Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Cultural Degeneration

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 10:30

Many lifestyles lead to non-reproductive dead-ends: excluding reproduction or replacing it with simulacrum activity.
Any anti-reproductive trait should lead to its own extinction - at least in theory. Why these anti-reproductive traits emerge and why they persist in the world?

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 10:35

Sex Dolls/Robots/Pillows - lack of sex
Waifus/Tulpas - lack of emotional connection
Video Game Addiction - lack of fair reward mechanics in actual life
Incels - undesirable genetic/character traits
MGTOW - marriage perceived as unfair
The reasons are in environment encouraging these traits.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 10:38

Wouldn't it be a form of 'Stealth Eugenics"?
The environment producing such anti-reproductive traits is powerful enough to override sexual and natural selection(which doesn't actually exists apart from third world). it also doesn't seem to come from a natural source: its entirely culture driven.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 10:42

..And why its a good thing:
The incels/mgtow/pillow waifu enthusiasts are swiftly removed from the gene pool and these traits are diminished from humanity at large.
At least in theory:
Wouldn't this also work on LGBTBBQ++ Multi-souled genderkin that don't reproduce too?
Most LGBTBBQ++ types don't naturally reproduce. Their genes are supposed to be as defective as 500lbs virgin autists. Yet they continue to spread.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 10:44

>>3
Nope. Artificial wombs, surrogate mothers, adoption, in-vitro fertilization mean there isn't an absolute genetic dead-end..if you can afford it.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 10:50

>>5
That only means the affluent first-world middle-class or upper-class can afford it, and their descendants need to remain at least middle-class for their genes and cultural traits to continue.
Its a fragile and artificial system that only reliable for the elite, who both know and plan for its used. Come to think of it, non-reproductive lifestyle is easily compensated by upper-class luxuries and possibilities - such as surrogate mothers/IVF/adoption without significant expense.
Essentially anti-reproductive traits can only be sustained by elite upper-class wealth compensating reproductive ability.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 10:55

>>6
Which means non-elite masses don't preserve anti-reproductive traits(too resource intensive), only elite easily accumulate them, this allowing them to showcase elite non-reproductive lifestyles and worldviews, which creates environment in which such anti-reproductive traits are popular(by imitation of elite) and accepted(peer pressure and media osmosis) by the wide masses as normal.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 11:01

All media(anime/videogames are also form of media) serves as behavior stabilizer/conformer and promotes such traits due being simply a tool of expression for the elite, which has bias towards promoting traits of its own kind - such as non-reproductive lifestyles(which elite can easily afford), extravagant behavior(easily afforded) and undue self-importance(narcissism, due perceived superiority) all of which seep into collective unconscious by cultural/media osmosis(role model heroes, subconscious trait imitation, desire to conform to fictional standards).

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 11:02

>>1
The question is, how media/culture forms the basis of these anti-reproductive traits?
I doubt LGBT-Feminist-SJW influence alone can account for massive inter-gender alienation and mutual hostility. There have to be deeper psychological influences - these influences are coming from cultural narratives of $CURRENT_YEAR media and entertainment. They don't literally scream from the monitor "DON'T REPRODUCE", there has to be something subtle going on.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 11:27

Its a combination of factors:

1.Xenoestrogens kill sex drive(soy,plastics,water chemicals).
These compounds in sum also turn males more feminine, weaker and emotional.

2.Male-hostile media forms anti-male cultural narrative: feminism/LGBT as enlightened future vs Male-centric family patriarchy as despicable past.

3.Legal framework discriminates and targets males. Divorces, adoption/custody, aliments, rape accusations,etc. Males are presumed guilty by default.

4.Role model subversion:
Female/LGBT role models imitated by children/teen males. The archetype of hero is replaced or removed entirely as chauvinistic power fantasy.

5.Goal subversion:
Family life deconstruction and ridicule, showcasing dysfunctional families(think "Married with Children"). These create doubt about creating a family and reduce incentives.

6.Economic subversion:
Limited housing options and costs of child-rearing. Primary affects the civilized first-world, since "minimal acceptable lifestyle" dictated by media would not be afforded.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 11:52

The simulacrum of 'ideal women', a tulpa/egregore of sorts forms from the abstract ideas about forms and traits we consider most desirable with minimal flaws/quirks, subconscious desires and perceived reproductive fitness.

The anime 'waifu' (reified in form of pillows/dolls,but existing as unactualized tulpa) is an emerging competitor in reproductive sense: by showcasing reproductive fitness and driving sex energy into its host(tulpa) the sex doll/pillow/robot reduces normal women chances of reproduction. That why feminists are seething at lost potential, they're losing genetic material and genetic relevance(as they're driven to make children despite their cultural programming) hour by hour.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 12:08

>>10
Xenoestrogens seems to be affecting different people differently, if they have a robust genetic set selected for mass reproduction(R-selected) for thousands of years, i doubt they'll be affected as much as one living in developed/modern countries which selected for stable families(k-selected). Besides there are lifestyle factors(like e.g. not eating soy, filtering water,etc) that have protective effect and drugs/foods raising libido(e.g. garlic).

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 12:11

homosexuality is not genetically sound trait
https://www.livescience.com/2623-gays-dont-extinct.html

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 12:26

Say it with me now: the industrial revolution and its consequences...

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 12:47

The key factor driving this is birth control.
1.Abortion and birth-control enables non-reproductive leisure sex.
Abortion as last resort birth-control method changes pregnancy to temporary condition.

2.non-reproductive leisure sex is promoted as luxury lifestyle.
Media builds a hedonist narrative centered on 'sex-heros' role models enjoying unlimited sex and suffering no negative consequences.

3.This 'Lifestyle' allows females to live without stable partners. The natural counter-balances such as pregnancy and STDs are neutered by drugs. Birth-control alters key hormones, changing reproductive strategies.

4.Without stable partner, females tend to psychologically consider feminism and female independence as central cultural values. Hormonal changes due birth control may add undue stress and trigger psychological coping mechanisms(response to anti-reproductive trait).

5.Feminism is empowered by these women to promote anti-male agenda, both culturally and numerically.
This project enormous 'political clout' by associating female freedom/rights/independence with availability of birth control and abortion.

6.Now with birth control(and abortion) reducing birth rates, elite(aka "Job creators") feels a decline in labor market which it compensates by importing immigrants or using already present illegal immigrants as alternative to native labor. This is also cheaper as immigrants are far less capable of unionizing and protesting, especially if their status as citizens is question.

7.Country is forced(by elites) to accept more and more immigrants as native population declines with feminist policies and anti-male discrimiation permeating entire culture. Low-skilled immigrants tend to import back their own families(chain migration), which don't participate in labor market, instead creating strain on welfare system. This of course isn't sustainable, so anti-immigrant movements and parties try to stop the irreversible cultural/demographic shifts. They are of course not seeing the root cause(birth control), enabling the entire process to be supported and promoted(population replacement/stabilization).

8.Natural selection does its work and native population is displaced by robust R-selected immigrants which outlaw birth control and feminism using legal frameworks(as they're now the majority). Elites either conform to new culture to migrate to their own cultural enclaves, where it slowly declines as birth-control and "anti-reproductive traits" annihilate the genetic remnants.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 13:43

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 18:11

Civilization and IQ above 80 is not sustainable, because it leads people to do things like casual sex without reproduction or programming computers without reproduction.

Humanity will either revert to the hunter-gatherer ape steady state or go extinct.

That's just the way the cookie crumbles, deal with it.

Name: Anonymous 2018-09-30 19:23

>>17
Industrial civilization is not sustainable with majority being below 80-90 IQ.
because it leads people to do things like casual sex without reproduction

That only a specific aspect of specific culture where it happens. Its not inevitable path for any civilization and it only takes effect where leisure sex is without negative consequences(a fairly modern phenomenon).

Name: Anonymous 2018-10-01 0:01

>>18
Industrial civilization is not sustainable with majority being below 80-90 IQ.
Indeed, that's why low IQ is an evolutionary advantage for man. It prevents humans from doing things against nature.

Its not inevitable path for any civilization and it only takes effect where leisure sex is without negative consequences(a fairly modern phenomenon).
It's the endpoint of technological civilization. You can't have one without the other. Maybe naturalistic reproductive values are compatible with a 17th century Victorian-style civilization, but once people have iPhones in their hands, it's over. Good luck artificially holding back technological progress without being some time traveler that would have foreknowledge of its effects.

What's going to happen is the adopters of technological civilization (Westerners and some Asians) are going to die out then get replaced by noble savages who would end up making huts and spears out of the airplanes and data centers of the previous bygone civilization. And it will be beautiful.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List