Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

NSA's conflict of interest?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 0:46

If it is the NSA's job to Enforce National Security, shouldn't they leave the political / legislative stuff to the legislators / politicians..?

Isn't it a little dangerous to have the person enforcing the rules practically making the rules? (before long you have two sets of rules, isn't it?)

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 0:51

i wonder how much an intelligence agent would appreciate it if i camped outside his house? ^^

It's just a bit of harmless surveillance isn't it?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 0:53

Fuck off, you stupid aussie bastard.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 1:01

And maybe i'll wander over to his front yard and move things around... because that's similar to hopping onto a computer and simply shifting the files around..?

Not quite criminal yet? xD

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 1:05

what if i invade his house with thousands of tiny spy robots, but don't actually look at the sensor readings unless there is something suspicious..?

Not an invasion of privacy? =D

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 1:21

Everyone let Luke talk to himself. It's funnier if nobody talks to him.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 1:29

>>3 aww i'll don't bump then..

...But what is suspicious if i can't see what anything is? Isn't there already a basic level of intrusion necessary to even get started..?
Worse you might just discriminate against all unusual readings like some eugenics project =.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 1:37

Explain this?

In a secured room beneath the US Capitol last week, legislative aides working to finalize a bill intended to constrain the National Security Agency attempted to out-think a battery of lawyers working for the Obama administration and the intelligence services.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/19/nsa-surveillance-limits-usa-freedom-act

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 1:49

They are practically hiding from the nsa in the basement?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 1:58

>>9
no

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 2:18

>>10
Well yes, that is what they are doing you tard.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 2:34

>>11
no!

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 3:10

>>12
Idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 3:25

>>13
you

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 3:28

pretty scummy tactic isn't it, they are trying to formulate an argument against surveillance, but their arguments are probably known and countered beforehand, due to surveillance?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 3:40

all legislation potentially could have a surveillance bias?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 3:53

non-surveillance related legislation being biased by surv. would be pretty much invisible too
fortunately surveillance related legislation being biased by surveillance isn't xD

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 3:56

No wonder Fisa is so quiet =)

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 6:17

It's kind of funny how america is trying to wipe it's hands of snowden..
I guess he's a bit like the one iraqi who isn't a terrorist xD

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 6:37

you want to take that one example and extrapolate, if only the other iraqi's were more accepting..
Instead you have Al Queda Tonight preaching the koran on this infidel extremist ^^

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 6:48

i dunno, there must be some compromise..
if i wear a blanket while surfing the internet can i have secure internet?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 22:40

>>21
A cold internet isn't an internet I want to live in. It must be a warm and fuzzy internet.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 0:22

Can data really even be illegal..?
And if not, how to justify searching every last data packet for something that cannot technically even exist?
You may as well be searching cutlery draws for ray guns

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 0:25

Luke's views on internet privacy are still more articulated than most Americans'. Suck my dick, burgergobblers.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 0:38

And why is information that is for sale protected by law?
I can't collect the information from a windows 7 disc and go and sell it on the corner... or slap nsa with a strike for piracy of private data...

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 0:47

>>24
american
>burger
I think you should go back to 4chan, meme-master.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 0:52

I love you Luke.

Name: Not >>24 2014-05-24 1:07

>>24,26
Shut the fucking hell up already. Nobody gives a shit about your redirections, cumguzzler.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 3:23

I'm going to invent a technologically advanced security blanket ^^
All programming is to be physically printed onto the fabric =)

Do you think it would be easy to print programmatic logic?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 6:39

>>29
Flexible circuits interwoven with cozy fabric. cozy computing

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 6:58

>>30
Oh look, another 4chan maymay.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 8:26

>>31
You're going to have to explain this one to me. I'm at a loss. I was going off of cloud computing. But in anycase your `expertise' of ``4 chan maymay'' is showing. Maybe you should go back there >>32 fuck off with your board redirections fag shit. >>32 no fuck you muther fucker >>32 I'll teach you to suck eggs! *Biff*! *Bop*! *Shuffle*! *Scurry*! *Raw insertion of unlubricated penis*! **calmly settling down and falling asleep with >>32's dick in butt**

Name: Anonymous 2016-07-19 21:21

check em

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List