Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Crypto-Atheists

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-19 16:08

The idea scares the hell out of me: namely, that
one of the people in my congregation is an Atheist
masquerading as a Christian for social advantage
(or sexual advantage, for that matter).

Is there some tried and tested method that allows me
to determine whether or not a person is a true believer?

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-19 16:09

The idea scares the hell out of me: namely, that
one of the people in my congregation is a Jew
masquerading as a Christian for social advantage
(or economic advantage, for that matter).

Is there some tried and tested method that allows me
to determine whether or not a person is a true believer?

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-19 16:23

kill them then see if they go to heaven or hel

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-19 17:13

Is this person a doctor or lawyer by chance? If so, then yes, they're looking for business. Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-19 19:59

>>1
Burn them at the stake. If God doesn't intervene they are not a believer.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-19 22:06

Test there intelligence... If they are able to rationalize decisions you have got your self an Atheist.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-19 22:43

>>6
The irony is great in this post.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-20 3:23

You can't easily test for atheism, but you can test for instances of christianity.

Protestant will clench their fists and teeth when looking at a catholic.
An adult male catholic will get visibly agitated when looking at a little boy.
A catholic boy will clench his anus when looking at a catholic man.
An eastern catholic (orthodox) will, in addition to traits displayed by western catholic, seek out drugs and abortion to condemn and indulge in.
Other variants will inform you of their faith themselves, even before nearby vegans manage to announce their dietary preferences.

If your specimen doesn't display any of the above traits, they're either a woman or not a christian.
In the former case, you shouldn't trust them regardless of all other factors.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-20 4:30

>>8
What is the attraction of the politically incorrect? The only person who comes out as being the inferior is you with your bad taste.

Name: /lounge/ 2014-08-20 9:20

/lounge/

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-20 9:32

I didn't know I was a woman! Thank you >>8-kun, I always wannted to be a girl but I was not aware that I was one

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-20 12:21

>>9
What is the attraction of being offended at everything? The only person who comes out as being the inferior is you with your bad taste.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-20 12:36

>>8
I get agitated when looking at little girls.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-20 13:52

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-20 16:37

>>14

I boycott apple products.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-20 16:48

>>8

Your portrayal of protestants is lacking. To identify a protestant, you could also show them money, or a star of david. If they get visibly agitated, you knew he is a protestant.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-20 19:32

>>16
Fun facts:
1. Lenin was protestant (his mom was german lutheran)
2. Hitler was protestant
3. Karl Marx was protestant
4. Hitler and (initially) Stalin were pro-Israel

protestants are commie nazi kikes

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-20 20:22

>>17

And most americans are protestants too.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-21 1:04

>>17
You are engaging in a logical fallacy known as an "inductive fallacy." Colloquially speaking, you are overgeneralizing.

Furthermore, your statement is not internally or externally consistent, as you have combined the asserted properties of the individuals in your list in the final statement of properties. However, you do not claim, nor is there support for the assertions that

1. Hitler was communist
2. Lenin was a nazi
3. Karl Marx was a nazi
4. Stalin was a nazi

In conclusion, you are a huge faggot who has wasted your time and mine without regard for the snack I anticipated eating seven minutes ago.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-21 2:57

>>19
It's not a fallacy, because the ideology of protestantism is favorable to jewish behavior.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-21 14:03

>>19 You are engaging in "anal autism". Colloquially speaking, you have Asperger's.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-21 14:13

>>19
Except for the fact that you are the one who commits the fallacy I have to say that you are right

1. Hitler was communist
2. Lenin was a nazi
3. Karl Marx was a nazi
4. Stalin was a nazi
Yes, Hitler was a Communist (National Socialism or anything that has to do with Socialism is Comministic)
Yes, Lenin, Karl and Stalin were nazis, their actions were equaliy bad as hitler's

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-21 15:03

>>22

Hitler was a Communist (National Socialism or anything that has to do with Socialism is Comministic)
Even more! Early Nazi symbolic included the hammer and sickle, while Nazi followers marched under the soviet music. For example, Herbei zum Kampf is a soviet march, written by a commie Jew.

http://awesternheart.blogspot.ru/2008/06/original-nazi-labor-day-medal-from-1934.html

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-21 15:13

>>23

"Nazis did not call themselves nazis. They called themselves socialists. They used the swastika to represent crossed S-letters for "socialism" (see the work of the symbologist Dr. Rex Curry). German socialists were allies with Soviet socialists in 1939 in a pact to divide up Europe, invading Poland together, and spreading WWII. The USSR was the Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics. Stop perpetuating ignorance."

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-21 15:13

>>23
Everything makes sense now!

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-21 23:41

>>20 etc.
My point in being so anal retentive was not actually to point out the fallacies in >>17, which are obvious enough that I'm assuming he was joking when he posted. My point was that the quality of thought on what is supposed to be a programmer's forum has gone to fucking shit. For that matter, there are trivially observable logical fallacies in every post from >>20 to >>24. How do you people expect to be able to construct coherent computer programs when you are so evidently incapable of formal logic? Do you think it's funny to act stupid?

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-21 23:59

>>26

I do think that stupid people are funny.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-22 0:05

>>26
You are only a pseudointellectual who thinks that only he is right while in reality you are a bullshit-spreading machine. You were the first one who started posting fallacies here

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-22 0:12

>>26
Do you think it's funny to act stupid?
Read up on the terms ``irony'' and ``sarcasm''. While technically they often fall under ``acting stupid'', they are certainly different from the most common instance of ``acting stupid''.

Highly logical people actually do more of this ``acting stupid'' than illogical people, because they can hope their peers will understand it's all an act by contrasting the fallacies with the logic usually displayed by said logical people.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-23 11:04

>>29
Highly logical people actually do more of this ``acting stupid'' than illogical people
Actually, no. Sarcasm is an informal reduction ad absurdum, while "highly logical people" (autists) have long lost any connection with reality, if they ever had, so they will use formal mode of argumentation inside of an informal discussion.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-23 12:07

>>30
Highly logical people are not autists, unlike what your local kike wants you to believe

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-23 17:19

>>31
What if he is our local kike?

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-23 19:41

rms is a good example of a highly logical person. you 4chan niggers aren't

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-23 20:21

>>33
rms
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-23 21:00

>>8
What about Mormons?

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-23 22:10

>>33

RMS is a fear mongering commie-Jew neo-luddite.

Name: Anonymous 2014-08-24 3:57

>>35

Disguised jews like all other protestants.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List