Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Which of you submitted this?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 1:42

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7802730

Hacker news is gay
1 point by of 4 minutes ago | discuss

Hacker news has always been gay. That's obvious to everyone (I hope).

What I'm wondering is will this site ever be cool. I keep coming back here because I'm too lazy to type in my password to the Something Awful forums. Just wondering if anyone actually likes this site?

thx in advance for your replies.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 1:53

[dead]

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 3:50

>>1: TROOF

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 6:26

what's wrong with being gay? srsly, why i have to follow cattle-induced stereotypes that tells me what to do with my pepe.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 8:50

hi guys

if you could just keep your blog sites to yourselves thanks!

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 16:41

>>5
but we want to see too

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 16:42

>>4
Because you're an illiterate, ignorant piece of trash.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 16:48

knacker hughes

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 16:50

>>4
Because you must provide offspring. It's the way healthy, viable societies proliferate: they force men to have and raise children, not march about on gay parades all day.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 17:02

>>9
But the world is already overpopulated, so being a cum-guzzling faglord is a good thing.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 17:03

can someone repost it?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 17:53

>>10
It's not, because if your part of the world gets underpopulated, then it's going to be overrun by immigrants from parts of the world which are overpopulated.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 17:55

>>4
I'm pretty sure >>1 isn't referring to homosexuality; instead, he is calling the users of hackerjews faggots (i.e. oversensitive, disagreeable, corner-rounding individuals).

Nothing wrong with being homosexual. We don't like faggots though.

>>10
I think >>9 was being facetious. Unless you are both the same person.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 17:58

>>12
Close off your borders and only let in the really smart or strong ones.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 18:52

>>12

Maybe because these immigrants are more efficient evolutionary? Think of Zerg rush.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 19:30

>>9
but what about my perfect anime girlfriends?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 19:43

Genes are just genes and have no relation to animal psychology or human psychology and society (which is non-animal in the stereotypical sense people use of the word ``animal'') therefore no technical biological terms apply to humans. And every truly superior human is an individualist and society cant force me to do shit or I'll fight back and be remembered while current society will be forgotten. Powerful Humans can simply will themselves not to live as they have power and control over both life and death, nature is nothing more than a pretty thing to look at though in africa you shall see its true being which is death and suffering. That's why humans must be above and not related to nature beyond the most superficial relations as nature is a sadistic and masochistic eternal hell with no clear goal or purpose and clearly highly inferior. I use ``nature'' in the sense of it as being a biological and earth thing. Not as universe or reality.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-27 21:19

>>17

Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-29 15:44

>>12
The world as a whole is still overpopulated though, and that's still a problem. If a lifeboat is in danger of sinking because it has too many people on it, would you think it reasonable to put a cow on it "because the problem is that it has too many people, not too many cows"?

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 13:30

>>19
That's a problem humans cannot solve because they're ultimately animals. Only the planet can solve its overpopulation problem (via epidemics, cataclisms, ice ages, droughts etc).

That's why it's stupid to send aid money to Africa to help "poor starving children". The more food Africans have, the more children they will breed, and more of them will be starving. In fact, they will always be starving no matter how much food they have. It's just natural.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 13:45

Humans must solve their problems, or the planet will destroy them. And obviously sending food won't help with overpopulation, what may help however is giving them better access to birth control, and in the long term helping them transition to an industrial or post-industrial economy.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 14:12

>>21
The planet probably won't destroy us all. Humans are tenacious and adaptable. But what they can't do is control their desire to procreate. Thus there will be death and decrease in population. Probably with wars, too. There's just not enough resources for 7 billion people to consume as many goods as an average American.

what may help however is giving them better access to birth control, and in the long term helping them transition to an industrial or post-industrial economy.
They've been getting help for decades, with little impact.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 16:57

>>19
Keine is a cow.

Thanks for listening.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-30 20:18

places that are in my personal blacklist because of their utterly stupid comments:
- Lambda the Ultimate
- le /r/haskell
- The n-Category Cafe
- comp.lang.lisp
- /pedo/rider

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-01 2:04

>>24
Why are you on pedorider then?

Name: delete meta 2016-10-01 4:49

>>24
List the places that have good comments

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List