Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Lisp

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-12 21:38

LISP
LIST
LUST
MUST
MUSE
MUSK
MUCK
FUCK

QED

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-12 21:57

Last one should be 'suck'

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-12 23:58

arbitrary ``pattern''. What am I supposed to even be looking for?

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-13 0:11

>>2 You're right, that's better.

>>3 It's just entertainment. Try to convert one word to another using one letter substitutions.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-13 1:15

Lisp is a programmable programming language. -- John Foderaro, CACM, September 1991

One can even conjecture that Lisp owes its survival specifically to the fact that its programs are lists, which everyone, including me, has regarded as a disadvantage. -- John McCarthy, Early History of Lisp

Lisp isn't a language, it's a building material. -- Alan Kay

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-13 1:16

>>2

Well if Lisp sucks why does everyone here love it so much? I mean seriously.
We are held together only by a shared disgust for all the alternatives. -- Scott Fahlman

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-13 5:00

>>6
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-13 5:05

>>6
Don't overgeneralize, not everyone here loves LITHP.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-13 8:21

>>8

what do you love?

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-13 8:30

>>9
I hate all programming languages because they are shit. Each and every one has unavoidable flaws. What I would love is an environment with several layers, each one in a different language, yet all these languages must be implemented via one powerful metaprogramming toolkit that allows to create and inspect code at every level and see how it gets transformed into the eventual lowest-level representation. Now, it would be obvious to say that this meta-programming toolkit is Lisp but the real-world Lisp does not live up to my expectations as each Lisp has its flaws (forced GC, lack of full static typing with disjoint types, etc) and is not flexible enough to become the universal building material.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-13 9:17

Language GitHub projects
JavaScript 885,467
Java 644,711
Ruby 622,088
Python 432,533
PHP 420,913
C 218,287
Clojure 21,108
Common Lisp 6883
Scheme 5128
Racket 2727

Mwahaha, the webmonkey Javashit pseudoLisp is already more popular than CL and Scheme put together.

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-13 9:51

>>11

C is less popular than JavaShit? Really?

Name: Anonymous 2014-09-13 12:58

>>11-12
That's gitpoop to you, they count most .h files as C++ and obj-c

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2014-09-13 13:57

>>12
Ruby, Python, PHP... see a trend? ShitHub is largely comprised of "web developer" idiots.

(Java is because of the "enterprise best practice" crap that means every little goddamn piece of functionality turns into its own project bloated with a zillion classes.)

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List