go back to having 2 posts per week where people post nothing in particular and have surface-level discussions that don't really amount to anything. Critical thinking is scary!

>Or posted a wojack.
One about being disliking modern life. I don't normally post that kind of stuff, but that one in particular was suitable. Better than all the creepy anime shit that gets posted there, at least.

>>32
You're some special kind of stupid, aren't you?

>>33
Great comeback, bro. You sure showed me.

>>34
Poor you. Are you going to cry now?

>>35
Is ignoring my responses and resorting to insults your way of saying you have no legitimate comeback?

>ignoring [...] responses and resorting to insults
Gee, I wonder where I've seen that before.

Still don't get it, do you?

>>37
You don't seem to get that some people actually have values. Some people care about more than dumb shit like anime, such as most of the inane posts on Bus Stop. People actually do care about politics. That's how the world is. I guess that triggers some people, but too bad.

>>38
You don't seem to get that you're are on the wrong board for that shit.

>>39
But diversity is strength! Why do you only want to be surrounded by people who are just like you?

>>40
I'm pretty diverse all by myself.

>>41
prove it

>>40
Says... who exactly?

>>42
Evidence is a tool of the hierarchical oppressive system. Smash the paradigm.

>>43
Umm sweetie, anyone who isn't a racist is pro-diversity. Are you a racist? So your community needs to accept people who are different. It's 2018.

christ, how fucking dense can one guy be

>>46
racist detected

>>37
Fuck all the way off, crossboarder!

>>46
At least 1.12 kg/l.

>>49
What's that in freedom units?

I've been watching King of the Hill lately. Did you know even in the early 2000s there were massivecucks who loved diversity? King of the Hill knew and made lots of jokes about it; if only we had listened!

>>51
King of the Hill literally had cucking in it. Dale's wife was being fucked by the Native American character.

>>52
Exactly. It was ahead of its time and a warning we should have heeded.

>>32

Anyone who dislikes antifa must obviously use /pol/!

Either that or they are a CIA agent or a QAnon tard. Ever notice that "antifa" is a European group of football hooligans who could not operate in the USA due to receiving 3 figure sentences for smashing shop windows in masks? If you think antifa is a real organization that formed organically you are a tool. If you don't, why even mention them instead of pointing out it is a CIA operation?

Even the euro trash antifa are 100% compromised by intelligence services. They are supposed to be anti-capitalist yet they support the mass-immigration that is going to give capitalism another generation of "growth" since the Europeans got too depressed to have babies. How could a group of anarchy-syndicalists want mass immigration under those circumstances? It is literally the last ditch effort to save capitalism, so why are antifa fighting for it throughout Europe? Stop being a retard.

>>54
Occam's razor and all that. I think antifa is comprised of edgelords who want to seem tough. I think that's more likely than some vast conspiracy.

>>55
That's stupid. There's nothing "vast" about the conspiracy, it is simply a crowd-control tactic utilizing the same techniques used to sell consumer goods. The average American hates communists and Nazis due to inbreed feat of authoritarianism and centralization. Do you think it is a coincidence that at the time when the average American was getting really sick of mainstream politics thousands of communists and Nazis came out on the street to have gay brawls? Don't be ridiculous, the "alt right" and the "antifa" are both fake movements meant to disgust regular people to keep them from deviating from the false choice of dem/repub. You really think the government wouldn't do that? That propaganda tactics are only reserved to sell toothpaste even though they are very effective at controlling people and maintaining power?

>>1

lol buttsecks fag

we are about to reach an information singularity where all perspectives will be "proven" true simultaneously with advanced evidence fabrication and procedural videos. An age of unimaginable violence will come.

this is so sad

>>59
this is so sad can we get 50 likes???