Infinite Compression: G-d can't even do it

Looks like some scientists are finally realizing the nonsense of continuum mechanics and infinitisemals. Black holes don't exist, at least not in the traditional understanding of black holes. It turns out that they have finite density after all, and gravitational collapse stops right on the surface of the event horizon. There is no infinitely dense singularity.

http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-1.14583?wafflebotCursorId=1390759808110993:0:0

So much for the set of real numbers. YHWH sure doesn't need them.

Hawking has been wrong before, i.e. his claim that there is no afterlife. Science has proven and documented reincarnation, i.e. Dr. Ian Stevenson and Dr. Jim B. Tucker at Univ. of Virginia, Dr. Brian Weiss, book 'Soul Survivor', Carol Bowman, 'Reincarnation Theory & its 23 Principles/Theory of Luck (ex. Einstein returned as Watson)', etc. . This universe was created by the Big Bang (a supermassive white-hole) 13.82 billion-years ago which was the direct result of a supermassive black-hole in another universe within The Conglomerate of Nonparallel-Universes (multiverse). This 'simple' cause-and-effect hypothesis using the duality of these two singularities is accepted by the majority of astrophysicists; it neatly explains infinite space and infinite time/eternity. This universe and that SBH share the same boundary. Now whether that boundary is correctly described as an 'event horizon' or as Hawking recommends an 'apparent horizon' is the question! Since there is an energy and information transfer in the process of SBH Big Banging into a new universe, possibly 'apparent horizon' is the best term. However, event horizon redefined as permitting energy and information to (eventually) escape from it would also work dictionary-wise.

math.andrej.com/2008/11/21/a-haskell-monad-for-infinite-search-in-finite-time

>>2

Shalom, Hymie! Sorry, but you won't inherit Heaven for killing Goyim and there is no God. You will die, like the rest of animals.

>>44
What about Peace and what about Hymens, Nikita? What about Inheritance and Heaven and Goyim and God, Nikita? What about Death and Animals, Nikita? This isn't a Petting Zoo, Nikita. This is Science and not your Depressive Inferior Emotional Brain and its Defective Soul-Link. Maybe next time you'll get a Better one ;).

>>5

You are not God's Chosen, because there are no "God", so the term "God's Chosen" has no sense. I'm sorry for you, Hymie. Your pandiabolism will lead your nowhere.

>>6
I am Sorry For Your Lots, Nikita. HaShem does play dice and you may become Chosen in the next Life, Nikita. Probably not though, ;).

>>2
It's not just Hawking, but the entire digital physics crowd. Leonard Susskind proposed this over 15 years ago, and finally Hawking is starting to admit Susskind is right.

>>8
Digital physics is wrong and incorrect.

>>3
what happens if the item to be found is at the end of the list?

>>6
Or we are all god's chosen, and really, why not?
If god chooses not, then not it is
We are, so how could we be not?
Emoticons withheld

>>1

So much for the set of real numbers. YHWH sure doesn't need them.

must be nice to run out of numbers when doing calculations with big numbers, idiot

And that doesn't mean god's to blame for israels shitty choices either =D

shit, at least the ruskies stopped at one missile

>>1
Well, isn't god a Finite being anyway?
Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ..?

Infinities don't have ends?

Damn, take a literacy class or three =)

If Israeli's really were smart, they wouldn't be going all Nazi over a skinny patch of desert, would they?

And what the hell is obama doing supporting these guys...
ffs obama, c'mon now.. you can't frown at one missile, then give another hundred the thumbs up

Defending yourself while invading/occupying another country? Really?

Omg Words.. Much Criminal ^^

Where's your Tranquilizer Bullets Nazi-san?