>>8 Waaaa~ what makes you think I hate him? I sympathize with him. If I had to host a bunch of morons with no connection to w4c/prog/ that were more interested in posting links to reddit, talking about /g/, and arguing over gender shit, while in a position where none of the people who the board was made for want to see anything removed, then I might do something drastic and evil.
Admin-like is a great man of even greater restraint.
Name:
Anonymous2014-06-08 0:37
If I was admin of /g/, I would issue permanent bans to ricers with an explanation that they should kill themselves.
>>10 I'm glad to see that least someone understands. I practice restraint by not caring, for the most part. Sometimes I get the urge to ban everyone and replace the site with rotating progsnakes, but it eventually subsides.
>>12 Please stop this. How many times do I have to say that I'm not taking post/thread removal requests? Stop calling out "Admin, do this!". I know it's a novelty to have an administrator/moderator that actually remembers their site exists, but don't make posts directed at me. If there's a bug or serious issue, or you have feature suggestions, relay it to me on the IRC (or a thread on lounge, maybe), otherwise, pretend I don't exist.
>>13,14 Then just ignore him. It's fun having someone calling you out all the time. He's just a retard :). If we're going for a 4chan clone of /prog/, that's how it should've been. Moot would've never replied to >>12.
We require that people join because many of those who join like the service and end up contributing back to Quora, which makes it better for everyone. People spend a ton of time making Quora great by sharing their knowledge on here, so we think it is reasonable to ask that others who want to get to all the free knowledge here take the first very small step toward contributing back which is creating an account. That is the only reason we have the policy: to get more people to join who will share more knowledge and make Quora even better for everyone in the long run.
Wrong explanations cannot read like a LAC rant, BECAUSE ALL LAC RANTS BY THEIR DEFINITION CONTAIN CORRECT EXPLANASHUNS. YA AIN'T READ DA POSTS HAVE YA, YA STACKBOI?
>>28 Lambda Arthur Calculus, or L.A. Calculus, rants about C code that is written by people ignorant of the C standard, referred to by him as "DA STANDARD." His rants are distinguishable by all caps and what is either gangster or Warcraft orc pidgin English. By the way, if anyone knows which, I'd be much obliged if they told me.
Name:
Anonymous2014-06-11 3:08
>>33 I've always read his posts like a sports announcer with a Brooklyn accent