>>6 On the other hand, it is traditional to have a BBCODE test thread. I think I will use this one. TESTRAMP
This BBcode works fine in <Preview>. Let's see how it works in after the quote.
TESTRAMP
Well, I say it was fine, but actually, the `BBCODE' stylization was broken except for the first superscript tag, so I removed it. Let's see how the rest works.
Dearest Admin-chama, can you pretty please with sugar on top change the CSS for .spoiler from display: inline-block; to display: inline; so that my spoiler ramps are beautiful, sexy ramps instead of just pitiful, ugly blocks?
Yes, that's how it was on w4ch. As a side note, Shiichan keeps all the CSS in style instead of making a new class, so it ends up generating lots of useless data. By making a post full of nothing by spoiler tags, you could make threads that are 50+MBs large. Useless shit like that takes up a great deal of space in the archives.
Name:
Anonymous2014-05-07 23:42
>>18 I should really compress the html tags in posts. I was wondering how /prog/ could be 1.5GB when all the other boards were between 5-60MB.
I put it off since there were so many posts with malformed html. I think multiline quoting was the primary source for missing tags.
Name:
Anonymous2014-05-07 23:53
>>19 Multiline quotes shouldn't have caused any missing tags though. It was a hack with the span nesting order.
My expert shiichan nested quote mastery will never be appreciated again
Name:
Anonymous2014-05-08 0:33
>>19 More specifically, 526 spoiler tags fit in a post, the HTML is 193 characters long, so a sagebomb from >>2-999 makes a little under 100MB of useless <span class="spoiler" onmouseover="this.style.color='#FFF';" onmouseout="this.style.color=this.style.backgroundColor='#000'" style="background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"></span> lines. So actually, it does actually have a spoiler class, but Shii, being Shii, doesn't ever use it.