>>22No.
Humans are as much of animals as the animals in a zoo are humans. Now actual thinking could be done of your proposition but I'm not going to make that obvious to you and it would be pointless to debate with an
idiot.
What about post-modernism? Just got done reading that wikipedia article about
that ``controversy''? Trying to fit in on the side you deem to be the winner of the presumed conflict of ``science'' and things that aren't ``science''? Your assumptions about me are amusing, your ignorance and misunderstanding of what intellect is and what requires it is also amusing.
I think you need to go visit a zoo and take a nice hard look at that chimp’s asshole.