I don't have any, because all games are the same in the essence, even random games (because randomness doesn't exist). You have a game world as input, your search it and do a move. So all games involve an element of exploration.
Name:
Anonymous2014-06-13 10:58
Morrowind and Skyrim.
Name:
What is Your Favorite Chick?2014-06-13 10:59
I don't have any, because all chicks are the same in the essence, even non-whores (because non-whore chicks don't exist). You have a dick as input, you insert it and do a move. So all chicks involve an element of friction.
Name:
What is Your Favorite Food?2014-06-13 11:12
I don't have any, because all foods are the same in the essence, even restaurant foods (because restaurants doesn't exist). You have a foodstuff as input, you put it inside your mouth and do a chew. So all foods involve an element of mastication.
Name:
Anonymous2014-06-13 11:42
so you're saying all 2hus are the same then
Name:
Anonymous2014-06-13 11:46
Counter Strike
Name:
What is Your Favorite Touhou?2014-06-13 11:46
I don't have any, because all touhous are the same in the essence, even kawaii touhous (because kawaiiness doesn't exist). You have a Japanese cartoon as input, you watch it and become an autist. So all touhous involve an element of autism.
Pretty sure randomness exists or the concept itself wouldn't exist in the first place and the NSA would have found all the patterns in everything. It may not completely exist in computers but it will in quantum ones and that's a reason why they are so valuable.
Determinism is easy to comprehend and that's why it is popular among retards. These are the kind of people who will never understand the math and physics of the future.
Wait, isn't the pseudointellectual shotgun guy anti-modern-science and thus anti-quantum-stuff because it's jewish pseudoscience? I'm confused.
Name:
Anonymous2014-06-13 17:28
>>15 Universe is a Deterministic Finite State Automation, implying that you have to know the current state to determine the future (by definition of DFSA).
Universe is a Deterministic Finite State Automation
Where's the proof, faggot?
you have to know the current state to determine the future
Knowing the full current state would contradict the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Besides, it still wouldn't allow the determination of the future, because the laws of nature are probabilistic.
Name:
Anonymous2014-06-13 17:46
Knowing the full state ot the Universe would also require an infinite speed of information which would contradict the Relativity Theory.
That principle doesn't apply to sampling the complete state from outside of the universe. It applies only to sampling the parts of it. Basically it states the whole is more than the sum of it's parts.
The universe is neither digital nor computable. Fuck off with your pseudo-sciences and scams. kurz is a fool and that ``my big toe'' guy is a joke and scam artist.
>>18 Universe is neither deterministic nor a fsa you stupid retard. Plus there is different meanings to ``deterministic'' and determnsitc you rae using is of a computer science concept and not what physicists or philosophers and so on mean and the universe is of no version.
A finite-state machine (FSM) or finite-state automaton (plural: automata), or simply a state machine, is a mathematical model of computation used to design both computer programs and sequential logic circuits
Go back to your shitty pseudo-intellectual lesswrong.com site and deal with the fact that you're too dumb to do anything proper. Heuristics are such a simple thing and don't mean much.
Can we all agree to just stop responding to >>23 until he stops having temper tantrums all the time? He had his lucid moments on w4c and some time out would do him good.
>>30 Because they're essential to the interpretation. You can include non-diverging if you like, but it doesn't help anything. I'm not sure what's going on with this infinity:infinity nonsense, but many worlds already presumes an uncountably infinite set of universes.
It's not about measuring other worlds, and sorry, you can't. If you believe it you'll have to do so on faith with the comfort that it is consistent with a deterministic universe. I think it's silly, especially because belief in it discourages further thought on the subject. Why believe in something that has no other effect than to stifle curiosity?
>>35 Hugh Everett. Why do you think it was postulated in the first place?
Name:
Anonymous2014-06-14 4:12
-morrowind -baldur's gate -a few gta's -the exile series -shadowrun (SNES) -Command and Conqeur Tiberian Sun -SC, SC2 -Mario Bros. 2 & 3 Most likely my favourite game is The Legend of Zelda II: The Adventure of Link, for NES. I don't know why, it's near impossible unless you've already tried and failed many times. It's beautiful and doesn't baby you. It also has a charm of primitive limitation.
Name:
Anonymous2014-06-14 4:37
>>21 Um, yes, you need infinite speed. Otherwise you'll be seeing stars that are long gone.