>>20The word `reference' does not appear in that mother fucking article. Now just who the fuck were you quoting because you've given me two different possible sources now and both of them were fucking inaccurate. You wouldn't last one second as a professional journalist. You would be fired for this incident already. Pathetic.
>>19One cannot quote the future unless they have achieved time travel and if they had then that would be the important news story, not some bullshit about some language for faggots created by a corporation that acts as a parasite leaching off of society via techno consumerism.