Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

What is Your Favourite Video Game?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 10:57

I don't have any, because all games are the same in the essence, even random games (because randomness doesn't exist). You have a game world as input, your search it and do a move. So all games involve an element of exploration.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 10:58

Morrowind and Skyrim.

Name: What is Your Favorite Chick? 2014-06-13 10:59

I don't have any, because all chicks are the same in the essence, even non-whores (because non-whore chicks don't exist). You have a dick as input, you insert it and do a move. So all chicks involve an element of friction.

Name: What is Your Favorite Food? 2014-06-13 11:12

I don't have any, because all foods are the same in the essence, even restaurant foods (because restaurants doesn't exist). You have a foodstuff as input, you put it inside your mouth and do a chew. So all foods involve an element of mastication.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 11:42

so you're saying all 2hus are the same then

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 11:46

Counter Strike

Name: What is Your Favorite Touhou? 2014-06-13 11:46

I don't have any, because all touhous are the same in the essence, even kawaii touhous (because kawaiiness doesn't exist). You have a Japanese cartoon as input, you watch it and become an autist. So all touhous involve an element of autism.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 12:53

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 14:05

Pretty sure randomness exists or the concept itself wouldn't exist in the first place and the NSA would have found all the patterns in everything. It may not completely exist in computers but it will in quantum ones and that's a reason why they are so valuable.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 14:07

angry pseudo-intellectual atheist virgins

How does It feel to not have my unmeasurable IQ and wife?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 14:12

>>9
Universe is finite and deterministic. Deal with it, kike.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 14:13

>>11
Universe is infinite and non-deterministic. Your simplistic model fails in reality.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 14:14

Determinism is easy to comprehend and that's why it is popular among retards. These are the kind of people who will never understand the math and physics of the future.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 14:20

Grothendieck and the Grays agree with me. Who agrees with you? mentally ill pseudo-intellectuals who are all fluff and no substance.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 15:22

>>11
Why don't you determine the future then, faggot?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 15:24

>>9
Randomness exists in computers with a suitable random generator, of which there are a ton.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 16:02

Wait, isn't the pseudointellectual shotgun guy anti-modern-science and thus anti-quantum-stuff because it's jewish pseudoscience? I'm confused.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 17:28

>>15
Universe is a Deterministic Finite State Automation, implying that you have to know the current state to determine the future (by definition of DFSA).

>>16
suitable
random generator
/0

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 17:34

>>18
Universe is a Deterministic Finite State Automation
Where's the proof, faggot?

you have to know the current state to determine the future
Knowing the full current state would contradict the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Besides, it still wouldn't allow the determination of the future, because the laws of nature are probabilistic.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 17:46

Knowing the full state ot the Universe would also require an infinite speed of information which would contradict the Relativity Theory.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 18:52

>>20

you don't need infinite speed to transfer a finite state.

>>19
Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
That principle doesn't apply to sampling the complete state from outside of the universe. It applies only to sampling the parts of it. Basically it states the whole is more than the sum of it's parts.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 18:53

>>19

Where's the proof, faggot?
Ever seen "infinity"?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 19:45

The universe is neither digital nor computable. Fuck off with your pseudo-sciences and scams. kurz is a fool and that ``my big toe'' guy is a joke and scam artist.

>>18
Universe is neither deterministic nor a fsa you stupid retard. Plus there is different meanings to ``deterministic'' and determnsitc you rae using is of a computer science concept and not what physicists or philosophers and so on mean and the universe is of no version.

A finite-state machine (FSM) or finite-state automaton (plural: automata), or simply a state machine, is a mathematical model of computation used to design both computer programs and sequential logic circuits

Go back to your shitty pseudo-intellectual lesswrong.com site and deal with the fact that you're too dumb to do anything proper. Heuristics are such a simple thing and don't mean much.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 19:48

>>17
fuckin newfag

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 20:06

>>23
eat dick

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 21:15

Can we all agree to just stop responding to >>23 until he stops having temper tantrums all the time? He had his lucid moments on w4c and some time out would do him good.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 21:21

Team Fortress Classic

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-13 21:46

>>11
It's impossible to prove that the universe is finite AFAIK.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 1:05

>>28
conservation of infinity

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 1:48

Why does many worlds only look at diverging events?
if you have a 1:infinity relationship, don't you also get an infinity:1 relation ?

infinity:infinity conservation ^^
Now show that you can measure other universes with quantummy stuff and i might believe you =D

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 2:00

I don't think you guys know what you are talking about.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 2:01

>>30
Because they're essential to the interpretation. You can include non-diverging if you like, but it doesn't help anything. I'm not sure what's going on with this infinity:infinity nonsense, but many worlds already presumes an uncountably infinite set of universes.

It's not about measuring other worlds, and sorry, you can't. If you believe it you'll have to do so on faith with the comfort that it is consistent with a deterministic universe. I think it's silly, especially because belief in it discourages further thought on the subject. Why believe in something that has no other effect than to stifle curiosity?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 2:01

video games lol

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 2:15

>>32
specially because belief in it discourages further thought on the subject. Why believe in something that has no other effect than to stifle curiosity?

Sounds like determinism.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 2:17

>>32
you can't.
I like how you think you know what you're talking about. Says who?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 3:11

>>28

It's impossible to prove that the universe is infinite AFAIK.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 3:24

>>36
stupid russian

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 4:11

>>35
Hugh Everett. Why do you think it was postulated in the first place?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 4:12

-morrowind
-baldur's gate
-a few gta's
-the exile series
-shadowrun (SNES)
-Command and Conqeur Tiberian Sun
-SC, SC2
-Mario Bros. 2 & 3
Most likely my favourite game is The Legend of Zelda II: The Adventure of Link, for NES. I don't know why, it's near impossible unless you've already tried and failed many times. It's beautiful and doesn't baby you. It also has a charm of primitive limitation.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 4:37

>>21
Um, yes, you need infinite speed. Otherwise you'll be seeing stars that are long gone.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 5:06

>>40

You can't see something that is gone.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 6:35

>>41
Try looking up at the sky at night.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 7:13

>>42

I see photons. What else?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 7:14

>>32
many worlds already presumes an uncountably infinite set of universes.

I don't like the term uncountable infinity... but anyway, what you mean is an infi-nentially expanding infinity... =)

If you allow infinite:1 convergence, then you get a kind of stable infinity =D and the possibility of measuring another universe ^^

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 7:28

If universes can just pop into existence, why the big bang?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 7:36

more interesting maybe, if you don't allow convergence, you end up with infinities of universes that are exactly the same?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 7:42

perhaps the multiverse doesn't really care if one quantum particle spins left or right..? Does it really make a difference?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 8:07

..Or would the convergence of nearest-universes prevent even a singular infinity of universes? ie it all collapses to a single universe...

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 8:18

Universes are so clumsy... surely it's a locally-based phenomenon ^^
Maybe only if a significant difference continued to propagate right out into the universe, would it be much more than a non-event?
...like splitting a star in half?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 8:24

a tree falls in the woods and no-one hears it...
Precisely what time did it fall over? =)

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 9:17

>>50
But Australia has no woods, Luke.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 10:15

>>51
And America no Anonymous, Anonymous.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 10:30

ps.
america is now worried about terrorists from other dimensions...
xD

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 10:45

It's funny, the only thing america doesn't worry about is it's big iron beak... that thing really has been everywhere, man!

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 11:35

>>54
Even *gasp* your anus?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 17:10

>>44
and the possibility of measuring another universe ^^

It's forbidden by the interpretation.

If you want sugoooooooooi shit, go read a book or watch some animo or watch pop "science" crap on television.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 21:38

>>56
Come up with another interpretation then. I'm sure a genius could go and do just that with ease. Too bad we don't seem to have those anymore. Now it's just a bunch of specialized faggots and their giant circular labs.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 22:34

NetHack. I love being killed over and over in creative ways.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 22:40

Isn't the collapse of the wave function proof enough of convergence?

If everything just diverged, there would be nothing to measure?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 22:47

Or quantum particles are just a bit unstable and people are reading into it waay too much? =)

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 22:49

>>59
measure my anus

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 22:57

Does the standard model even explain why atomic particles can break down in different ways?
it's a bit like an omelet can be made from either eggs or apples... =D

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 23:03

and if you want to separate the yolk from the white, just throw it at the wall as hard as you can ^^

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 23:20

Has anyone even assembled an electron(/etc) out of quarks yet?

What if quarks are made by smashing atoms together, rather than atoms being made of quarks?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 23:30

Logically, photons would be the ideal building blocks for all other particles, since you can't speed them up to 0.99c and smash them...

I guess you could try slowing them down though, somehow =)

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 23:34

What about a Trio of `Luke Particles' ^^ which bind with photons to produce protons, neutrons, and electrons?
xD

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 23:41

c Kinetic -> mass...
You might expect things to get a bit odd at 0.99c too..

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 23:46

e = mc^2 ..

but why only electrons absorb photons?
are there other sorts of photon..?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-14 23:58

>>64
back to /g/, shitstorm

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-15 0:10

light (or magnetism?!), maybe gravity, and ...?

magnetic fields are patterns in photons emitted due to the sync of the motion of electrons by the magnetic material affecting the electrons in the secondary material ^^

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-15 0:38

magnetic light =)
radio is somehow different to magnetism though...
i guess with one you send a charge down a wire and it builds a stable pulse that travels a long way..
so magnetism must be all near-field cross-wave patterns?

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-15 9:10

super mario world

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-15 20:08

1
The one where you have to move your cursor to different positions and press the button.

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-15 20:57

                   
                                            
                                     
                      
                                
 

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-16 0:51

super smash bros melee

Name: Anonymous 2014-06-16 14:06

shitopposting in /frog/

Name: Anonymous 2016-07-19 21:21

check em

Name: Anonymous 2016-07-23 17:02

quantum randomness is deterministic
Adventures of Lolo III for NES.

Name: Anonymous 2016-07-23 17:04

>>78
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2016-07-23 20:28

>>79
Various Artists(Former scientists).

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List