What I am displeased by in liberals is that they never want to abolish anything, just "reform" it into something they control. This goes for such as the police who should be immediately abolished but liberals claim it is better to just full police with niggers and women who are even more corrupt and stupidly evil than regular police so it's ridiculous. Liberal politicians are are horribly thirsty and slimy always worrying about making sure to never really abolish the police as to appeal to as broad a base of pathetic middle management soccer mom style types who do worship authority.
Name:
Anonymous2019-06-06 14:19
Also liberals steal free speech, fuck them I guess.
>>14 The question still makes no sense. Government isn't an individual, it is comprised of many individuals each having their own personal liberty, but there is no gestalt governmental libery.
Name:
Anonymous2019-06-08 0:20
by HS Commager - 1945 The reconciliation of liberty and order is the oldest and the hardest problem in government. Liberty without order degenerates into anarchy; order without liberty degenerates into tyranny...
Name:
Anonymous2019-06-08 0:49
>>15 What if we replace all these individuals with machines? You said yourself there would be no gestalt governmental liberty lost
Why resist the economic advantage of automating government?
>>11 Uh, I'm talking about the potential money generated by free speech, with many leftist-controlled tech companies demonetizing truth-speakers how could it be considered anything other than the theft of free speech? The point is that free speech isn't free, somebody has to donate money to those who exercise it or they will simply stop.
Name:
Anonymous2019-06-08 1:29
Finally it might make a fiscal contribution back to society =)
Name:
Anonymous2019-06-08 1:41
What if politicians had to cover the cost of all relatively trivial legal adjustments
Name:
Anonymous2019-06-08 1:48
>>15 So there is no liberty for organized groups, but unlimited liberty for individuals? How could that be considered anything other than pure Sargonian Liberalistism (which was roundly rejected by the British public just a week ago btw)?
Name:
Anonymous2019-06-08 2:08
>>22 Nah, it's a duality.. uniformity vs intragroup freedom
and then extragroup (ie rights and priviledges afforded to government)
Name:
Anonymous2019-06-08 2:19
And banks these days... They'll charge 60 dollars a year to keep a savings account open And only mention interest if you're borrowing money
Name:
Anonymous2019-06-08 6:09
It's like paying 10% interest on 600 dollars that they never even lent, if you borrow it
I wonder if the term bankruptcy would've originally applied to banks doing themselves short back in the zero-sum days
Couldn't money in the bank these days just get adjusted for inflation, what with money printing.. where else would you put it? suitcases eh? Or call it interest and pretend it's something different?
"Au Venezuela, l'inflation annuelle avoisine les 2 millions pour cent" (in French). Le Figaro. 14 March 2019.
A necessary condition for hyperinflation is the use of paper money, instead of gold or silver coins.
