The NSA has that powerI'll wait till snowden confirms it.
smartShows how serious you are about this. At least call it something respectable like ``intelligent'' since that's what it will have to literally be if it were able to program on its own as programming isn't a quantitative thing that can be automated by machines.
It has also been proven that any cipher with the perfect secrecy property must use keys with effectively the same requirements as OTP keys.[3] However, practical problems have prevented one-time pads from being widely used.
recent usageDo you count 1983 as recent? You imply that about 10 years is enough to make quoting with `>' legitimate in your eyes, and the following:
Witnesses have testified that Jim Jones (like a few other professional faith-healers) used shills part of the time...
int a[5];
int i; // i is currently undefined
scanf("%u", &i); // i can now be any value.
a[i] = 3; // i's type does not contain a predicate implying 0 <= i < 5, so this will signal an error.
int a[5];
int i; // i is undefined
scanf("%d", &i); // i is some value
if(0 <= i && i < 5)
{
// within this block, i satisfies the predicate, 0 <= i && i < 5
a[i] = 3; // length of a is 5, so i is safe.
}
printf("%d\n", a[i]); // i is not safe in this scope.
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
le pedophile sage
a's type (int*) would store the information of its size. (Why would i store that?)malloc(), etc to be constructs rather than functions, but much of the type and bounds checking could be made transparent for most programs that wouldn't make LAC go on a shooting spree.vectors do not fucking count) this pretty easily, but it doesn't. I hope you didn't cite all those posts by hand.le pedophile sage
if(my runtime check here)
{
// respond with an error, or drop the message, or whatever
}
else
{
// handle it
}
I hope you didn't cite all those posts by hand.Some tasks must be done by hand.
le pedophile sage
And anyway, I started that just to annoy one /g/ro after the CAPTCHA was implemented./g/ros come and go, they are like insects. We're the ones who have to deal with your terrible shitposts. Is that what you want to do, to hurt your friends?
test'>test
test
This behavior correlates with the use of sage as an insult.No, no, no, NO. Would you bump a thread about Common Lisp interpreters in Scheme with ``fuk u faget XD''? I wouldn't, but sometimes you can't resist the temptation to reply to a provocating post. Obviously, you can't tell the other party to continue this on /lounge/, so you reply with a sage. That way, you won't disappoint someone who just opened /prog/ and is eagerly waiting for new VIP quality responses in that thread you just took a shit on.
People here try to give sage a proper use
Changes so far to OpenSSL 1.0.1g since the 11th include:
* Splitting up libcrypto and libssl build directories
* Fixing a use-after-free bug
* Removal of ancient MacOS, Netware, OS/2, VMS and Windows build junk
* Removal of “bugs” directory, benchmarks, INSTALL files, and shared library goo for lame platforms
* Removal of most (all?) backend engines, some of which didn’t even have appropriate licensing
* Ripping out some windows-specific cruft
* Removal of various wrappers for things like sockets, snprintf, opendir, etc. to actually expose real return values
* KNF of most C files
* Removal of weak entropy additions
* Removal of all heartbeat functionality which resulted in Heartbleed
Terrence Andrew Davis
* Fixing a use-after-free bugthese guys...