Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

lmao at languages where you can't reason by induction

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 16:10

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 16:30

lmao if you think I'm a twit

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-23 18:11

faggots

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 1:55

Induction is for retards who have too many dicks in their ass to think clearly and work out a direct proof.

Wait, he's talking about inductive reasoning, not about mathematical induction. Why is that a bad thing? Are you intentionally trying to make sloppy programs who draw erroneous conclusions about your program's universe?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 2:03

First off, who the fuck is this faggot and why are you wasting my time on him?

Secondly, he is right; endotensors were found using a deductive proof, ergo, deduction is the superior method.

>>4
The brain is basically a very powerful regression engine, but in computer science, students need to think like computers, which are built with pure deductive logic. Students should learn in a language that forbids mere learning with patterns.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 2:08

>>5
The brain isn't like anything or ``basically a very powerful'' anything. Screw off you pseudo-intellectual. And where's that paper about endotensors? Look at this shit http://www.google.com/search?q=endotensor&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 2:14

>>6

Brain is a set of neurons, together with a function, mapping pair of neurons to the weight of connection between them.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 2:18

>>7
Fuck off you stupid russian.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 2:32

What do you think the results would be of teaching someone to program with agda as their first language?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 2:48

The brain can be modeled as a matrix of endotensors closed under electrochemical addition and multiplication, that accepts a set of eigenfunctors from the nervous system and senses to perform full duplex Bayesian reduction, giving rise to higher order thought. It does this in O(n*ln(n)).

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 2:53

>>10
Fuck off with your ``just so'' stories and post-modernism, pseudo-intellectual, minskyian retard.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 2:58

Lesswrong.com is more like Completelywrong.com.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 11:13

>>10-11
/bbs/'s two biggest faggots. I hope you slap each other's balls to death.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 12:19

>>11
Like I care what an ultrafinitist retard like you has to say.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 13:57

I'm farting so much

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-24 18:52

>>10
Yet all competing implementations of that same model have greater time complexity.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List