- Lightweight, easy as piss to embed - Do your native engine stuff in C and wield it like a god in Lua - Perfect for live coding - Do whatever the fuck you want whenever you want - Kikes can't stop you
ONE WORD: THE FORCED FLUSHING OF CACHE. THREAD PREEMPTED.
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-17 2:07
Brainfuck programming - Lightweight, easy as poo to implement - Do your native engine stuff in a state machine and wield it like a god in Brainfuck - Perfect for looking cool because your screen is filled with random gibberish - Do whatever the fuck you want whenever you want - The Sussman can't stop you
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-17 2:15
Java programming - Heavyweight, easy as new ResourceAllocatorFactory().createClassLoaderConfiguration().instantiate().enableConfiguration(ResourceLoader.getResourceAsStream("EngineBean.xml")); to embed other things in - Do your native engine stuff in XML and wield it like a god in Java - Perfect for developing scalable, best-practice, real-time shared enterprise application web framework service bus implementations - Do the same thing over and over again, from 9 to 5 (unless you've got a deadline coming up) - Oracle can't stop you.
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-17 2:22
Bonerlang programming - Lightweight, easy as piss to ejaculate - Do your native engine stuff in Erlang and wield it like your penis in Bonerlang - Perfect for live boning - Do whomever the fuck you want whenever you want - Vaginas can't stop you
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-17 2:26
TempleOS programming - Lightweight, easy as piss to install - Do your native engine stuff in HolyC, find God in TempleOS's PRNG. - Perfect for knowing, loving, and obeying God - Do whatever the fuck God wants, whenever He wants - Unbelievers can't stop you
Copying >>1-san's format and making jokes with it - Short, easy as piss to emulate - Make your jokes in the comment box, post them like a god on /prog/ - Perfect for EXPERT PROGRAMMING - Copy-paste and say whatever the fuck you want, whenever you want - >>1-san can't stop you
- I like what I am seeing. - This board is a Good Board. - Something about kikes again.
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-17 2:46
COBOL PROGRAMMING - COMMON, BUSINESS-ORIENTED, EASY AS PISS TO HANDLE RECORDS - HAVE THE STANDARDS COMMITTEE DEFINE YOUR NATIVE ENGINE STUFF, IMPLEMENT IT LIKE A MANAGER IN COBOL - PERFECT FOR WRITING FILES AS RECORDS - DO WHAT THE FLOW DIAGRAMS FOR THE PROCEDURE DICTATE, IN THE 60S - Y2K CAN'T STOP YOU
Will the Luakit browser ever be worked on again? I'm afraid of it being insecure because of old code and not working with websites of the future, but I like it a lot.
The only relation with ECMAScript is that Lua OOP is also prototype-based.
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-17 14:52
>>20 a) It can't be more simple than Scheme or in fact even pyshit/javashit/rubyonballs b) It can't be easier to integrate it in your program than dlsym (or even guile)
>>22 Tsk, and you eat out your mother with that mouth?
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-17 16:30
>>24 It is, and in fact, most people never used prefix notation before and find the use parenthesis in Lisp something annoying. I know that this fact is difficult to accept for someone special like you, but for a nonprogrammer do you honestly think that this: (cond ((> x 0) 0) ((= x 0) 1) ((< x 0) 2))
is simpler than this: if x>0 then return 0 elseif x==0 then return 1 elseif x<0 then return 2 end
(both python and javascript are also used for scripting in game engines)
>>20,26 Why are non-programmers relevant if the discussion is about the merits of programming languages? Non-programmers can't read a certain programming language, yeah. They don't have to, because they aren't programmers. Why do they matter?
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-17 17:26
I agree with >>27-sama, programming languages are for programmers, even if they have easy syntax the user will not be able to do shit because xhe does not know programming
>>28 Will you stop with your fucking xhe/ey faggotry? Either use they/them or rewrite your sentences with proper fucking English.
Example:
I agree with >>27-sama, programming languages are for programmers. Even if they have easy syntax one will not be able to do shit if one does not know programming.
This is a QUALITY COMPUTING internet community. We do LISP (SCHEME and COMMON LISP) and HARDCORE QUALITY UNIX (HARDCORE QUALITY UNIX NOT JUST ``unix''). lua is not QUALITY. It takes no INTELLIGENCE to use and understand. We do not use winblows, muc, or loonix. We PROGRAM not ``code'', we are PROGRAMMERS not ``coders'', we make PROGRAMS not ``apps''. Our PROGRAMMING is a SKILL, ART, and SCIENCE. We are superior to corporations and their code monkeys
>>26 I'm pretty sure ``simple'' here means linguistically simple. You only need a very small set of special forms, function application for non-special form, some way(s) to extend the set of special forms and you've got yourself a Scheme!
Lua/javashit/rubyonfail/FIOC are not simpler than Scheme. What people mean by them being simple is simply that they happen fit the common goy's inflexible and closed mind better.
>>31 basically yes, goy's who for example code NPC's
By the way, you don't program in LISP: you structure data in LISP. Real programmers program programs in, for example, Agda.
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-17 22:28
I started off by embedding Lisp using ECL. I then embedded scheme using s7 scheme. When I got tired of masturbating, I embedded Lua and never bothered with the Lisp-faggotry ever again.
Lua is a multi-paradigm, get shit done language. Lisp is a "oh look at me and my Lisp waifu" language for wanking yourself.
I am not a ``coder'', I organize s-expressions 8==D~ ~~
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-18 0:21
I put in a javascript engine because I got told to do so at work. Because I have a job.
Has Lua or Scheme ever gotten you a job?
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-18 0:52
Lisp isn't bad. I've embedded and used it before: http://imgur.com/a/BOd3X I just moved away from it. Lua was easier to embed and has all the language features I need.
using winblows using winblows XP[b]!!!!![/b] back to le /g/ normalfag
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-18 1:49
>>40 I may be many things, but I am definitely not a normalfag. Also, not that any of this shit matters, but: - those screenshots are from 2009, but even if someone is still using XP, who the fuck cares? - you should be more concerned with the programs you are writing that what OS you are running
>>42 My dev machines run Winblows 7 and 8. I really don't think this question is relevant though. I definitely don't think they are better or worse than anything else, I just want the OS to work and get out of my way. I wasted months years ago playing around with Linux, but I realized I wasn't interested enough in exactly what kernel my hardware was running. I just wanted to write programs, I wanted my hardware to work, and I wanted a stable API to talk to my hardware. Linux could never quite get those 2 last things right. My programming computers never go online. I use Qt Creator as an IDE (it invokes the VS Express compiler), although my recent stuff doesn't use the Qt library. I really like the live coding environments that Emacs and Squeak Smalltalk provide, so I built a live coding environment of my own based on Lua, and I spend a lot of time in that. Lua has excellent introspection facilities which I use to bring up function definitions and modify them live.
>>47,48 Yeah, back to /g/ you fucking ``coder''. Winblows, lua, LOONIX!. You cant get anything fucking right.
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-18 20:25
>>49 This is not a sekret club. If ey can do neato things using lua, winblos, and loonix, then I enjoy hearing about it. Computers and software are but a medium for crafting art. The material is not important. It's what you do with it.
Name:
Anonymous2014-04-18 20:30
>>49 What did you get right, kike? Is your greatest accomplishment in life that you made the right choice of OS and programming language? What the fuck are you even doing on a board about programming, if that is all you are ever going to talk about?
>>50,51 Programming sure does have some certain sense of aesthetics, but so does math, or physics, or pretty much every fucking thing else. They are just similar to ``crafting art'' in only some surficial aspects. It is not ``crafting art''. Programming in its most fundamental sense is just only about CONJURING computations/formal languages using formal languages.
tl;dr please back to your >>>/g/``dailyhebrewthread''. Leave us /prague/riders masturbating in peace.
>>58 enjoy your coprotelephagolytic paratropoholotarskimorphisms
Name:
Anonymous2016-11-16 20:11
>>22 At least Lua can read from stdin without needing 5 lines of code and a third party library.
>>27 By programmers they basically mean people who program as an occupation or at least a major hobby. Languages like Lua allow people with little programming background to do scripting.
