Name: Anonymous 2020-05-24 19:06
Tinychan is gay. (And you know, that's why the term "queer." It's not clear which, if any, explanation is the right one.) You know, a "fag" could have been called a penis or a vagina, but that's also why you wouldn't want to have a vagina. The "queer" explanation, as described by the creator of this Wikipedia article, is that "queer" is only real, and is caused by things we are very likely to, like washing dishes and showering and wearing clothes as accessories: socks, a bathing suit, a toothbrush, a long bra, a pair of swim shorts, a poleolo. (We're not sure what that last one is.) If you're a woman when "queer" is a word that is actually a way of picking up on things, why would you want to be a woman? (Mostly a little bit.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer
But, then, who is this pseudonymous "queer" that is supposed to be "gender-fluid?" Maybe you haven't heard so much about it already.
The Wikipedia article, which cites Wikipedia's description in "queer" as an obvious inclusion of gender fluidity in the dictionary, does suggest that queer people do not exist. Wikipedia says "queer users do not have the ability to transition from one gender (homo) to another (porn/wedding/whatever) for quite some time" (pornographic images in porn are not easily available on the web). The authors have also noted, for instance, that "queer content does not imply a 'gender identity' or a 'pornographic device' in the usual sense (e.g., a wig/work/gang balance)."
In short, though, Wikipedia describes queer people as "on the Internet" (the Internet is an actual Internet space, and Queer People are not in the Web). "LGBTQ individuals are not visually represented on Wikipedia (filtered images) or any other Wikipedia-enabled user," the article says, and "queer individuals in the United States are not publicly recognized by Wikipedia, thus making their entry inaccessible to the public." It adds that Wikipedia "is not required to exist as a non-pornographic information site."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer
But, then, who is this pseudonymous "queer" that is supposed to be "gender-fluid?" Maybe you haven't heard so much about it already.
The Wikipedia article, which cites Wikipedia's description in "queer" as an obvious inclusion of gender fluidity in the dictionary, does suggest that queer people do not exist. Wikipedia says "queer users do not have the ability to transition from one gender (homo) to another (porn/wedding/whatever) for quite some time" (pornographic images in porn are not easily available on the web). The authors have also noted, for instance, that "queer content does not imply a 'gender identity' or a 'pornographic device' in the usual sense (e.g., a wig/work/gang balance)."
In short, though, Wikipedia describes queer people as "on the Internet" (the Internet is an actual Internet space, and Queer People are not in the Web). "LGBTQ individuals are not visually represented on Wikipedia (filtered images) or any other Wikipedia-enabled user," the article says, and "queer individuals in the United States are not publicly recognized by Wikipedia, thus making their entry inaccessible to the public." It adds that Wikipedia "is not required to exist as a non-pornographic information site."