JSON is shit

Why not re-represent it as XML?

http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wsdatap/v6r0m0/topic/com.ibm.dp.xm.doc/json_jsonx.html
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wsdatap/v6r0m0/topic/com.ibm.dp.xm.doc/json_jsonxconversionrules.html

worse than penis punishment

XML is shit
Why not re-represent it as JSON?
http://www.jsonml.org/

I only wish this was a joke...

Json

Shalom!

JSON is shit

Now you're realising that?

I removed comments from JSON because I saw people were using them to hold parsing directives, a practice which would have destroyed interoperability. I know that the lack of comments makes some people sad, but it shouldn't.
Suppose you are using JSON to keep configuration files, which you would like to annotate. Go ahead and insert all the comments you like. Then pipe it through JSMin before handing it to your JSON parser.
I am also a giant faggot.

wow you are a bunch of faggots, json is not that bad, you complain about any shit!

>>6
Shit is shit.

>>6
JSON is homosexual, just like you.

>>5-6
I was being ironic. Sure, it's not optimal and it's not s-exprs, but it's much, much better than XMLshit. Nobody (except IBM, Oracle and those who like to masturbate to their enterprise bullshit) thinks XML is better than JSON.

>>9
How is that ironic?

I rank things by their attractiveness as follows:

1. Using JSON
2. Being assraped by a glowing hot rod of tungsten by a gay nigger hassidic jew federal judge while having diarrhea shit of 2000 hindis and pakis being poured into my mouth from a bucked made of rotting flesh and bones of my relatives and loved ones
3. Using XML