Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Systemd Alarm Clock

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-27 17:23

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-27 18:05

It's even easier with launchd.

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-27 21:30

systemd gui toolkit when

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-27 22:36

Let's wait for the Nikita to write a symtad alarm clock In Lisp™

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-27 23:09

>>3
It's GNU/systemd.

Name: Anonymous 2014-10-28 1:10

This is pretty neat.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-03 18:31

So systemd contaminated udev and everyone is okay with systemd? Holy fuck, linuxoids really are numbskulls.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-03 20:42

>>7
But not everyone is okay with it, pay attention to the drama.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-03 23:46

>>7
everyone is okay with systemd
Are you new to the Internet or something?

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-04 6:59

>>8
Teh drama doesn't mean anything if distros (and I mean ALL distros minus two marginal ones) and even more importantly Linux userland developers (Gnome, etc.) embrace systemd. udev is already a part of systemd. And when half the packages require systemd as a prereq, even Gentoofags and Slackers will have to give in to systemd.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-04 12:27

check em

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-04 16:27

If systemd is an init system, why does it control muh network too? And you've all accepted that? Fucking retards.
And why are service names case sensitive and written in CamelCase? Who would ever use this shit?

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-04 16:43

>>12
It's PascalCase you fucking retroid.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-04 17:32

>>12
How the fuck are you supposed to use your network if you don't initialize it?

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-04 23:42

>>13
I am pretty sure it's ShitCase. Not to be confused with shitCase.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 2:42

install gentoo

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 3:11

install slackware

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 16:05

>>14
An init system controls only system startup. Not the whole fucking system after startup! Systemd is obviously a viral infection that aims to be a second kernel within Linux. So why do penguin-headed retards think that it's just a replacement for sysvinit? I sure hope Poettering makes you all his anal slaves and steals all your money from your credit cards, fucking Red Hat loving retoids.

Fucking retards, I'm migrating to Gentoo this weekend. And if Gentoo sells out too, then to FreeBSD.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 16:36

shit_case

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 16:39

>>19
Any consistent case is better than having to remember big and small letters in every fucking corner.
Case insesitivity is even better, of course, but Linux never could do that. At least it tried to remedy the situation with a consistent lowercase.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 17:25

>>20
It's not consistent if you have to use _.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 18:20

>>21
It's consistent if you have to use _ all the time. Hell, even ls'usb'modem'tools would be OK if it was like that everywhere.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 18:42

>>22
With that logic you have to use uppercase all the time so it's consistent.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 19:16

>>23
That's what Common Lishp does and it's surprisingly OK.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 19:18

>>19
Nope, that one is snake_case.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 19:23

>>25
Snakes are sacred.
http://bbs.progrider.org/

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 20:02

huskel niggers confirmed for having low iq memory

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 20:09

>>25
faggot_case

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 20:28

>>27
IQ doesn't measure intelligence.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 20:46

>>29
Well, measure my anus, then!

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 22:59

>>18
Systemd only controls networking just as sysvinit also controls the networking. Systemd is just an init system, you can easily choose to not use any non-mandatory part of systemd (which is 95% of systemd).

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 23:05

>>31
So why can't I just turn stuff on and off without asking some intermediate overengineered system for it? Because Linux is shit and has always been shit?

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-05 23:20

systemdubs

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-06 1:18

>>31
The problem with this is twofold. First, these supposedly optional components don't expose any standard interface (where "standard" means "having more than one implementation"). Second, said components are maintained together with the init system so there are far fewer practical impediments to their interfaces being unilaterally changed. Thus there is significant risk of the whole Linux user space becoming dependent on components with unstable interfaces. One can argue the same is already true for sysvinit scripts, but at least with sysvinit it's easy for non-developers to change the scripts.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-06 4:38

>>32
If you want a service management demon, there are a few of those around that are not systemd.

>>34
these supposedly optional components don't expose any standard interface
The standard interface for systemd is through the configuration files. External programs are not supposed to interface with the internal systemd interfaces.

Name: Anonymous 2014-11-06 4:45

>>35
Silly me, I wasn't aware that things like logind were merely internal...

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List