Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

It's time to Quit using Win98

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 4:53

I've held on to Win98 for years, and always loved it. I've added
everything possible such as Kernal-Ex, to keep it going, and struggled
to cope with incompatible software that requires newer versions of
Windows, particularly browsers.

The time has come to retire Win98, and allow Microsoft to win their
efforts to obsolete the older versions of Windows. But Microsoft really
is NOT going to win. In fact in my case, THEY LOSE. From the moment I
first put my hands on XP, I hated their so called NT based OSs. I
tried, really tried to adapt to XP, and always hated it no matter how
hard I forced myself to use it. By that time they had created their
worst failure, Vista, and were on their way to more bloated OSs, which I
would not touch if they gave me a free computer. Just seeing a Windows
8 computer on the shelves at a store makes me nauseous. All I see on
those screens are ugly boxes with links to commercial companies I would
not even go near, such as Netflix. They cant even offer decent looking
icons anymore.

Years ago, I knew thart the time would come when I could no longer use
Win98. It appears this time has come. Mainly due to the fact that there
is no longer a browser that is made for W98 that is compatible with most
present websites. I coped with occasional websites which would not
properly load in past years, but it now seems that 4 out of 5 sites are
no longer loading properly, using Firefox 3.6.x, and worse using other
browsers that work on W98. Of course I place blame on Mozilla for not
making their newer versions of Firefox compatible with W98.

The PC computer was originally supposed to be *THE* hardware for any OS,
but Microsoft took over and made the PC the Microsoft Computer. Their
only competitor is Linux, and there is really no competition involved,
since Linux has no actual support, and there are so many different
variations of Linux that only a computer geek can begin to use it, and
even then, it wont run popular software intended for Windows witout
adding yet more software.

The bottom line is this. Either kiss Microsoft's ass, or toss your PC
in the nearest garbage can. Well, I have given this considerable
thought, and decided that I will never give Microsoft another cent.
Particularly when I hate every OS they have made since Win98. I can
still continue to use WIN98 for my personal uses, but in order to go on
the internet, I have decided to spend some money and buy a Macintosh
computer. I never thought that I'd make that switch, and being elderly,
I really hate having to relearn to use a completely different computer
system, yet, there really is no other option.

I say this with much sadness, because I really liked Win98, and still
do. It's the only decent OS made by Microsoft, and they did their best
to destroy it. I guess 2014 will be the year when all of my past 25+
years of PC computer learning and use goes down the shitter, and I
switch to Macintosh. In some ways, I wish I had begun my computer
learning with the Mac, because I would not have to start all over now.
But that's life, particularly when Misrosoft greed is involved, and they
create one of the wealthiest monopolies on earth, while creating
absolute shit.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 5:07

nice kopipe but you forget that windows 2000 home edition does not use the nt kernel and the part that talks about GNU/Linux is made to cause flames

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 5:10

>>2
You talk like you are from /g/. Maybe you should go back there?

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.windows98/4CX8UHgtTsQ

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 5:16

>>3
Will you fuck off already? Stop trying to fit in with you ``/g/ detected lolol'' bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 5:33

>>3
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.windows98/4CX8UHgtTsQ
so I was right, it is a kopipe but why are you calling me a /g/ro? I made a very respectful post that tried to increase the quality of the board (``windows 2000 home edition does not use the nt kernel''), so are you calling me a /g/ because I called what you called as ``linux'' as ``GNU/Linux''? there are many people who do this for many reasons and most of them are not from /g/
I agree with >>4
-kun for the rest

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 5:38

>>4,5
Trolled hard you stupid shitskins. Maybe you shitskins should go learn youselfs a english and thne come back?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 5:40

>>6
xD

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 5:41

>>7
u mad lol

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 5:42

>>2
Are you sure this is kopipe?

>>1
I can relate. You should try puppy linux or linux mint or something. They run well on older hardware and are relatively user friendly. If you want to run a windows program, there's WINE, which has come a long way. A lot of things just work, but not everything.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 5:43

>>9
u have been le trolled xd
back to le gee

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 5:55

Peter and Sally were exploring the alien caverns when there was a sound from behind them. A green monster stood and while towering over them bellowed, "I am Legy!" Peter and Sally ran and Legy gave pursuit. After running through the dark tunnels, they found a hole to crawl through that Legy couldn't fit though. They left the angered Legy and continued running until they couldn't hear his screams of disappointment. Peter and Sally walked on. "There's no other exits," Peter said. "This tunnel goes straight and never ends," Sally responded, "When will we get out of here?" Suddenly a large spider the size of a Volkswagen Beetle descended from the ceiling. Large fangs extended and eagerly spat two clumps of venom. It's legs reached out and encroached upon the paralyzed Peter and Sally. Peter shouted, ``back to le gee''

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 6:03

>>11
You made my day

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 7:05

>>1
Welcome to The Club.

Posted from my iPhone.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 7:10

>>13
Which club is that, the Blue Oyster? Or the Steve Jobs Assbuggering and Mutual Blowjobs club?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 7:57

>>14
buggering
This is an United States of America Citizen's website only.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 8:11

>>15
Bugger my anus!

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 12:32

A sincere warning to the OP: Apple obsoletes their old operating systems at least twice as fast than Microsoft does. I don't feel like writing out all the details to you but you can look them up.

(I used to be an Apple user for several years.)

They changed architectures twice since 1994. Motorola 68k, then PowerPC, then x86. By contrast, Microsoft has stayed on x86 since the beginning.

Another example: the OS X version from 2001, 10.1, became obsolete (read: incompatible with latest browsers) years before XP (which also came out in 2001) did. In fact, XP is still compatible with latest browsers, at least the latest Firefox.
For example, the latest browser that Mac OS X 10.3, which came out in 2003, two years after XP, can run, was released in 2009. And the latest Firefox it can run is 2.0.20. That's right. It came out in 2003 and the latest Firefox version it can run is *less* than the latest Firefox version Win98 can run. (Source: http://lowendmac.com/osx/panther-10.3/)

There are countless other examples; as I said, you can research this if you like.

In a nutshell, Apple is all about planned obsolescence. This should be familiar to anyone who has dealt with e.g. iOS versions.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 13:33

became obsolete (read: incompatible with latest browsers)

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 13:43

>>18

Yes, that's one specific definition of obsolete which I find useful, since web browsing is a very popular computing task nowadays. But please feel free to make your own definitons of ``obsolete'' as well. I'm just trying to make the point that Apple is full of planned obsolescence.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 14:28

>>19
Take your chromebook and go back to wherever you people come from.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 14:58

>>20
Consider this: A pack of wild Googlers.
Savage, Glass-wearing Googlers nearing your noncloud home. Trampling your open source projects. Raping your privacy.
And you can't do shit since Google owns the internet. The Googler leader grabs your wife and fucks her with his chromebook.
The primal Googlers finally dominate your household. They watch barbaric shows on youtube and you are forced to provide data for Google analytics.
Such is the downfall of Private Man.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 15:15

>>20

I actually hate web apps and Chromebooks. But lots of stuff nowadays require web sites. For example my school's internal portal for reading mails from professors and submitting homeworks is web-based and full of javascript gunk.

And I also enjoy browsing websites. Reading newspapers or just about anything online also requires a fairly recent browser because of all the CSS and javascript bullshit.

A browser more than 2 or 3 years old misrenders everything on almost any site that wasn't designed with plain HTML simplicity in mind (which, sadly, means: most websites).

It's a PITA, it's awful, but it's the way it is. In a better world, the web would not have been such a monster.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 15:21

>>22

And to elaborate, I don't use a chromebook. (or apple's planned obsolescene stuff). I use a plain old local windowed desktop environment setup, which is what people used before the whole chromebook/gnome3/unity/metro/tablets/whatever bullshit started around 2010 or 2011.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 15:26

>>23
I use a plain old local windowed desktop environment setup
Whoa, that's somehow remarkable in the modern world? I wouldn't know the ways of windowed shit, I'm a tiler myself, but the fact that you mention it like that is somehow disturbing. Has everyone converted to inferior mobile shit and the corresponding inferior WMs?

Name: >>19 2014-05-11 15:34

>>24
No, but >>20-fu seemed to be implying I was a chromebook fanboy and I wanted to clarify.

Has everyone converted to inferior mobile shit and the corresponding inferior WMs?

I'm not sure but there's certainly been lots of marketing for it. Though I think most computer-minded types use the classical windowed (or tiling, as you mention) stuff.

Name: >>19 2014-05-11 15:38

>>25

speaking of which, I just read this amusingly disgusting blogspam:

The Windows desktop is now regarded by many people — even Microsoft themselves — as a relic that’s out-of-date in an age of simplified mobile interfaces and touch screens. But there was a time when the Windows desktop was the new, user-friendly interface.

http://www.howtogeek.com/188980/pcs-before-windows-what-using-ms-dos-was-actually-like/

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 16:30

It's funny how people complain just for the sake of complaining. >>1's solution is in their fourth paragraph.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 16:35

>>24
Why would you need a window manager when you can run everything fullscreen?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 17:30

>>28
BECAUSE I'LL FUCK YOUR ARSE

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 18:23

>>23
Why do you need to view more than one app at a time?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 18:29

>>30
They're called Program (plural: Programs) not ``app'' or ``apps''.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 18:33

>>31
It's way past your bedtime, grampa.

Sent from my iPad

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 18:40

>>32
I'm 17.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 18:46

>>31
Programs are a superset of applications. App and apps are abbreviations of application and application.

The type of program you will be running in your desktop environment is an application, so app is correct terminology.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 18:49

>>34
Only inferiors use ``app''. They are programs and shall be referred to as such. Same with ``coding'' or ``coder'' instead of programming and programmer.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 18:54

I'm starting to lose track of how many layers of trolling are occurring here.

Name: >>36 2014-05-11 19:13

Also, I'm just wondering: have you guys ever craved cock so badly that you found yourself running around outside, howling at the moon for it? Literally ROARING at the top of your lungs, wanting nothing less than a dick's head churning against your glottal stop?

Tell me I'm not alone.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 19:20

>>37
How inappropriate! There are 17 year-old coders in this thread.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 20:22

I'm sure /prog/ is mostly composed of teenagers and 30 something ENTERPRISE ``programmers''.

Now the real question is: Are there any FEMALES here?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-11 20:23

>>39
I'm in my early twenties.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List