/prog/ - Node.js drama — Tinychan BBS

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 13:16

https://github.com/joyent/libuv/pull/1015

oy gevalt

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 18:21

Gold.

What kind of degenerate submits a patch for a change in comments and nothing else?

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 18:42

http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs655/readings/purity.html

Also singular "they" sucks. Long live spivak.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 19:23

>>3

singular "they" sucks

Go back to Reddit, ey-kun.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 19:52

http://blog.nodejs.org/2013/12/03/bnoordhuis-departure/

As of this past weekend, Ben Noordhuis has decided to step away from Node.js and libuv, and is no longer acting as a core committer.

Looks like we don't have to worry about JS, the community seems to kill off their own head developers in favor shitting on each other over github threads.

SOCIAL CODING

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 20:23

I haven't read the thread. Did he really quit node.jews over a bunch of pack of niggers shitting on each other?

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 20:27

>>6
https://github.com/joyent/libuv/pull/1015#issuecomment-29568172

I'm probably going to step back from libuv and node.js core development. I do it more out a sense of duty than anything else. If this is what I have to deal with, then I'd just as rather do something else. Hope that clears things up. Thanks.

Yup.

Name: >>3 2013-12-10 20:59

>>4
That doesn't mean I don't find the whole thing in >>1 absolutely retarded. Code speaks; if you want to submit code (with comments) in your preferred dialect of the English language that's fine as long as it's legible by the average joe. If you want to convert all existing code to your dialect and push those changes to mainline then fuck off.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 21:37

>>8
It wasn't about dialect, it was about privilege and how replacing him to their is about ``little by little working towards inclusion of women in tech''.

You know what? I'll go bitch about the use of the her pronoun in some obscure makeup and cosmetics forum.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 0:57

>>9
Why don't you just fuck off back to Reddit instead? You seriously can't be this oblivious.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 0:59

>>10
Did I miss your sarcasm? If I did, why should I go back to Reddit? If I didn't, what are you on about?

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 1:01

>>10
Are you the guy that never gets jokes? Or are you one of those politically correct people pretending they're the reasonable ones while they sow discord and point fingers?

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 2:10

I cringed while reading the comments in there. Faggot white knights will kill off everything.

Functional programming will soon be the last refuge of the white man after nigger programmers flock to FIOC and Ruby and Node.js and trample their white lawns.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 3:17

>>13
You are trying very hard to fit in here.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 4:54

>>14
I can hardly fit in you if you know what I mean.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 7:47

Haha, to be honest, that sort of talk weirdly turns me on.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 13:15

I find it ironic that LKML, which is supposed to be a horrible, insensitive collection of unprofessional, rude people, got a patch from the same people and is simply dealing with it on the basis of clarity: http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/2/930 .

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 15:45

Gender neutral language discriminates against those that are english-as-a-second-language. End the oppression!

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 17:16

>>18
Irony!

Name: >>10 2013-12-12 12:17

>>12
Most likely the former (no way I'm the latter). Sorry about that.

Name: VIPPER 2013-12-12 13:11

>>10,20
Nigger

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-13 17:48

>>20
It's quite alright. You are a decent sort, and it's not your fault you have a literal mind.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-17 19:01

Didn't something like this happen with Rails a while back? Am I just prejudiced because I hate them, or do Web Framework Communities seem more affected by this sort of rampant drama than others?

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-18 6:56

>>23
It's not prejudice, web development really does attract these kinds of people.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-19 3:05

>>23

Rubyconf Britain got cancelled due to a lack of nigger programmers.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/20/british_ruby_conference_cancelled_after_diversity_row/

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-21 13:05

Consider this: A pack of wild githubers.
Savage, slavering githubers nearing your repository. Trampling your gendered language. Raping your lack of commented trigger warnings.
And you can't do shit since they're politically correct. The githuber leader grabs your documentation and fucks it/him/her with his/her/it social media.
The primal githubers finally dominate your code base. They embed barbaric shows on youtube and you are forced to read their politically correct comments on google+.
Such is the downfall of social coding.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-27 5:20

>>26

downfall of social coding.

Called as such, was social coding ever not downfallen? From where I stand, all the good parts of social coding (distributed backups, forkability, public feature discussions, ``patches welcome'') have been available since... hell, since a certain game Hacked together over the Net was in early development.

Name: Anonymous 2013-12-27 22:55

>>27
It's a fad, but that doesn't stop me from abusing the free hosting their sites provide.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 19:04

>>3
tl;dr

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 20:20

>>25
This is left fascism. Why are white men tolerating this hate? There is nothing wrong about all speakers being white men. After all, Britain is a predominantly white country and programming is a predominantly male profession. They should have went ahead and had the meetup instead of paying attention to left fascists on Twatter.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 20:59

>>1
go back there

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 21:29

>>25
This is left fascism. Why are white men tolerating this hate? There is nothing wrong about all speakers being white men. After all, Britain is a predominantly white country and programming is a predominantly male profession. They should have went ahead and had the meetup instead of paying attention to left fascists on Twatter.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 21:45

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
I claim these dubz in the name of the United States of America
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 23:17

>>32
Britain is about 95% white. Globally, about 92% of programmers are male. Assuming these percentages are representative of the total British programming population, then one would expect that a representative sample of British programmers would have a (1-(0.95^N)) chance of being 100% white, and a (1-(0.92^N)) chance of being 100% male, where N is the size of the sample.

The article indicates a sample size of N = 15. This sample is reported to consist entirely of white males. The probability of this sample being all-male is 54%. The chance of this sample being all-white is 71%. The chance of the sample being BOTH all-white and all-male is 38%. Which means, there is a 62% chance of discrimination being involved somewhere along the line.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 0:53

le necromancy sage

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 13:45

>>34
95%? More like 80% now, and around 50% in the City area.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 13:47

>>34
And that doesn't prove shit. Besides, there is no law against white people meeting and talking.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 17:55

>>37

And that doesn't prove shit.

You can't ``prove" anything with regards to probability, unless the probability is actually 100% or 0% exactly. But you can determine what the probability of something being true is.

Besides, there is no law against white people meeting and talking.

Moving the goalpost. I never claimed that they ``broke the law", just that there are signs that non-whites and non-males are discriminated against. Just because you don't ``break the law" doesn't mean you didn't do anything wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 18:47

>>38
Discrimination isn't wrong. Bluebirds with bluebirds, buzzards with buzzards, so to speak. No one prevents Pakistanians or Indians from hav ing their own meetups. Whites have a full moral right to enjoy company of other whites. To forbid tha is racism

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 20:31

>>39

No one prevents Pakistanians or Indians from hav ing their own meetups. Whites have a full moral right to enjoy company of other whites.

I don't think that is acceptable unless it's a meetup relating to that culture or ethnicity. If it's a professional meetup, I don't consider it remotely acceptable. Calling it a programmers' meetup is a lie in that case, they might as well say what they mean and call it a ``White programmers' meetup".

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 22:14

>>40
Nothing wrong with a whute prograammers meetup. Not everybody has to like your far-left ideology.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 22:44

>>41
Then call it what it is and stop being such a cuck about it.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-22 0:57

>>34

Britain is about 95% white. Globally, about 92% of programmers are male. Assuming these percentages are representative of the total British programming population, then one would expect that a representative sample of British programmers would have a (1-(0.95^N)) chance of being 100% white, and a (1-(0.92^N)) chance of being 100% male, where N is the size of the sample.
The article indicates a sample size of N = 15. This sample is reported to consist entirely of white males. The probability of this sample being all-male is 54%. The chance of this sample being all-white is 71%. The chance of the sample being BOTH all-white and all-male is 38%. Which means, there is a 62% chance of discrimination being involved somewhere along the line.

0.95^N is the probability of the N-sized group all being white. 0.92^N is the probability of being all male. (0.95*0.92)^N is probability of all white males. (1 - (0.92*0.95)^N) is the probability of at least one non-white or non-male in the group, which is 86.7% where N = 15.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-22 3:04

Dubs

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-23 9:04

>>43

The article indicates a sample size of N = 15

very representative

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-23 9:48

>>45
What was that post supposed to prove, exactly? That you're retarded......?

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-23 10:30

>>46
yes

Name: Ellipsis and Dots Police 2017-01-23 13:14

>>46
What are those dots supposed to do, exactly?

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-23 21:33

>>48
They're to prevent Russians from hacking her post.

Node.js drama

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 13:16

2 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 18:21

3 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 18:42

4 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 19:23

5 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 19:52

6 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 20:23

7 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 20:27

8 Name: >>3 2013-12-10 20:59

9 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-10 21:37

10 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 0:57

11 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 0:59

12 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 1:01

13 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 2:10

14 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 3:17

15 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 4:54

16 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 7:47

17 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 13:15

18 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 15:45

19 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-11 17:16

20 Name: >>10 2013-12-12 12:17

21 Name: VIPPER 2013-12-12 13:11

22 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-13 17:48

23 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-17 19:01

24 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-18 6:56

25 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-19 3:05

26 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-21 13:05

27 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-27 5:20

28 Name: Anonymous 2013-12-27 22:55

29 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 19:04

30 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 20:20

31 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 20:59

32 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 21:29

33 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 21:45

34 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-20 23:17

35 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 0:53

36 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 13:45

37 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 13:47

38 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 17:55

39 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 18:47

40 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 20:31

41 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 22:14

42 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-21 22:44

43 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-22 0:57

44 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-22 3:04

45 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-23 9:04

46 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-23 9:48

47 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-23 10:30

48 Name: Ellipsis and Dots Police 2017-01-23 13:14

49 Name: Anonymous 2017-01-23 21:33