>>15LISHP may have been first at something, but it never achieved anything and now having closures and message-passing are the only sources of LISHP pride.
Physical units of measurement correspond directly to Haskell newtypes and phantom types, so equating them is totally valid.
Not all humans are equal and therefore not all make errors.
Non sequitur. Look at the LITHP idiot, look at him and laugh.
Not how it works nor is it meant to be done in a literal way. You wouldn’t understand
Bla-bla, keep fantasizing, but first: go fuck yourself, you pseudo-intellectual piece of shit.
Correct programming in lisp is a completely logical endeavour.
Ooh, so LISHP solves the halting problem? Amazing bullshit. Keep it coming, I like to laugh at imbeciles.