Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

QWERTY MASTER RACE

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-01 18:08

Ergonomic studies also confirm that the advantages of Dvorak are either small or nonexistent. For example, A. Miller and J Thomas, two researchers at the IBM Research Laboratory, writing in the International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, conclude that "no alternative has shown a realistically significant advantage over the QWERTY for general purpose typing." Other studies based on analysis of hand-and-finger motions find differences of only a few percentage points between Dvorak and QWERTY. The consistent finding in ergonomic studies is that the results imply no clear advantage for Dvorak, and certainly no advantage of the magnitude that is so often claimed.

http://lifehacker.com/should-i-use-an-alternative-keyboard-layout-like-dvorak-1447772004

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-01 18:14

define "advantage"
also that mac keyboard featured in article makes whole aplle design department eliglible for public stoning.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-01 20:52

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-02 0:26

>>3
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█ ___ █
█ // 7 █
█ (_,_/\ WORSHIP THIS █
█ \ \ YOUR THROBBING GOD █
█ \ \ █
█ _\ \__ █
█ ( \ ) █
█ \___\___/ █
█ █
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-02 4:45

typing this on a dvorak layout i win

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-02 4:50

typing this on a colemak layout in 0.5 seconds

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-02 19:16

typing this on a qwerty layout in 0.25 seconds

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-02 19:20

typing this on a abcdef layout in 1 nano second

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-02 19:40

xvlcwk layout here, i am writing on my own

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-02 20:52

I ARE ANDRU
ANDRU NOT KEYBOARD
I ARE TYPE FAST
I ARE NOT MANY ERROR

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-03 1:04

'
>Not using QGMLWY layout
Stay beta >>1

mkweb.bcgsc.ca/carpalx/?full_optimization

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-03 1:09

>>11
'>Not using QGMLWY layout
HOLY SHIT EPIC MEMES /B/RO! XDDDd

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-03 1:57

>>11
I don't understand. Why did you misuse the code block like that? Is this a new programming language you've developed?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-03 12:11

>>12
Whom are you quoting? >>11-sama did not have the ``''' at the same line

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List