computer science has nothing to do with the real world it can never discover new truths about this world only philosophy can discover new truths about this world
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-18 16:34
Make philosophying AI
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-18 18:03
Computer Science is applied Logic. Logic is philosophy. Computer Science is Philosophy.
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-18 18:12
Computer science is not a science. Not either is philosophy, but usually it doesn't caims to be. Logic is only a tool for humans to understand reality. Logic for logic's sake is only useless abstract bullshit. Philosophy and CS are abstract bullshit.
Just want to end this thread right here before you pseudo-intellectuals start saying even more shit and start angering me even more. You want something to be retarded about?
Well here, there are no such thing as races and if there were then Jews have shown themselves to be the truly and only ``master race''. If you want to believe their ``jew'' genes make them have superior IQs to the rest of the races then fine.
Don't make me laugh. When has philosophy ever discovered anything about this world? Philosophy is just word-masturbation. Computer programs at least achieve something besides stroking someone's ego.
>>11 Philosophy is a product of logic. Without sequences there can't be any questions or answers. Logic drives philosophy as much as science or anything else.
implicit, indirect, hinted, suggested, insinuated, deducible, inferred, understood; oblique, unspoken, unexpressed, undeclared, unstated, unsaid, tacit, unacknowledged, not spelt out, silent, taken for granted, taken as read, assumed; insinuate, suggest, hint, intimate, implicate, say indirectly, indicate, give someone to understand, give someone to believe, convey the impression, signal; involve, entail; mean, point to, signify, indicate, signal; necessitate, require;
G.C.'s use monoxide, which is like euthanasia (and inherently bad because Nazi's..)
Where-as Missiles use explosives over crazy-long distance, ie being ripped to shreds by someone on the horizon (and everyone's favorite weapon, no mention of nazi's here... *cough v2 cough* )
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-20 11:14
If you can't put someone to sleep if you catch them, how come you can blow them to pieces if you can't..?
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-20 11:32
If you catch someone with a device... aren't they still a prisoner? And if your device just moves very fast, and then optionally explodes, who's the criminal here?
>>30 I can confirm that I am above a thread like this and am reading but not submitting postings.
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-21 14:38
>>32 Women exist, but they're not men. Is that too hard for your feministic pea-brain to comprehend?
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-21 16:13
While we're on the subject of phylosophy: if you've ever wonder what metamonads are and how they're related to Leibniz's monads:
Cellulose is a rich energy source (as demonstrated by the amount of energy released when wood is burned), but remains difficult to digest. Termites rely primarily upon symbiotic protozoa (metamonads)
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-21 16:14
The metamonads are a large group of flagellate amitochondriate protozoa. Their composition is not entirely settled, but they include the retortamonads, diplomonads, and possibly the parabasalids and oxymonads as well.
Fuck, now I know more Haskell than Edward Kmett.
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-21 17:57
Monadic endotensors are more powerful than metamonads.
>>38 But oxymonadic retortotensors are more zygotonistic than monadic endotensors provided there exists a weak alpha-coangular (3,4)-preprotomorphism in your gonads.
>>4 Logic and philosophy are a form of science, however they are not a natural science where people apply the scientific method to falsify philosophical ideas for philosophy is not falsifiable as the natural sciences. Science is simply a form of knowledge especially that knowledge which is studied within a system.