Haha, so Scheme isn't even a language, it's dozens of different languages. So much for having a "minimalistic language standard".
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 4:38
>>5 There are currently six revisions of the programming language called the Algorithmic Language Scheme.
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 4:43
>>6 Guile and Chicken are not revisions, they're incompatible implementations. Hence, there is no such language as Scheme, not even "Scheme 5" and "Scheme 6".
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 4:56
This might be a strange question, but do people sell, like rooster seamen? Like could you fertilize a hen without owning a rooster?
You mena roosters that go out to sea? That would be searoosters, not rooster seamen.
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 6:13
>>7 programs can still be written to be compatible, but they wont be common lisp compatible, henceforth scheme is a language with different implementations
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 6:16
>>10 No, you're mixing up necessary and sufficient conditions. For Scheme to be a single language, all Scheme programs must be observationally equivalent on all implementations, not just some programs.
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 6:20
pogroms can still be done to be compatible, but they wont be nigger compatible, henceforth holocaust is a language with different implementations
>>13 So today is the day you've learned about necessary and sufficient conditions? There are lots of revelations about the world out there for you, retard. Go find them!
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 6:49
11
So C isn't a language either? JavaScript? puh-lease
guess im not as intelletshual as you are
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 6:52
>>15 C is portable, Javashit is nowadays portable too. What are you talking about?
>>16 I really wonder how C would work on systems where the word size is variable I also wonder how C would work on systems with far and near pointers without using extencions and without being slow as balls We know for a fact that you can't have byte addressing in machines where bytes are less than 8 bit or/and in machines where you have bigger basic charset than the system's byte size
What's with all the lisp hate? Just some angry newfag from /g/ or some other huskel shithole? Lisp envy. I mean this place is known for liking lisp and is a necessary attribute for it to be what it is. Newfag, learn the rules and follow them. You're wrong about everything anyways.
>>18 Those aren't real platforms, just something you made up.
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 8:51
>>21-kun-hime-san-chan-sama, make and use a LISP MACHINE
MAKE IT AND USE IT IMMEDIATELY
Don't continue to use inferiori C machines, Von Neuman architectures etc
FPGA maek lisp now.
DO IT
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 9:01
>>22 I'm not a "kun-hime-san-chan-sama". Buzz off, jerk. Also, Lithp is shit.
Name:
Anonymous2014-08-04 9:03
>>19 What's with all the lisp forcing? Just some angry newfag from /g/ or some other scheme shithole? Lisp forcing. I mean this place is known for ignoring lisp and is a necessary attribute for it to be what it is. Newfag, learn the rules and follow them. You're wrong about everything anyways.
When it's between you and the other guy, do you really think they're going to hire the one with ``twelve years of chicken'' listed under experience on the resume?