Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Why Haskell is the best

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 3:50

http://vimeo.com/102785458

big words? get a dictionary, kid.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 4:52

install gentoo

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 4:56

Is there a written version? Videos are shit.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 5:28

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 7:05

>>4

That was superior. Very superior.

THE GREATEST HUG

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 7:10

>>5
They were kinda bad actors. Both the bodyguards and the Fuhrer looked directly at the corner cameras, which ruined it realistically. The fuhrer did show some enthusiasm in his role, which is a shame really, as he could've done a much better work had he given some more thought into it.

4/10 would recommend watching in a boring Friday afternoon.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 9:08

Funny how even the creator of a unityped LITHP has to resort to type signatures:

http://blog.cognitect.com/blog/2014/8/6/transducers-are-coming

;;reducing function signature
whatever, input -> whatever

Haha, what a primitive shithole.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 9:11

>>7
Oh, and he regards higher-order functions as a novelty, haha.

LISHP is slow, bug-ridden implementation of half of Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 10:43

>>7,8
*lisp

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 11:19

>>9
*African-American language of parentheses

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-07 18:08

>>8
Back to 4chan, noob. C, Lisp, the two greatest languages and both untyped because if you're good at programming then you don't need them. Do nuclear engineers have a typed version of graph paper? Nope. The real good ones just use their heads. Intelligence isn't typed and therefore a typed language would not work for ai programming. You can't program ai in huskel let alone do it better than Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 4:20

>>11
Back to 4chan, noob. All physics is statically typed. It would be a catastrophe if a nuclear physicist added eV and keV.
Also, all humans make errors and static typing is one of the simplest and fastest way to find most of those errors.
Also, not even good programmers can keep thousands of lines of code in their head at once. For any big project, full static typing is a must because it points out errors even in code written by someone else or years ago.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 4:28

>>12
It takes a world-class type fetishist to make different types for eV and keV. But useless types is what Haskellers and their ilk do best.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 4:42

>>13
Why, because you said so? Well, useless theorizing is what LISHPers and their ilk do best. Meanwhile in Equestria:

http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Physical_units

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 5:19

You huskel retards think that you're all that with your theorem proving but as usual lisp was first. http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/lisp20th/node4.html

>>12
All physics is statically typed. It would be a catastrophe if a nuclear physicist added eV and keV.
Pseudo-intellectual equating concepts of different fields to each other.

Also, all humans make errors
Nope. Not all humans are equal and therefore not all make errors.

Also, not even good programmers can keep thousands of lines of code in their head at once.
Not how it works nor is it meant to be done in a literal way. You wouldn’t understand since your intelligence is below nigger. Good programmers don't make errors. Haskell syntax has nothing to do with the machine or theory and just gets in the way. Errors in lisp are simply made due to the programmer being dumb or inexperienced and lacking knowledge of the machine and the theory. Correct programming in lisp is a completely logical endeavour.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 5:59

>>15
LISHP may have been first at something, but it never achieved anything and now having closures and message-passing are the only sources of LISHP pride.

Physical units of measurement correspond directly to Haskell newtypes and phantom types, so equating them is totally valid.

Not all humans are equal and therefore not all make errors.
Non sequitur. Look at the LITHP idiot, look at him and laugh.

Not how it works nor is it meant to be done in a literal way. You wouldn’t understand
Bla-bla, keep fantasizing, but first: go fuck yourself, you pseudo-intellectual piece of shit.

Correct programming in lisp is a completely logical endeavour.
Ooh, so LISHP solves the halting problem? Amazing bullshit. Keep it coming, I like to laugh at imbeciles.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 6:05

>>15
Haskell syntax has nothing to do with the machine or theory and just gets in the way

(you ('(ve got) () (to (be . ())) (((shitting) me) . () ))))))

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 6:07

>>16,17
fag

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 6:08

>>18
Why so hurt in the butt?

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 6:46

>>17
You're mind has been irreperably retardedized by the suprem provolone of le VON NEUMANN chumpatronic MASHEENEs.

You fuck.

NEVER FEAR. There is another way. What was lost can be found again.

Don't be a trendoid. BUILD YOUR NEW LISP MACHINE TODAY

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 7:05

>>20
This LITHP retard is broken, bring me a new one.

Name: >>20 2014-08-08 7:12

>>21
Your poast induced a sustained laughing session.
I'm still laughing. I don't know how to fully convey the degree of mirth you have induced.

Well done.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 7:39

Java is shit. corporate ``quality'' only effects my life in negative ways. suck my dioack down, ``oa'' faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 7:40

faggoat

Name: >>20 2014-08-08 7:52

>>23,24
Hoaly fuck, I'm dying of laughter.

You pointing out my use of "oa" in your poast was +1 good thing.

Also, please progrider sir, please to understand that I am not advocating for java. Java a shit.

I shall reveal to you that I am a Lisp man. Me me, I'm a Lisp man.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 9:26

>>25
Tell me more about this LITHP, please. Unless you're that overheated retard >>20 that needs a repair.

Name: >>20 2014-08-08 11:49

>>26
The Lithp I use is called s7 scheme, and I wrote a song about it.

you can do all the things you want to,
with s7 scheme (yes you can)
lisp is power, you'll grow like a beautiful flower
s7.c is a lisp
DEFINE THE MACRO AND THE BACRO
ying mail, yee mail

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 12:17

>>27
Do you work for S7 or what?
http://www.s7.ru/

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-08 21:46

>>20
Stanislav posts here while drunk?

Name: >>20 2014-08-08 22:28

>>29
Sir, who is Stanislav?

Name: >>20 2014-08-09 1:38

>>29,30
Never mind. My extremely slow misfiring brane just now realized who is Stanislav. My loper-os alter-ego man. Alas, I am not he.

My thought was that you must mean someone else mysterious and magical and historical. "Stanislav", my brane thought, "sounds fancy". This is due to overheating problem you mentioned previously, combined with my maladaptive thinking style where I look for the least likely answer first.

SORRY for my question.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List