Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-08 16:02

Pick my thesis subject for me.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-08 16:05

Metaprogramming in a dependently-typed language, dependently-typed type-safe macros.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-08 16:12

Making a programming language to stop Lithp and Haskell niggers from slapping each other's ballsacks.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-08 16:42

>>3
They tried to do that with Rust, but, alas! Rust is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-09 1:11

The bayesian ethics of cyber sex with strong AI lolibots in a fuzzy chinese room in virtual reality designed with a evolutionary algorithm guided neural net, and security measures to prevent state actor spying on such things.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-09 11:21

Make an audio search engine.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-09 16:00

Thesis subject: Picking a thesis subject

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-09 20:01

loli taming

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-09 22:16

>>4
Rust is killing C++. That's noble.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-10 22:21

>>9
Rust might be able to kill Haskell, but never C++.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-10 22:48

Good thing Rust won't kill Lisp, because Lisp is dead since it's inception

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-12 15:19

rust will never catch on, you can trust me on this, i am a time travaler

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-12 19:24

>>10
lol Rust will never kill Haskell, though, it could kill Go some day...

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-12 19:58

>>13

Kill my anus

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-25 18:35

install gentoo

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-25 18:59

[>>11, >>12, >>13]
Rust is just a pretender to the throne of D.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-25 19:25

>>10
You got that backwards.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-25 21:27

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-26 1:35

>>18
One more step
Please complete the security check to access cdn-assets.answersingenesis.org

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-26 16:41

>>16
Nice try, "i luv forced GC" retard, but Rust is clearly superior.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-26 22:40

asm, c, and lisp are still the best languages respectively for low, mid, and high level work.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-26 23:38

>>21
U MENA ASM RUST HASKAL

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-28 9:51

Forth, APL, Io are still the best languages respectively for low, mid, and high level work.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-28 11:05

>>23
Forth
Formal arguments are a big win, why do you want to go to the dark past?

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-28 11:18

>>24
Because composable words are an even bigger win.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-28 20:18

>>24,25
win
le

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-12 3:29

>>9,13-14
You cannot kill that which has no life.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-13 21:24

>>25
Why do Forthards revert to formal parameters, then? And why is their code with formal parameters much shorter than code without 'em? I'm judging by https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:Forth

>>23
APL is shit for laboratory rats who have no idea of how a computer works.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-14 5:19

>>28
Why do Forthards revert to formal parameters, then?
They don't.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-14 22:24

>>25
Haskell gives you composable words with strong typing.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-16 2:00

>>30
So does Forth (if you want it to, just add some IMMEDIATE words to do type checking)

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-08 21:40

?

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-08 21:41

↖check those dubs before you wreck those dubs

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-09 22:06

next post is JACKSON 5 GET x3

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List