Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

joke of the day

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-07 6:37

gcc following standards

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-08 15:20

exception caught: unreplied thread with index > 18

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-08 15:53

>>1
that's closer to a holocaust-denying tract than a joke

how does godwin's law work on /prog/ anyway?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-08 15:58

gcc is a leader, not a follower.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-08 16:02

follow my anus

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-08 16:30

GCC sucks ass. It is intentionally disorganized, has poorly planned and useless extensions, and the developers are unresponsive, at best.

Name: mission-critical-apps 2014-06-08 17:24

mission-critical-apps

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-09 12:27

gcc rather be a dick than a swallower.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-09 13:32

making the hippo dance

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-09 13:46

>>6
at least it's not llvm

Name: Alexander Dubček 2014-06-09 15:25

#include <u.h>
#include <libc.h>

void
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int x;

if(argc != 2){
fprint(2, "usage: check <postid>\n");
exits("missing argument");
}

x = atoi(argv[1]);
if(x % 11)
exits("not doubles");
else
print("Check my doubles!\n");
exits("");
}


VALID PLAN9 C

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-09 15:29

>>11
Too bad the program itself is invalid. 121 ain't no dubs, Mister Dubček.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-09 15:43

>>11
if(x % 11)
should be:
if ((x%100)%11)

Name: Alexander Dubček 2014-06-09 15:44

>>12

Thanks for the bug report.

% diff -c olddubs.c dubs.c
olddubs.c:11,18 - dubs.c:11,20
exits("missing argument");
}

- x = atoi(argv[1]);
- if(x % 11)
+ x = strlen(argv[1]);
+ if(x < 2)
+ exits("unit");
+ if(argv[1][--x] != argv[1][--x])
exits("not doubles");
else
print("Check my doubles!\n");

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-09 16:07

>>14
INVOKES UNDEFINED BEHAVIOUR!

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-09 19:57

>>15
undefine my anus

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-09 23:31

>>16
anus = Nothing is the best I can do, as Haskell has no state!!!

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-10 8:10

>>1
AHHAHA

HEREZ A FUNNIER JOKE:
standards

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-10 8:20

check 'em

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-10 18:03

>>19
F-A-I-L
You fail, sir. The only thing I checked was your fail.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-11 12:05

>>11
Plan 9 C is the only C people should be using.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-11 12:24

>>20

That's how u do the reel thing

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-05 18:19

>>1
GCC has pretty decent support for DA STANDARD(S), it just also supports GNU extensions by default. It's still probably the best C compiler for strictly-confirming code on the PC platform, as the latest C standard fully supported by the Microsoft compiler is over 25 years old. Clang/LLVM has decent standards support, but it's a bit young and underdeveloped compared to the GNU and Microsoft compilers. Other compilers are either not available for free, or are severely underdeveloped even compared to Clang.

Name: Anonymous 2017-01-07 13:02

Check em

Name: Literally Most Massive Penis 2017-01-08 11:26

Literally Most Massive Penis Erection

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List